World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7500 7207 92 90 176 5600

Rasmus Astrup publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rasmus Astrup between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rasmus Astrup published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2022. 23 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2022. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 7 publications
2006 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rasmus Astrup: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 0
2010 6
2011 6
2012 10
2013 10
2014 17
2015 7
2016 12
2017 11
2018 16
2019 8
2020 14
2021 23
2022 27
2023 21
2024 16
2025 7
Total 215
Download as CSV

Rasmus Astrup publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Astrup sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 176
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Rasmus Astrup D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Astrup sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Rasmus Astrup is affiliated with the Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with particular emphasis on environmental engineering, global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, insect science, and ecology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to remote sensing and LiDAR applications, forest ecology and management, forest management and policy, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, forest biomass utilization and management, fire effects on ecosystems, and tree root and stability studies.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Estimation of Forest Growing Stock Volume with UAV Laser Scanning Data: Can It Be Done without Field Data?, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Automated forest inventory: Analysis of high-density airborne LiDAR point clouds with 3D deep learning, 2024, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • National mapping and estimation of forest area by dominant tree species using Sentinel-2 data, 2020, Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Climate targets in European timber-producing countries conflict with goals on forest ecosystem services and biodiversity, 2023, Communications Earth & Environment
  • Large scale mapping of forest attributes using heterogeneous sets of airborne laser scanning and National Forest Inventory data, 2021, Forest Ecosystems

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Astrup's notable co-authors include Johannes Breidenbach, Stefano Puliti, Clara Antón-Fernández, Marius Hauglin, and Terje Gobakken.

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), International Journal of Forest Engineering, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, and Forest Ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Mapping forests using an unmanned ground vehicle with 3D LiDAR and graph-SLAM

    Marek Marian Pierzchala;Philippe Giguère;Rasmus Andreas Astrup

  • Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species.

    H.C. Thorpe;R. Astrup;A. Trowbridge;K.D. Coates

  • Remote sensing and forest inventories in Nordic countries – roadmap for the future

    Annika Kangas;Rasmus Andreas Astrup;Johannes Breidenbach;Jonas Fridman

  • Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape

    Kari Bjørneraas;Erling Johan Solberg;Ivar Herfindal;Bram Van Moorter

  • Monitoring spruce volume and biomass with InSAR data from TanDEM-X

    Svein Solberg;Rasmus Astrup;Johannes Breidenbach;Barbi Nilsen

  • Comparison of four types of 3D data for timber volume estimation

    Johannes Rahlf;Johannes Breidenbach;Svein Solberg;Erik Næsset

  • Small area estimation of forest attributes in the Norwegian National Forest Inventory

    Johannes Breidenbach;Rasmus Andreas Astrup

  • Comparison of carbon estimation methods for European forests

    Mathias Neumann;Adam Moreno;Volker Mues;Sanna Härkönen

  • Estimating spruce and pine biomass with interferometric X-band SAR

    Svein Solberg;Rasmus Astrup;Terje Gobakken;Erik Næsset

  • Estimating biomass in Hedmark County, Norway using national forest inventory field plots and airborne laser scanning

    Terje Gobakken;Erik Næsset;Ross Nelson;Ole Martin Bollandsås

  • Recruitment limitation in forests: Lessons from an unprecedented mountain pine beetle epidemic

    Rasmus Astrup;K. David Coates;Erin Hall

  • A sensible climate solution for the boreal forest

    Rasmus Andreas Astrup;Pierre Y. Bernier;Helene Genet;David A. Lutz

  • Estimation of Forest Growing Stock Volume with UAV Laser Scanning Data: Can It Be Done without Field Data?

    Stefano Puliti;Johannes Breidenbach;Rasmus Andreas Astrup

  • Competitive interactions across a soil fertility gradient in a multispecies forest

    K. David Coates;Erica B. Lilles;Rasmus Astrup

  • Automatic detection of snow breakage at single tree level using YOLOv5 applied to UAV imagery

    Unknown

  • Climate targets in European timber-producing countries conflict with goals on forest ecosystem services and biodiversity

    Unknown

  • Estimating single-tree branch biomass of Norway spruce with terrestrial laser scanning using voxel-based and crown dimension features

    Marius Hauglin;Rasmus Astrup;Terje Gobakken;Erik Næsset

  • Estimating Soil Displacement from Timber Extraction Trails in Steep Terrain: Application of an Unmanned Aircraft for 3D Modelling

    Marek Pierzchała;Bruce Talbot;Rasmus Astrup

  • Modelling above-ground biomass stock over Norway using national forest inventory data with ArcticDEM and Sentinel-2 data

    Stefano Puliti;Marius Hauglin;Johannes Breidenbach;P. Montesano

  • Quantifying the Model-Related Variability of Biomass Stock and Change Estimates in the Norwegian National Forest Inventory

    Johannes Breidenbach;Clara Antón-Fernández;Hans Petersson;Ronald E. McRoberts

  • Empirical coverage of model-based variance estimators for remote sensing assisted estimation of stand-level timber volume

    Johannes Breidenbach;Ronald E. McRoberts;Rasmus Astrup

  • Climate change implications of shifting forest management strategy in a boreal forest ecosystem of Norway

    Ryan M. Bright;Clara Antón-Fernández;Rasmus Astrup;Francesco Cherubini

  • Measuring wheel ruts with close-range photogrammetry

    Marek Pierzchała;Bruce Talbot;Rasmus Astrup

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Næsset
Erik Næsset Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Anders Hammer Strømman
Anders Hammer Strømman Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Svein Solberg
Svein Solberg Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Terje Gobakken
Terje Gobakken Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Erling Johan Solberg
Erling Johan Solberg Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Francesco Cherubini
Francesco Cherubini Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Stephanie Eisner
Stephanie Eisner University of Kassel
Ole Martin Bollandsås
Ole Martin Bollandsås Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Shaochun Huang
Shaochun Huang Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring online doctoral programs without dissertation can offer a flexible path to achieve a terminal degree while balancing professional commitments. These programs often emphasize practical application over research, which can be appealing to working professionals.

Students aiming to transition from a master's to a doctorate may find eds to edd bridge programs online particularly valuable. These pathways streamline the educational journey, allowing candidates to deepen their specialization without redundant coursework.

Environmental professionals with a focus on social aspects might consider a dsw program, which integrates social work practice and policy—crucial for addressing environmental justice and community health issues associated with environmental challenges.

For those starting their academic careers, affordable options like an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can provide a broad foundation, often with the flexibility to focus on environmental topics through electives or minors. This approach offers a cost-effective way to enter the field before specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Rasmus Astrup

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles