World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
141
Citations
67927
World Ranking
264
National Ranking
180

Ronald N. Germain publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald N. Germain sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 492 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ronald N. Germain D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald N. Germain sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 141 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Predominant Role for Directly Transfected Dendritic Cells in Antigen Presentation to CD8+ T Cells after Gene Gun Immunization

    Angel Porgador;Kari R. Irvine;Akiko Iwasaki;Brian H. Barber

  • Sphingosine-1-phosphate mobilizes osteoclast precursors and regulates bone homeostasis

    Masaru Ishii;Jackson G. Egen;Frederick Klauschen;Martin Meier-Schellersheim

  • The Immune Response Genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex

    Baruj Benacerraf;Ronald N. Germain

  • Monoclonal antibodies against the antigen receptor on a cloned T-cell hybrid.

    Lawrence E. Samelson;Ronald N. Germain;Ronald H. Schwartz

  • Defective major histocompatibility complex class II assembly, transport, peptide acquisition, and CD4+ T cell selection in mice lacking invariant chain expression.

    E. K. Bikoff;Li-Yun Huang;V. Episkopou;J. Van Meerwijk

  • CD8+ T Cells Orchestrate pDC-XCR1+ Dendritic Cell Spatial and Functional Cooperativity to Optimize Priming.

    Anna Brewitz;Sarah Eickhoff;Sabrina Dähling;Thomas Quast

  • Resident Macrophages Cloak Tissue Microlesions to Prevent Neutrophil-Driven Inflammatory Damage.

    Stefan Uderhardt;Andrew J. Martins;John S. Tsang;Tim Lämmermann

  • Superpenetration optical microscopy by iterative multiphoton adaptive compensation technique

    Jianyong Tang;Ronald N. Germain;Meng Cui

  • Multiplex, quantitative cellular analysis in large tissue volumes with clearing-enhanced 3D microscopy (Ce3D).

    Weizhe Li;Ronald N. Germain;Michael Y. Gerner

  • Relationships Among TCR Ligand Potency, Thresholds for Effector Function Elicitation, and the Quality of Early Signaling Events in Human T Cells

    Bernhard Hemmer;Irena Stefanova;Marco Vergelli;Ronald N. Germain

  • Antigen- and receptor-driven regulatory mechanisms. IV. Idiotype-bearing I-J + suppressor T cell factors induce second-order suppressor T cells which express anti-idiotypic receptors

    M S Sy;M H Dietz;R N Germain;B Benacerraf

  • The Efficiency of CD4 Recruitment to Ligand-engaged TCR Controls the Agonist/Partial Agonist Properties of Peptide–MHC Molecule Ligands

    Joaquín Madrenas;Luan A. Chau;Judy Smith;Jeffrey A. Bluestone

  • Induction of broadly cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells recognizing an HIV-1 envelope determinant.

    Hidemi Takahashi;Yohko Nakagawa;Charles D. Pendleton;Richard A. Houghten

  • Shared idiotypic determinants on antibodies and T-cell-derived suppressor factor specific for the random terpolymer L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10.

    R N Germain;S T Ju;T J Kipps;B Benacerraf

  • Serial TCR engagement and down-modulation by peptide:MHC molecule ligands: relationship to the quality of individual TCR signaling events.

    Yasushi Itoh;Bernhard Hemmer;Roland Martin;Ronald N. Germain

  • DOCK8 regulates lymphocyte shape integrity for skin antiviral immunity

    Qian Zhang;Christopher G. Dove;Jyh Liang Hor;Heardley M. Murdock

  • Inhibition of T-lymphocyte-mediated tumor-specific lysis by alloantisera directed against the H-2 serological specificities of the tumor

    RN Germain;ME Dorf;B Benacerraf

  • Cytolytic thymus-derived lymphocytes specific for allogeneic stimulator cells crossreact with chemically modified syngeneic cells.

    Francois Lemonnier;Steven J. Burakoff;Ronald N. Germain;Baruj Benacerraf

  • Direct delivery of exogenous MHC class I molecule-binding oligopeptides to the endoplasmic reticulum of viable cells

    Patricia M. Day;Jonathan W. Yewdell;Angel Porgador;Ronald N. Germain

  • Hapten-specific T-cell responses to 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl acetyl. II. Demonstration of idiotypic determinants on suppressor T cells.

    J Z Weinberger;R N Germain;S T Ju;M I Greene

Frequent Co-Authors

Baruj Benacerraf
Baruj Benacerraf Harvard University
Martin E. Dorf
Martin E. Dorf Harvard University
Mark I. Greene
Mark I. Greene University of Pennsylvania
Steven J. Burakoff
Steven J. Burakoff Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Norman L. Letvin
Norman L. Letvin Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Timothy A. Springer
Timothy A. Springer Boston Children's Hospital
Alfred Nisonoff
Alfred Nisonoff Brandeis University
Ronald D. Vale
Ronald D. Vale University of California, San Francisco
Ronald H. Schwartz
Ronald H. Schwartz National Institutes of Health
David H. Margulies
David H. Margulies National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of in-demand science and health careers. Many students interested in these fields are also considering related degrees to broaden their expertise and enhance job opportunities.

If you are passionate about nutrition, consider pursuing the cheapest online nutrition degree to combine scientific knowledge with practical dietary skills. For those drawn to patient care and technology, becoming a diagnostic imaging professional might be appealing. Enrolling in an ultrasound tech school online enables you to access specialized instruction and hands-on training remotely.

Aspiring radiologic technologists may benefit from exploring radiology tech online programs as a flexible way to start or advance a career in medical imaging. Additionally, dietetics is a fast-growing field that merges biology, chemistry, and health sciences. For advanced study, check out the top dietetics programs in the US for a career focused on wellness and nutrition counseling.

With the growing availability of online science and healthcare degrees, future job prospects and study options are more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald N. Germain

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles