World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
135
Citations
72946
World Ranking
2060
National Ranking
1167

George Dangas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Dangas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,421 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George Dangas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Dangas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Distinguished Fellowship Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)

Overview

George Dangas is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on several areas within medicine, particularly within cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The main topics covered in George Dangas's work include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Frequent co-authors with whom George Dangas has collaborated extensively include:

  • Roxana Mehran
  • Samantha Sartori
  • Annapoorna Kini
  • Samin K. Sharma
  • Davide Cao

George Dangas's publications are frequently featured in several leading academic venues, such as:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal

Among their recent papers are:

  • Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • Characterization of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Effect of Colchicine vs Standard Care on Cardiac and Inflammatory Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 2021, BMJ
  • Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2021, Circulation

George Dangas is recognized within the field, having received the Distinguished Fellowship Award from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation

    Roxana Mehran;Eve D. Aymong;Eugenia Nikolsky;Zoran Lasic

  • Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gregg W. Stone;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi;Jan Z. Peruga

  • Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes

    Michael E. Farkouh;Michael Domanski;Lynn A. Sleeper;Flora S. Siami

  • Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome

    Roxana Mehran;George Dangas;Andrea S. Abizaid;Gary S. Mintz

  • The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency.

    Luis Gruberg;Gary S Mintz;Roxana Mehran;George Dangas

  • Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY trial

    Steven V. Manoukian;Frederick Feit;Roxana Mehran;Michele D. Voeltz

  • Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study

    Kenichi Fujii;Stéphane G. Carlier;Gary S. Mintz;Yi-ming Yang

  • In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era.

    George D. Dangas;Bimmer E. Claessen;Adriano Caixeta;Elias A. Sanidas

  • Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part II.

    Gregg W. Stone;David E. Kandzari;Roxana Mehran;Antonio Colombo

  • Contrast-Induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables

    George Dangas;Ioannis Iakovou;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eve D. Aymong

  • Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI

    Roxana Mehran;Usman Baber;Samin K Sharma;David J Cohen

  • Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial

    David E Kandzari;Michael Böhm;Felix Mahfoud;Felix Mahfoud;Raymond R Townsend

  • Catheter-based renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED): a randomised, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial

    Raymond R Townsend;Felix Mahfoud;Felix Mahfoud;David E Kandzari;Kazuomi Kario

  • A risk score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

    Roxana Mehran;Stuart J. Pocock;Eugenia Nikolsky;Tim Clayton

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies

    William S. Weintraub;Maria V. Grau-Sepulveda;Jocelyn M. Weiss;Sean M. O'Brien

  • Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study.

    Roxana Mehran;Usman Baber;Philippe Gabriel Steg;Cono Ariti

  • Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: A meta-analysis

    Eugenia Nikolsky;Roxana Mehran;Amir Halkin;Eve D. Aymong

  • Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

    Gregg W Stone;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi;Jan Z Peruga

  • Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W Stone;Michael A Peterson;Alexandra J Lansky;George Dangas

  • Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Alexandra J. Lansky;Stuart J. Pocock;Bernard J. Gersh

Frequent Co-Authors

Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Samin K. Sharma
Samin K. Sharma Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Antonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS
Stuart J. Pocock
Stuart J. Pocock London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Alaide Chieffo
Alaide Chieffo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degree options and career pathways to consider. Many students pursue nursing school online to begin their healthcare careers, thanks to the flexibility and affordability of these programs.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, rn to bsn cheapest programs provide a cost-effective and accessible way to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Those interested in research, academic, or high-level clinical roles might consider phd nursing programs online to further specialize within the field.

If you have a non-nursing background and wish to shift into nursing, msn direct entry programs online offer a streamlined way to earn an advanced degree and enter nursing quickly. Exploring these pathways can expand your career options in healthcare beyond traditional medicine degrees.

Best Scientists Citing George Dangas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles