World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
5600
World Ranking
7498
National Ranking
92

Rasmus Astrup publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Astrup sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Rasmus Astrup D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Astrup sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rasmus Astrup is affiliated with the Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with particular emphasis on environmental engineering, global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, insect science, and ecology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to remote sensing and LiDAR applications, forest ecology and management, forest management and policy, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, forest biomass utilization and management, fire effects on ecosystems, and tree root and stability studies.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Estimation of Forest Growing Stock Volume with UAV Laser Scanning Data: Can It Be Done without Field Data?, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Automated forest inventory: Analysis of high-density airborne LiDAR point clouds with 3D deep learning, 2024, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • National mapping and estimation of forest area by dominant tree species using Sentinel-2 data, 2020, Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Climate targets in European timber-producing countries conflict with goals on forest ecosystem services and biodiversity, 2023, Communications Earth & Environment
  • Large scale mapping of forest attributes using heterogeneous sets of airborne laser scanning and National Forest Inventory data, 2021, Forest Ecosystems

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Astrup's notable co-authors include Johannes Breidenbach, Stefano Puliti, Clara Antón-Fernández, Marius Hauglin, and Terje Gobakken.

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), International Journal of Forest Engineering, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, and Forest Ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Mapping forests using an unmanned ground vehicle with 3D LiDAR and graph-SLAM

    Marek Marian Pierzchala;Philippe Giguère;Rasmus Andreas Astrup

  • Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species.

    H.C. Thorpe;R. Astrup;A. Trowbridge;K.D. Coates

  • Remote sensing and forest inventories in Nordic countries – roadmap for the future

    Annika Kangas;Rasmus Andreas Astrup;Johannes Breidenbach;Jonas Fridman

  • Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape

    Kari Bjørneraas;Erling Johan Solberg;Ivar Herfindal;Bram Van Moorter

  • Monitoring spruce volume and biomass with InSAR data from TanDEM-X

    Svein Solberg;Rasmus Astrup;Johannes Breidenbach;Barbi Nilsen

  • Comparison of four types of 3D data for timber volume estimation

    Johannes Rahlf;Johannes Breidenbach;Svein Solberg;Erik Næsset

  • Small area estimation of forest attributes in the Norwegian National Forest Inventory

    Johannes Breidenbach;Rasmus Andreas Astrup

  • Comparison of carbon estimation methods for European forests

    Mathias Neumann;Adam Moreno;Volker Mues;Sanna Härkönen

  • Estimating spruce and pine biomass with interferometric X-band SAR

    Svein Solberg;Rasmus Astrup;Terje Gobakken;Erik Næsset

  • Estimating biomass in Hedmark County, Norway using national forest inventory field plots and airborne laser scanning

    Terje Gobakken;Erik Næsset;Ross Nelson;Ole Martin Bollandsås

  • Recruitment limitation in forests: Lessons from an unprecedented mountain pine beetle epidemic

    Rasmus Astrup;K. David Coates;Erin Hall

  • A century of National Forest Inventory in Norway - informing past, present, and future decisions.

    Johannes Breidenbach;Aksel Granhus;Gro Hylen;Rune Eriksen

  • A sensible climate solution for the boreal forest

    Rasmus Andreas Astrup;Pierre Y. Bernier;Helene Genet;David A. Lutz

  • Estimation of Forest Growing Stock Volume with UAV Laser Scanning Data: Can It Be Done without Field Data?

    Stefano Puliti;Johannes Breidenbach;Rasmus Andreas Astrup

  • Competitive interactions across a soil fertility gradient in a multispecies forest

    K. David Coates;Erica B. Lilles;Rasmus Astrup

  • Automatic detection of snow breakage at single tree level using YOLOv5 applied to UAV imagery

    Unknown

  • Climate targets in European timber-producing countries conflict with goals on forest ecosystem services and biodiversity

    Unknown

  • Estimating single-tree branch biomass of Norway spruce with terrestrial laser scanning using voxel-based and crown dimension features

    Marius Hauglin;Rasmus Astrup;Terje Gobakken;Erik Næsset

  • Estimating Soil Displacement from Timber Extraction Trails in Steep Terrain: Application of an Unmanned Aircraft for 3D Modelling

    Marek Pierzchała;Bruce Talbot;Rasmus Astrup

  • Modelling above-ground biomass stock over Norway using national forest inventory data with ArcticDEM and Sentinel-2 data

    Stefano Puliti;Marius Hauglin;Johannes Breidenbach;P. Montesano

  • Quantifying the Model-Related Variability of Biomass Stock and Change Estimates in the Norwegian National Forest Inventory

    Johannes Breidenbach;Clara Antón-Fernández;Hans Petersson;Ronald E. McRoberts

  • Empirical coverage of model-based variance estimators for remote sensing assisted estimation of stand-level timber volume

    Johannes Breidenbach;Ronald E. McRoberts;Rasmus Astrup

  • Climate change implications of shifting forest management strategy in a boreal forest ecosystem of Norway

    Ryan M. Bright;Clara Antón-Fernández;Rasmus Astrup;Francesco Cherubini

  • Measuring wheel ruts with close-range photogrammetry

    Marek Pierzchała;Bruce Talbot;Rasmus Astrup

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Næsset
Erik Næsset Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Anders Hammer Strømman
Anders Hammer Strømman Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Svein Solberg
Svein Solberg Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Terje Gobakken
Terje Gobakken Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Erling Johan Solberg
Erling Johan Solberg Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Francesco Cherubini
Francesco Cherubini Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Stephanie Eisner
Stephanie Eisner University of Kassel
Ole Martin Bollandsås
Ole Martin Bollandsås Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Shaochun Huang
Shaochun Huang Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring online doctoral programs without dissertation can offer a flexible path to achieve a terminal degree while balancing professional commitments. These programs often emphasize practical application over research, which can be appealing to working professionals.

Students aiming to transition from a master's to a doctorate may find eds to edd bridge programs online particularly valuable. These pathways streamline the educational journey, allowing candidates to deepen their specialization without redundant coursework.

Environmental professionals with a focus on social aspects might consider a dsw program, which integrates social work practice and policy—crucial for addressing environmental justice and community health issues associated with environmental challenges.

For those starting their academic careers, affordable options like an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can provide a broad foundation, often with the flexibility to focus on environmental topics through electives or minors. This approach offers a cost-effective way to enter the field before specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Rasmus Astrup

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles