World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter K. Isquith

Peter K. Isquith

Peter K. Isquith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Isquith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter K. Isquith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Isquith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter K. Isquith is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States and focuses primarily on research in the field of medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and molecular biology.

The main topics of Peter K. Isquith's research include:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Infant development and preterm care
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Autism spectrum disorder research
  • Ion transport and channel regulation
  • Pharmacological effects and toxicity studies

Peter K. Isquith has published several papers, with notable recent works including:

  • "Improved everyday executive functioning following profound reduction in seizure frequency with fenfluramine: Analysis from a phase 3 long-term extension study in children/young adults with Dravet syndrome" (2021, Epilepsy & Behavior)
  • "Fenfluramine treatment is associated with improvement in everyday executive function in preschool-aged children (<5 years) with Dravet syndrome: A critical period for early neurodevelopment" (2022, Epilepsy & Behavior)
  • "Univariate and Multivariate Base Rates of Score Elevations, Reliable Change, and Inter-Rater Discrepancies in the BRIEF-A Standardization Samples" (2021, Assessment)
  • "Fenfluramine Treatment Improves Everyday Executive Functioning in Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Analysis from a Phase 3 Clinical Trial" (2021, Neuropediatrics)
  • "Multivariate base rates of score elevations on the BRIEF2 in children with ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, or specific learning disorder with impairment in reading" (2022, Child Neuropsychology)

The researcher frequently collaborates with other scientists. Their prominent coauthors include Gérard A. Gioia, Robert M. Roth, Arnold R. Gammaitoni, Rima Nabbout, and Gail Farfel.

Peter K. Isquith's publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Neurology
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Child Neuropsychology

Best Publications

  • Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive Function

    Gioia Ga;Isquith Pk;Guy Sc;Kenworthy L

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in a Clinical Sample

    Gerard A. Gioia;Peter K. Isquith;Paul D. Retzlaff;Kimberly A. Espy

  • Profiles of everyday executive function in acquired and developmental disorders.

    Gerard A. Gioia;Peter K. Isquith;Lauren Kenworthy;Richard M. Barton

  • Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury.

    Gerard A Gioia;Peter K Isquith

  • Executive function in preschool children: examination through everyday behavior.

    Peter K. Isquith;Gerard A. Gioia;Kimberly Andrews Espy

  • Assessment of executive function in preschool-aged children.

    Peter K. Isquith;Jennifer S. Crawford;Kimberly Andrews Espy;Gerard A. Gioia

  • Contribution of rating scales to the assessment of executive functions.

    Peter K Isquith;Robert M Roth;Gerard Gioia

  • Which symptom assessments and approaches are uniquely appropriate for paediatric concussion

    G A Gioia;J C Schneider;C G Vaughan;P K Isquith

  • Assessment of executive functions in children with neurological impairment.

    Gerard A. Gioia;Peter K. Isquith;Steven C. Guy

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version in Healthy Adults and Application to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Robert M. Roth;Charles E. Lance;Peter K. Isquith;Adina S. Fischer

  • Improving identification and diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury with evidence: Psychometric support for the Acute Concussion Evaluation

    Gerard A. Gioia;Michael Collins;Peter K. Isquith

  • Self- and informant reports of executive function on the BRIEF-A in MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints.

    Laura A. Rabin;Robert M. Roth;Peter K. Isquith;Heather A. Wishart

  • Cognitive sequelae of treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: cranial radiation requires an accomplice

    D P Waber;N J Tarbell;D Fairclough;K Atmore

  • Assessment of executive functioning using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF).

    Robert M. Roth;Peter K. Isquith;Gerard A. Gioia

  • Executive Function and Emotion Regulation Strategy Use in Adolescents

    Crystal Lantrip;Peter K. Isquith;Nancy S. Koven;Kathleen Welsh

  • Psychosocial treatment of children in foster care: a review.

    Robert Racusin;Arthur C. Maerlender;Anjana Sengupta;Peter K. Isquith

  • Executive Function in the Real World: BRIEF lessons from Mark Ylvisaker.

    Gerard A. Gioia;Lauren Kenworthy;Peter K. Isquith

  • The Credibility of Children as Witnesses in a Simulated Child Sex Abuse Trial

    L. Matthew Duggan;Moss Aubrey;Eric Doherty;Peter Isquith

  • A-240 Enhanced Interpretation of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function–Adult Version (BRIEF-A)

    Trujillo S;Carrillo A;Greene J;Roth R

  • Contribution of Rating Scales to Intervention for Executive Dysfunction

    Peter K. Isquith;Robert M. Roth;Lauren Kenworthy;Gerard A. Gioia

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Roth
Robert M. Roth Dartmouth College
Lauren Kenworthy
Lauren Kenworthy Center for Autism and Related Disorders
Kimberly Andrews Espy
Kimberly Andrews Espy Wayne State University
Merete Øie
Merete Øie University of Oslo
Nancy J. Tarbell
Nancy J. Tarbell Harvard University
Dean W. Beebe
Dean W. Beebe Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Stephen M. Kanne
Stephen M. Kanne Weill Cornell Medicine
Laura A. Rabin
Laura A. Rabin City University of New York
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Ingrid E. Scheffer
Ingrid E. Scheffer University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens up a diverse range of career opportunities. For those seeking flexible study options, there are numerous accelerated pathways, including accelerated online psychology doctorate programs in USA. These programs allow you to earn your doctorate more quickly, helping you gain advanced credentials without a lengthy time commitment.

If you are based in Virginia, you can choose from some of the fastest online psychology doctorate degrees in Virginia or pursue one of the fastest online psychology master's degrees in Virginia. These options are ideal for those balancing professional responsibilities or other commitments while furthering their education.

Students in Texas can benefit from accelerated online psychology programs in Texas, which can fast-track your journey toward roles in counseling, research, human resources, or mental health services. Choosing the right program depends on your career goals, location, and preferred pace, but online degrees provide unmatched flexibility and accessibility for a dynamic field like psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Peter K. Isquith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles