World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
50
Citations
10337
World Ranking
10159
National Ranking
405

Alison Crossley publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison Crossley sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 132 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

Alison Crossley D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison Crossley sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alison Crossley is a researcher affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the fields of Materials Science, Environmental Science, and Engineering, with contributions that intersect various subfields including Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Pollution, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

Their research topics focus on several key areas:

  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Nanotechnology research and applications

Crossley has published papers in notable venues such as Nature Nanotechnology and NanoImpact. Two recent papers exemplify their research contributions:

  • "Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment," published in 2020 in Nature Nanotechnology
  • "Nanosafety research in Europe - Towards a focus on nano-enabled products," published in 2021 in NanoImpact

Their frequent coauthors include Barry Park and Socorro Vázquez-Campos, each with multiple collaborations. Other coauthors are Claus Svendsen, Lee A. Walker, and Marianne Matzke.

Publication venues where Crossley frequently contributes include:

  • Nature Nanotechnology
  • NanoImpact

Crossley's work is situated firmly at the intersection of environmental and materials sciences, with an emphasis on how nanotechnology can be assessed and managed within environmental contexts. Contributions to topics like microplastics and recycling indicate an engagement with waste management and pollution mitigation.

Best Publications

  • Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids

    Keith R. Paton;Eswaraiah Varrla;Claudia Backes;Ronan J. Smith

  • Carbon Nanotubes Contain Metal Impurities Which Are Responsible for the “Electrocatalysis” Seen at Some Nanotube-Modified Electrodes

    Craig E. Banks;Alison Crossley;Christopher Salter;Shelley J. Wilkins

  • Infrared spectra for co isotopes chemisorbed on Pt “111”: Evidence for strong absorbate coupling interactions

    Unknown

  • Adsorbate island dimensions and interaction energies from vibrational spectra: Co on Pt {001} and Pt {111}

    Unknown

  • Silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate induce high toxicity to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio.

    Fabianne Ribeiro;Julián Alberto Gallego-Urrea;Kerstin Jurkschat;Alison Crossley

  • Oxygenated Edge Plane Sites Slow the Electron Transfer of the Ferro-/Ferricyanide Redox Couple at Graphite Electrodes

    Xiaobo Ji;Craig E. Banks;Alison Crossley;Richard G. Compton

  • Electroanalysis using macro-, micro-, and nanochemical architectures on electrode surfaces. Bulk surface modification of glassy carbon microspheres with gold nanoparticles and their electrical wiring using carbon nanotubes.

    Xuan Dai;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Chris Salter;and Alison Crossley

  • An assessment of the fate, behaviour and environmental risk associated with sunscreen TiO2 nanoparticles in UK field scenarios

    Andrew C. Johnson;Michael J. Bowes;Alison Crossley;Helen P. Jarvie

  • Zinc oxide nanoparticles toxicity to Daphnia magna: size-dependent effects and dissolution.

    Sílvia Lopes;Fabianne Ribeiro;Jacek Wojnarowicz;Witold Łojkowski

  • Boron- and nitrogen-doped multi-wall carbon nanotubes for gas detection

    Jean Joseph Adjizian;Radouane Leghrib;Antal A. Koos;Irene Suarez-Martinez;Irene Suarez-Martinez

  • Effect of the experimental parameters on the structure of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes produced by aerosol chemical vapour deposition

    Antal A. Koós;Michael Dowling;Kerstin Jurkschat;Alison Crossley

  • Comparison of structural changes in nitrogen and boron-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes

    Antal A. Koós;Frank Dillon;Ekaterina A. Obraztsova;Alison Crossley

  • Single walled carbon nanotubes contain residual iron oxide impurities which can dominate their electrochemical activity

    Jaanus Kruusma;Nigel Mould;Kerstin Jurkschat;Alison Crossley

  • Removal of amorphous carbon for the efficient sidewall functionalisation of single-walled carbon nanotubes

    Lidong Shao;Gerard Tobias;Christoph G. Salzmann;Belén Ballesteros

  • Liquid exfoliation of interlayer spacing-tunable 2D vanadium oxide nanosheets: High capacity and rate handling Li-ion battery cathodes

    Chuanfang (John) Zhang;Sang-Hoon Park;Sean E. O'Brien;Andrés Seral-Ascaso

  • Use of high-purity metal-catalyst-free multiwalled carbon nanotubes to avoid potential experimental misinterpretations.

    Craig P Jones;Kerstin Jurkschat;Alison Crossley;Richard G Compton

  • The anodic stripping voltammetry of nanoparticles: electrochemical evidence for the surface agglomeration of silver nanoparticles.

    Her Shuang Toh;Christopher Batchelor-McAuley;Kristina Tschulik;Margitta Uhlemann

  • Catalytic and noncatalytic CO oxidation on Au/TiO2 catalysts

    J.M.C. Soares;Peter Morrall;Alison Crossley;Peter Harris

  • Printable magnetite and pyrrole treated magnetite based electrodes for supercapacitors

    Xin Zhao;Xin Zhao;Colin Johnston;Alison Crossley;Patrick S. Grant

  • Surface studies of hydroxylated multi-wall carbon nanotubes

    Robert H. Bradley;Kelby Cassity;Rodney Andrews;Mark Meier

  • Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment

    Claus Svendsen;Lee A. Walker;Marianne Matzke;Elma Lahive

  • Nanographene oxide-based radioimmunoconstructs for in vivo targeting and SPECT imaging of HER2-positive tumors

    Bart Cornelissen;Sarah Able;Veerle Kersemans;Philip A. Waghorn

  • Super-washing does not leave single walled carbon nanotubes iron-free.

    Kerstin Jurkschat;Xiaobo Ji;Alison Crossley;Richard G. Compton

  • Voltammetric and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic fingerprinting of carboxylic acid groups on the surface of carbon nanotubes via derivatisation with arylnitro labels

    Adam T. Masheter;Lei Xiao;Gregory G. Wildgoose;Alison Crossley

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Compton
Richard G. Compton University of Oxford
Gregory G. Wildgoose
Gregory G. Wildgoose University of East Anglia
Nicole Grobert
Nicole Grobert University of Oxford
Craig E. Banks
Craig E. Banks Manchester Metropolitan University
Claus Svendsen
Claus Svendsen Imperial College London
David J. Spurgeon
David J. Spurgeon University of Reading
Martin R. Castell
Martin R. Castell University of Oxford
Valeria Nicolosi
Valeria Nicolosi Trinity College Dublin
Li Jiang
Li Jiang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xiaobo Ji
Xiaobo Ji Central South University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alison Crossley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles