World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Duk-Woo Park

Duk-Woo Park

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
26142
World Ranking
14628
National Ranking
54

Duk-Woo Park publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duk-Woo Park sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 824 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Duk-Woo Park D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duk-Woo Park sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Duk-Woo Park is affiliated with the University of Ulsan in South Korea and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine with an emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans several related subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics centered on cardiovascular health and treatment methods. These topics include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Duk-Woo Park has contributed to multiple frequently cited publications including:

  • The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation, 2020, The Lancet
  • Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques (PREVENT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, 2024, The Lancet
  • Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The most frequent publication venues for Duk-Woo Park's work include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC Asia
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • EuroIntervention

Throughout their career, Duk-Woo Park has collaborated extensively with several co-authors. The most frequent collaborators are:

  • Do-Yoon Kang
  • Jung-Min Ahn
  • Seung-Jung Park
  • Pil Hyung Lee
  • Jinho Lee

Best Publications

  • Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease.

    Seung Jung Park;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park;Sung Cheol Yun

  • Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents

    Seung-Jung Park;Duk-Woo Park;Young-Hak Kim;Soo-Jin Kang

  • Stents versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Ki Bae Seung;Duk-Woo Park;Young-Hak Kim;Seung-Whan Lee

  • Frequency of and risk factors for stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation during long-term follow-up.

    Duk Woo Park;Seong Wook Park;Kyoung Ha Park;Bong Ki Lee

  • Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Long-Term Mortality in Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

    Seung Jung Park;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park;Seung Whan Lee

  • Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease

    Seung Jung Park;Jung Min Ahn;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park

  • Late Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation An Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis With Long-Term Follow-Up

    Myeong Ki Hong;Gary S. Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee;Duk Woo Park

  • Optical Coherence Tomographic Analysis of In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis After Drug–Eluting Stent Implantation

    Soo-Jin Kang;Gary S. Mintz;Takashi Akasaka;Duk-Woo Park

  • Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study.

    Jung Min Ahn;Jae Hyung Roh;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park

  • Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Stenting Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Results From the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) Registry

    Duk Woo Park;Ki Bae Seung;Young Hak Kim;Jong Young Lee

  • Extent, Location, and Clinical Significance of Non-Infarct-Related Coronary Artery Disease Among Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Duk Woo Park;Duk Woo Park;Robert M. Clare;Phillip J. Schulte;Karen S. Pieper

  • Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Cheol Whan Lee;Jung Min Ahn;Duk Woo Park;Soo Jin Kang

  • Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

    Myeong Ki Hong;Gary S. Mintz;Cheol Whan Lee;Duk Woo Park

  • Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

    Seung-Jung Park;Soo-Jin Kang;Jung-Min Ahn;Eun Bo Shim

  • Randomized Trial Evaluating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusion.

    Seung Whan Lee;Pil Hyung Lee;Jung Min Ahn;Duk Woo Park

  • Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The DECLARE-DIABETES Trial (A Randomized Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic Patients)

    Seung Whan Lee;Seong Wook Park;Young Hak Kim;Sung Cheol Yun

  • Comprehensive Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Stent Area and Its Impact on Restenosis and Adverse Cardiac Events in 403 Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease

    Soo-Jin Kang;Jung-Min Ahn;Haegeun Song;Won-Jang Kim

  • Validation of Intravascular Ultrasound–Derived Parameters With Fractional Flow Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity

    Soo-Jin Kang;Jong-Young Lee;Jung-Min Ahn;Gary S. Mintz

  • Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial

    E Magnus Ohman;Matthew T Roe;P Gabriel Steg;P Gabriel Steg;Stefan K James

  • Validation of SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score for Prediction of Outcomes After Unprotected Left Main Coronary Revascularization

    Young-Hak Kim;Duk-Woo Park;Won-Jang Kim;Jong-Young Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Seung-Whan Lee
Seung-Whan Lee Asan Medical Center
Young-Hak Kim
Young-Hak Kim Asan Medical Center
Seung-Jung Park
Seung-Jung Park University of Ulsan
Cheol Whan Lee
Cheol Whan Lee Asan Medical Center
Jong-Young Lee
Jong-Young Lee Sungkyunkwan University
Seong Wook Park
Seong Wook Park University of Ulsan
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Yangsoo Jang
Yangsoo Jang Yonsei University
Hyo-Soo Kim
Hyo-Soo Kim Seoul National University Hospital
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about medicine but seeking alternative routes or supplemental qualifications, numerous flexible online programs are available. Healthcare is a broad field, and there are various in-demand roles apart from becoming a physician.

For those interested in pharmacy, a 3-year online pharmd program provides a convenient way to earn a Doctor of Pharmacy degree while balancing work or family commitments. Clinical careers such as nursing also offer flexible pathways; you can explore the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs to advance your practice and specialize.

Not every healthcare career requires direct patient care or advanced degrees. Administrative and technology roles are expanding rapidly. For example, online rhit degree programs prepare students for managing patient data and health records, which are essential in any medical system. Meanwhile, earning medical billing and coding certification online can lead to reliable, remote, and well-paid opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Duk-Woo Park

Trending Scientists