World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 6002 5585 3255 2959 141 6700

Robert M. Roth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert M. Roth between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert M. Roth published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 30 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 14 publications
1986 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert M. Roth: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 10
2005 3
2006 6
2007 6
2008 2
2009 3
2010 4
2011 7
2012 5
2013 4
2014 11
2015 6
2016 11
2017 11
2018 5
2019 3
2020 6
2021 23
2022 10
2023 15
2024 16
2025 14
Total 190
Download as CSV

Robert M. Roth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Roth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert M. Roth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Roth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert M. Roth is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, and Epidemiology.

They have contributed to several main topics within medical research, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment

Their recent publications include:

  • Antiepileptic drug effects on subjective and objective cognition, 2020, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Time to Support Extensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Exploring Deep Transfer Learning Techniques for Alzheimer's Dementia Detection, 2021, Frontiers in Computer Science
  • Incident Impaired Cognitive Function in Sarcopenic Obesity: Data From the National Health and Aging Trends Survey, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • The Impact of THC and CBD in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Grant G Moncrief
  • Stephen L. Aita
  • John A. Batsis
  • László A. Erdődi
  • Barbara C. Jobst

Their publications have appeared in the following venues most frequently:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Neurology
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Psychological Injury and Law

Best Publications

  • Verbal fluency performance in amnestic MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints.

    Katherine E. Nutter-Upham;Andrew J. Saykin;Andrew J. Saykin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Robert M. Roth

  • Contribution of rating scales to the assessment of executive functions.

    Peter K Isquith;Robert M Roth;Gerard Gioia

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version in Healthy Adults and Application to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Robert M. Roth;Charles E. Lance;Peter K. Isquith;Adina S. Fischer

  • Self- and informant reports of executive function on the BRIEF-A in MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints.

    Laura A. Rabin;Robert M. Roth;Peter K. Isquith;Heather A. Wishart

  • Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of response inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Robert M. Roth;Andrew J. Saykin;Laura A. Flashman;Heather S. Pixley

  • Executive dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: cognitive and neuroimaging findings

    Robert M. Roth;Andrew J. Saykin

  • Regional brain atrophy in cognitively intact adults with a single APOE ε4 allele

    H. A. Wishart;Andrew Saykin;T. W. McAllister;L. A. Rabin

  • Assessment of executive functioning using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF).

    Robert M. Roth;Peter K. Isquith;Gerard A. Gioia

  • The neural circuitry of reward and its relevance to psychiatric disorders.

    David T. Chau;Robert M. Roth;Alan I. Green

  • Executive Function and Emotion Regulation Strategy Use in Adolescents

    Crystal Lantrip;Peter K. Isquith;Nancy S. Koven;Kathleen Welsh

  • Apathy in schizophrenia: reduced frontal lobe volume and neuropsychological deficits.

    Robert M. Roth;Laura A. Flashman;Andrew J. Saykin;Thomas W. McAllister

  • Cognitive effects of pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review.

    Richard S E Keefe;Shawn M. McClintock;Robert M. Roth;P. Murali Doraiswamy

  • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators

    Laszlo A Erdodi;Christopher A Abeare;Jonathan D Lichtenstein;Bradley T Tyson

  • The fornix and mammillary bodies in older adults with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive complaints: a volumetric MRI study.

    Brittany R. Copenhaver;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Andrew J. Saykin;Robert M. Roth

  • Chronic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of tremor in multiple sclerosis: review and case reports

    H. A. Wishart;D. W. Roberts;R. M. Roth;Brenna McDonald

  • Everyday Executive Functioning in Chronic Pain: Specific Deficits in Working Memory and Emotion Control, Predicted by Mood, Medications, and Pain Interference.

    Katharine S Baker;Stephen Gibson;Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis;Robert M Roth

  • CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

    Eben S. Schwartz;Laszlo Erdodi;Nicholas Rodriguez;Jyotsna J. Ghosh

  • A cognitive behavioral intervention (HOBSCOTCH) improves quality of life and attention in epilepsy.

    Tracie A. Caller;Robert J. Ferguson;Robert M. Roth;Karen L. Secore

  • Long-term seizure, cognitive, and psychiatric outcome following trans–middle temporal gyrus amygdalohippocampectomy and standard temporal lobectomy

    Krzysztof A. Bujarski;Fuyuki Hirashima;David W. Roberts;Barbara C. Jobst

  • COMT Val158Met Genotype and Individual Differences in Executive Function in Healthy Adults.

    Heather A. Wishart;Robert M. Roth;Andrew J. Saykin;C. Harker Rhodes

  • Neurocognitive Outcomes of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

    Felix Hernandez;Jeremiah R. Brown;Donald S. Likosky;Robert A. Clough

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Saykin
Andrew J. Saykin Indiana University
Laura A. Flashman
Laura A. Flashman Dartmouth College
Thomas W. McAllister
Thomas W. McAllister Indiana University
Peter K. Isquith
Peter K. Isquith Dartmouth College
Laura A. Rabin
Laura A. Rabin City University of New York
Peter R. Giancola
Peter R. Giancola University of Kentucky
Barbara C. Jobst
Barbara C. Jobst Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
Kieron O'Connor
Kieron O'Connor University of Montreal
Brenna C. McDonald
Brenna C. McDonald Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Dominic J. Parrott
Dominic J. Parrott Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology doesn’t stop at traditional campus programs. Many students now choose online degrees, offering flexibility without sacrificing quality. With so many accredited courses available, it’s important to find a program that aligns with your goals—whether you want a general foundation or a specialized field like clinical, counseling, or industrial-organizational psychology.

Rankings can guide your search. For example, if you’re comparing the top psychology programs in Greenville, you’ll find options supporting both on-campus and online learners. Similarly, those seeking the best psychology degree rankings in Houston can discover top-rated schools with strong online offerings.

Degree options aren’t limited by location—large regions like the Midwest boast many reputable schools, showcased in the top psychology programs in the Midwest. Even states like Nebraska offer strong online and hybrid options, as detailed in the top psychology programs in Nebraska.

Earning an online psychology degree can open diverse pathways in healthcare, education, research, and social services. With the right program, you can tailor your education to your dream career, wherever you live.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Roth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles