World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 50 14287 12860 795 707 119 10228

Gregory G. Wildgoose publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gregory G. Wildgoose between 2003 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gregory G. Wildgoose published across 17 years, from 2003 to 2019, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2008. 2 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2008. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications
2003 2019

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gregory G. Wildgoose: publications per year, 2003 to 2019
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 9
2005 10
2006 12
2007 14
2008 28
2009 11
2010 5
2011 9
2012 2
2013 2
2014 7
2015 6
2016 6
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
Total 125
Download as CSV

Gregory G. Wildgoose publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory G. Wildgoose sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 119 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 119
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Gregory G. Wildgoose D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory G. Wildgoose sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861 50
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gregory G. Wildgoose is affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on materials science, with a specific emphasis on materials chemistry. The main topics of their work include crystallization and solubility studies, as well as X-ray diffraction in crystallography.

Wildgoose has contributed to research published in notable venues, with The Cambridge Structural Database being a frequent publication outlet. Their recent papers demonstrate involvement in experimental crystal structure determination, which aligns with their focus on crystallographic methods and materials characterization.

  • CCDC 1517556: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2020, The Cambridge Structural Database
  • CCDC 1494812: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2020, The Cambridge Structural Database

The scientist has collaborated with several co-authors across their publications. Frequent collaborators include Robin J. Blagg, who has co-authored two papers with Wildgoose, as well as Elliot J. Lawrence and Elliot L. Bennett, each contributing to one publication jointly.

  • Robin J. Blagg
  • Elliot J. Lawrence
  • Elliot L. Bennett

Their work spans four publications categorized under materials science, contributing to the subfield of materials chemistry. The research outputs mainly engage with investigations that utilize X-ray diffraction techniques to elucidate crystal structures and study solubility properties, which are essential aspects in the field of crystallography and material development.

Best Publications

  • Metal nanoparticles and related materials supported on carbon nanotubes: methods and applications.

    Gregory G. Wildgoose;Craig E. Banks;Richard G. Compton

  • Electrocatalysis at graphite and carbon nanotube modified electrodes: edge-plane sites and tube ends are the reactive sites

    Craig E. Banks;Trevor J. Davies;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Cyclic voltammetry on electrode surfaces covered with porous layers: An analysis of electron transfer kinetics at single-walled carbon nanotube modified electrodes

    Ian Streeter;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Lidong Shao;Richard G. Compton

  • Chemically Modified Carbon Nanotubes for Use in Electroanalysis

    Gregory G. Wildgoose;Craig E. Banks;Henry C. Leventis;Richard G. Compton

  • Sensitive adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of paracetamol at multiwalled carbon nanotube modified basal plane pyrolytic graphite electrode

    Roohollah Torabi Kachoosangi;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Sensitive electrochemical detection of arsenic (III) using gold nanoparticle modified carbon nanotubes via anodic stripping voltammetry

    Lei Xiao;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Electroanalysis using macro-, micro-, and nanochemical architectures on electrode surfaces. Bulk surface modification of glassy carbon microspheres with gold nanoparticles and their electrical wiring using carbon nanotubes.

    Xuan Dai;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Chris Salter;and Alison Crossley

  • The use of copper(II) oxide nanorod bundles for the non-enzymatic voltammetric sensing of carbohydrates and hydrogen peroxide

    Christopher Batchelor-McAuley;Yi Du;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors for quantifying the ‘heat’ of chilli peppers: the adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of capsaicin

    Roohollah Torabi Kachoosangi;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Separating Electrophilicity and Lewis Acidity: The Synthesis, Characterization, and Electrochemistry of the Electron Deficient Tris(aryl)boranes B(C6F5)3–n(C6Cl5)n (n = 1–3)

    Andrew E. Ashley;Thomas J. Herrington;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Hasna Zaher

  • Nickel(ii) tetra-aminophthalocyanine modified MWCNTs as potential nanocomposite materials for the development of supercapacitors

    Alfred Tawirirana Chidembo;Kenneth I. Ozoemena;Kenneth I. Ozoemena;Bolade O. Agboola;Vinay Gupta

  • Apparent ‘electrocatalytic’ activity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in the detection of the anaesthetic halothane: occluded copper nanoparticles

    Xuan Dai;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Electroanalytical Determination of Cadmium(II) and Lead(II) Using an Antimony Nanoparticle Modified Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode

    Kathryn E. Toghill;Lei Xiao;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton

  • Copper oxide nanoparticle impurities are responsible for the electroanalytical detection of glucose seen using multiwalled carbon nanotubes

    Christopher Batchelor-McAuley;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton;Lidong Shao

  • The Fabrication and Characterization of a Bismuth Nanoparticle Modified Boron Doped Diamond Electrode and Its Application to the Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium(II) And Lead(II)

    Kathryn E. Toghill;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Amir Moshar;Chris Mulcahy

  • Design, fabrication, characterisation and application of nanoelectrode arrays

    Richard G. Compton;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Neil V. Rees;Ian Streeter

  • Anthraquinone-derivatised carbon powder: reagentless voltammetric pH electrodes

    Gregory G Wildgoose;Malingappagari Pandurangappa;Nathan S Lawrence;Li Jiang

  • Derivatised carbon powder electrodes: reagentless pH sensors.

    Henry C Leventis;Ian Streeter;Gregory G Wildgoose;Nathan S Lawrence

  • The influence of edge-plane defects and oxygen-containing surface groups on the voltammetry of acid-treated, annealed and “super-annealed” multiwalled carbon nanotubes

    Andrew F. Holloway;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Richard G. Compton;Lidong Shao

  • Chemical derivatisation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes using diazonium salts.

    Charles G. R. Heald;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Li Jiang;Timothy G. J. Jones

  • Facile Protocol for Water-Tolerant “Frustrated Lewis Pair”-Catalyzed Hydrogenation

    Daniel J. Scott;Trevor R. Simmons;Elliot J. Lawrence;Gregory G. Wildgoose

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Compton
Richard G. Compton University of Oxford
Alison Crossley
Alison Crossley University of Oxford
Nathan S. Lawrence
Nathan S. Lawrence University of Oxford
Craig E. Banks
Craig E. Banks Manchester Metropolitan University
Christopher Batchelor-McAuley
Christopher Batchelor-McAuley Trinity College Dublin
Malcolm L. H. Green
Malcolm L. H. Green University of Oxford
David L. Hughes
David L. Hughes University of East Anglia
Martin Lutz
Martin Lutz Utrecht University
Dermot O'Hare
Dermot O'Hare University of Oxford
Leigh Aldous
Leigh Aldous King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, many of which can be pursued through related online degrees. For example, those interested in legal aspects of chemistry might explore paralegal roles, where an paralegal salary associate's degree provides a solid foundation.

Alternatively, chemistry graduates can transition into pharmaceutical sales. It's a dynamic field with lucrative prospects; understanding the pharmaceutical sales rep salary and career paths is crucial for making informed decisions.

For those aiming higher in the medical field, becoming a pharmacist is a logical step. Chemistry knowledge is essential here, and insights into how to become a pharmacist salary can help guide your educational pathway.

Furthermore, the field of forensic science offers a unique niche as an autopsy technician. Those interested should review the educational requirements and autopsy technician salary to assess its suitability as a career.

Exploring these related degrees and career pathways can enhance your understanding of how a chemistry background can translate into various professions with distinct salary ranges and job outlooks.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory G. Wildgoose

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles