World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 211 186 174 123 114 2593 193134
Medicine 214 107 96 75 67 2589 199962

Gregg W. Stone publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gregg W. Stone between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gregg W. Stone published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 65.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 187 publications in 2017. 109 of the 2,692 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 187. Peak 187 publications in 2017. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 25 publications 2002: 77 publications 2003: 87 publications 2004: 79 publications 2005: 68 publications 2006: 62 publications 2007: 61 publications 2008: 67 publications 2009: 77 publications 2010: 111 publications 2011: 128 publications 2012: 145 publications 2013: 159 publications 2014: 124 publications 2015: 143 publications 2016: 169 publications 2017: 187 publications 2018: 132 publications 2019: 142 publications 2020: 173 publications 2021: 132 publications 2022: 70 publications 2023: 74 publications 2024: 64 publications 2025: 45 publications
1985 2025

2,692 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gregg W. Stone: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 3
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 3
1995 11
1996 15
1997 7
1998 14
1999 13
2000 19
2001 25
2002 77
2003 87
2004 79
2005 68
2006 62
2007 61
2008 67
2009 77
2010 111
2011 128
2012 145
2013 159
2014 124
2015 143
2016 169
2017 187
2018 132
2019 142
2020 173
2021 132
2022 70
2023 74
2024 64
2025 45
Total 2,692
Download as CSV

Gregg W. Stone publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregg W. Stone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 2,589 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 2,589
Download as CSV

Gregg W. Stone D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregg W. Stone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 214–215 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 214 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10 214
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in United States Leader Award

Overview

Gregg W. Stone is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. The scope of their work extends into surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and internal medicine.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Internal Medicine

The topics most frequently addressed in their research are:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Gregg W. Stone has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Björn Redfors
  • Ziad A. Ali
  • Akiko Maehara
  • Ori Ben-Yehuda
  • JoAnn Lindenfeld

The scientist has published in a variety of cardiovascular-focused journals, with the most frequent venues being:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • EuroIntervention
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-Up, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients, Health Care Workers, and Health Systems During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Effect of Intermediate-Dose vs Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation on Thrombotic Events, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment, or Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, 2021, JAMA

Best Publications

  • A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Stephen G. Ellis;David A. Cox;James Hermiller

  • A Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Gregg W. Stone;Akiko Maehara;Alexandra J. Lansky;Bernard de Bruyne

  • Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19.

    Aakriti Gupta;Aakriti Gupta;Mahesh V. Madhavan;Kartik Sehgal;Kartik Sehgal;Nandini Nair

  • A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

    C L Grines;K F Browne;J Marco;D Rothbaum

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation

    Roxana Mehran;Eve D. Aymong;Eugenia Nikolsky;Zoran Lasic

  • Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Sigmund Silber;Per Albertsson;Francisco F. Avilés;Paolo G. Camici

  • Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure.

    Gregg W. Stone;JoAnn Lindenfeld;William T. Abraham;Saibal Kar

  • A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventionDevelopment and initial validation

    R Mehran;E Aymong;E Nikolsky;Z Lasic

  • Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gregg W. Stone;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giulio Guagliumi;Jan Z. Peruga

  • Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents

    Gregg W. Stone;Jeffrey W. Moses;Stephen G. Ellis;Joachim Schofer

  • Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.

    David J. Maron;Judith S. Hochman;Harmony R. Reynolds;Sripal Bangalore

  • Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis

    Christoph Stettler;Christoph Stettler;Simon Wandel;Sabin Allemann;Adnan Kastrati

  • Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.

    Gregg W. Stone;Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Eulogio Garcia

  • Bivalirudin for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Gregg W. Stone;Brent T. McLaurin;David A. Cox;Michel E. Bertrand

  • Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome

    Roxana Mehran;George Dangas;Andrea S. Abizaid;Gary S. Mintz

  • Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cindy L. Grines;David A. Cox;Gregg W. Stone;Eulogio Garcia

  • One-Year Clinical Results With the Slow-Release, Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Stent The TAXUS-IV Trial

    Gregg W. Stone;Stephen G. Ellis;David A. Cox;James Hermiller

  • A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease☆

    G.W Stone;S.G Ellis;D.A Cox

Frequent Co-Authors

Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Akiko Maehara
Akiko Maehara Columbia University
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Ajay J. Kirtane
Ajay J. Kirtane Columbia University
Philippe Généreux
Philippe Généreux Morristown Medical Center
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine or healthcare goes beyond traditional medical degrees. Several flexible, accredited online programs can help students and professionals advance their education and open new career opportunities in the health sector.

Many nurses seek expanded roles by enrolling in asn to np programs, which provide a streamlined pathway from an associate degree in nursing to becoming a nurse practitioner. Similarly, registered nurses can further their qualifications through rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited programs, offering the flexibility of earning a bachelor’s degree without on-site clinical requirements.

For those interested in the business administration side of healthcare, cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs present excellent options to build leadership and management skills within healthcare organizations.

Expanding career horizons further, an online nutrition degree can prepare students for roles in dietetics, wellness, and public health. These online options offer flexible scheduling, making advanced education more accessible for aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Gregg W. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles