World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
91
Citations
37914
World Ranking
640
National Ranking
296

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
37941
World Ranking
11597
National Ranking
5951

Ronald H. Schwartz publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald H. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 248 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Ronald H. Schwartz D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald H. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald H. Schwartz is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research contributions include work published in the UNC Libraries, notably a 2020 paper titled Tbata modulates thymic stromal cell proliferation and thymus function. This publication has received citations, indicating engagement from the academic community.

Their collaboration network includes multiple frequent co-authors, reflecting interdisciplinary partnerships. These co-authors are:

  • Francis A. Flomerfelt
  • Nahed El Kassar
  • Chandra Gurunathan
  • Kevin Chua
  • Stacy C. League

Their scholarly output has been published in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • A cell culture model for T lymphocyte clonal anergy

    Ronald H. Schwartz

  • T cell anergy

    Ronald H Schwartz

  • Clonal Expansion Versus Functional Clonal Inactivation: A Costimulatory Signalling Pathway Determines the Outcome of T Cell Antigen Receptor Occupancy

    Daniel L Mueller;Marc Jenkins;R. H. Schwartz

  • Costimulation of T lymphocytes: the role of CD28, CTLA-4, and B7/BB1 in interleukin-2 production and immunotherapy

    Ronald H. Schwartz

  • Antigen presentation by chemically modified splenocytes induces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo.

    Marc K. Jenkins;Ronald H. Schwartz

  • T-lymphocyte recognition of antigen in association with gene products of the major histocompatibility complex.

    Ronald H. Schwartz

  • Models of T cell anergy: is there a common molecular mechanism?

    Ronald H. Schwartz

  • Selective, stable demethylation of the interleukin-2 gene enhances transcription by an active process

    Denis Bruniquel;Ronald H. Schwartz

  • Acquisition of immunologic self-tolerance

    Ronald H. Schwartz

  • Activation of gamma delta T cells in the primary immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

    Eric M. Janis;Stefan H. E. Kaufmann;Ronald H. Schwartz;Drew M. Pardoll

  • A subset of CD4+ thymocytes selected by MHC class I molecules

    Albert Bendelac;Nigel Killeen;Dan R. Littman;Ronald H. Schwartz

  • A novel population of T-cell receptor alpha beta-bearing thymocytes which predominantly expresses a single V beta gene family.

    B. J. Fowlkes;A. M. Kruisbeek;H. Ton-That;M. A. Weston

  • Egr-2 and Egr-3 are negative regulators of T cell activation.

    Meredith Safford;Samuel Collins;Michael A. Lutz;Amy Allen

  • Inhibition of antigen-specific proliferation of type 1 murine T cell clones after stimulation with immobilized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody.

    Marc K. Jenkins;Chuan Chen;Grace Jung;Daniel L. Mueller

  • Differential expression of two distinct T-cell receptors during thymocyte development.

    Drew M. Pardoll;B. J. Fowlkes;Jeffrey A. Bluestone;Ada Kruisbeek

  • Reversal of in vitro T cell clonal anergy by IL-2 stimulation

    Bart Beverly;Sang-Mo Kang;Michael J. Lenardo;Ronald H Schwartz

  • Effects of cyclosporine A on T cell development and clonal deletion.

    Marc K. Jenkins;Ronald H. Schwartz;Drew M. Pardoll

  • Transactivation by AP-1 is a molecular target of T cell clonal anergy.

    Sang-Mo Kang;Bart Beverly;Annie-Chen Tran;Kurt Brorson

  • Molecular events in the induction of a nonresponsive state in interleukin 2-producing helper T-lymphocyte clones.

    Marc K. Jenkins;Drew M. Pardoll;Junichiro Mizuguchi;Thomas M. Chused

  • Activation events during thymic selection.

    Albert Bendelac;Polly Matzinger;Robert A. Seder;William E. Paul

Frequent Co-Authors

William E. Paul
William E. Paul National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Louis A. Matis
Louis A. Matis Alexion Pharma (Switzerland)
Marc K. Jenkins
Marc K. Jenkins University of Minnesota
Benjamin Sredni
Benjamin Sredni Bar-Ilan University
B. J. Fowlkes
B. J. Fowlkes National Institutes of Health
Jonathan D. Powell
Jonathan D. Powell Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ronald N. Germain
Ronald N. Germain National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
David H. Sachs
David H. Sachs Columbia University
Dan L. Longo
Dan L. Longo Harvard University
Lawrence E. Samelson
Lawrence E. Samelson National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various specialized careers, many of which can be pursued through flexible online programs. For those interested in combining healthcare and patient-focused care, exploring functional medicine nurse practitioner programs can provide advanced clinical training with a holistic approach.

Alternatively, careers in medical coding and health data management are booming fields that complement a microbiology background. Aspiring professionals can enhance their qualifications by becoming a certified professional coder, a role critical to the healthcare industry’s financial and medical record accuracy.

For those drawn to administrative and managerial aspects, pursuing a health information management bachelor degree salary often reflects strong job prospects and growth. These roles focus on protecting patient data and ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations.

Choosing the right program is essential, and students should consider accredited options like the best online health information management degree cahiim accredited programs, which guarantee quality education and industry recognition. Such pathways expand career opportunities beyond traditional microbiology roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald H. Schwartz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles