World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
46169
World Ranking
8174
National Ranking
269

Alaide Chieffo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alaide Chieffo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 805 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Alaide Chieffo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alaide Chieffo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alaide Chieffo is affiliated with Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Italy and has contributed extensively to research in medicine, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work encompasses a range of specialized subfields including surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, epidemiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, notably:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Frequently published venues for Alaide Chieffo include:

  • EuroIntervention
  • European Heart Journal
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, who have contributed to numerous studies together. Notable collaborators include:

  • Matteo Montorfano
  • Francesco Burzotta
  • Antonio Colombo
  • Davide Capodanno
  • Roxana Mehran

Some recent significant papers associated with the field of cardiovascular management and interventions include the following:

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes, 2024, European Heart Journal
  • The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030, 2021, The Lancet
  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes, 2023, European Heart Journal

The body of work emphasizes clinical guidelines and management strategies for coronary and cardiovascular diseases, reflecting a sustained engagement with current and evolving practices in cardiology.

Best Publications

  • Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents.

    Ioannis Iakovou;Thomas Schmidt;Erminio Bonizzoni;Lei Ge

  • Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II

    Vasim Farooq;David Van Klaveren;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Emanuele Meliga

  • The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030.

    Birgit Vogel;Monica Acevedo;Yolande Appelman;C Noel Bairey Merz

  • An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group.

    Vijay Kunadian;Alaide Chieffo;Paolo G. Camici;Colin Berry

  • Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study.

    Roxana Mehran;Usman Baber;Philippe Gabriel Steg;Cono Ariti

  • Early and Mid-Term Results of Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Unprotected Left Main

    Alaide Chieffo;Goran Stankovic;Erminio Bonizzoni;Eleftheria Tsagalou

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.

    Daniel J F M Thuijs;A Pieter Kappetein;Patrick W Serruys;Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr

  • Incidence and Predictors of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis During and After Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Treatment

    Flavio Airoldi;Antonio Colombo;Nuccia Morici;Azeem Latib

  • Coronary Thrombosis and Major Bleeding After PCI With Drug-Eluting Stents: Risk Scores From PARIS.

    Usman Baber;Roxana Mehran;Gennaro Giustino;David J. Cohen

  • Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation.

    Lei Ge;Flavio Airoldi;Ioannis Iakovou;John Cosgrave

  • Second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation followed by 6- versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy: the SECURITY randomized clinical trial.

    Antonio Colombo;Alaide Chieffo;Arian Frasheri;Roberto Garbo

  • ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With COVID-19: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes.

    Giulio G. Stefanini;Matteo Montorfano;Daniela Trabattoni;Daniele Andreini

  • Percutaneous Treatment With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Bypass Surgery for Unprotected Left Main Stenosis A Single-Center Experience

    Alaide Chieffo;Nuccia Morici;Francesco Maisano;Erminio Bonizzoni

  • Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex PCI

    Gennaro Giustino;Alaide Chieffo;Tullio Palmerini;Marco Valgimigli

  • MODIFIED T-STENTING TECHNIQUE WITH CRUSHING FOR BIFURCATION LESIONS: IMMEDIATE RESULTS AND 30-DAY OUTCOME

    Antonio Colombo;Goran Stankovic;Dejan Orlic;Nicola Corvaja

  • Treating chronic total occlusions using subintimal tracking and reentry: the STAR technique

    Antonio Colombo;Ghada W. Mikhail;Iassen Michev;Ioannis Iakovou

  • Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: predictors of an adverse outcome.

    Angela Hoye;Ioannis Iakovou;Lei Ge;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem

  • Novel approaches for preventing or limiting events (Naples) II trial: impact of a single high loading dose of atorvastatin on periprocedural myocardial infarction.

    Carlo Briguori;Gabriella Visconti;Amelia Focaccio;Bruno Golia

  • In-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: impact of strut thickness

    Carlo Briguori;Cristiano Sarais;Paolo Pagnotta;Francesco Liistro

  • First Clinical Experience With a Paclitaxel Derivate–Eluting Polymer Stent System Implantation for In-Stent Restenosis Immediate and Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcome

    Francesco Liistro;Goran Stankovic;Carlo Di Mario;Takuro Takagi

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS
Azeem Latib
Azeem Latib Montefiore Medical Center
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ottavio Alfieri
Ottavio Alfieri Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Giuseppe Sangiorgi
Giuseppe Sangiorgi University of Rome Tor Vergata
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Francesco Maisano
Francesco Maisano University of Zurich
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Marco Valgimigli
Marco Valgimigli University of Bern
Corrado Tamburino
Corrado Tamburino University of Catania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare careers beyond the traditional medical school route, there are several flexible options to explore online. Many students appreciate the convenience of direct entry MSN programs online, which allow non-nurses to earn a Master’s in Nursing efficiently and transition into advanced practice roles.

For those looking to begin a nursing career quickly, consider schools that offer direct admit nursing programs. These programs typically streamline the admissions process, letting you focus on your studies sooner.

Entry requirements can be a hurdle, but you may find a nursing school without teas test requirements, eliminating the need for standardized pre-admission exams and making it easier to get started on your path.

If you’re drawn to healthcare administration, many accredited schools now offer online programs in medical billing and coding. Some even provide financial aid for medical billing and coding, making this growing field more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Alaide Chieffo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles