World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4169 3850 1985 1801 166 7520

Fazil Aliev publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fazil Aliev between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fazil Aliev published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2019. 31 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2019. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 19 publications
2006 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fazil Aliev: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 4
2011 10
2012 3
2013 3
2014 9
2015 13
2016 9
2017 16
2018 13
2019 22
2020 13
2021 20
2022 18
2023 19
2024 12
2025 19
Total 211
Download as CSV

Fazil Aliev publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fazil Aliev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 166
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Fazil Aliev D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fazil Aliev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Fazil Aliev is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States, contributing primarily to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research centers on genetics with a strong emphasis on epidemiology, clinical psychology, pathology and forensic medicine, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's work encompasses a number of main topics including genetic associations and epidemiology, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, alcohol consumption and health effects, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, cognitive abilities and testing, genetic mapping and diversity in plants and animals, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Fazil Aliev's publication record includes frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Behavior Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Development and Psychopathology

Their recent papers include:

  • "Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use", 2022, Nature
  • "Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction", 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Multivariate genome-wide association meta-analysis of over 1 million subjects identifies loci underlying multiple substance use disorders", 2023, Nature Mental Health
  • "Genome-wide association study identifies 48 common genetic variants associated with handedness", 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Expanding the genetic architecture of nicotine dependence and its shared genetics with multiple traits", 2020, Nature Communications

Fazil Aliev collaborates frequently with other researchers, including Danielle M. Dick, Peter B. Barr, Jessica E. Salvatore, Sally I-Chun Kuo, and Chella Kamarajan.

Best Publications

  • Transancestral GWAS of alcohol dependence reveals common genetic underpinnings with psychiatric disorders

    Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters;Renato Polimanti;Emma C. Johnson;Jeanette N. McClintick

  • Candidate gene-environment interaction research: reflections and recommendations.

    Danielle M. Dick;Arpana Agrawal;Matthew C. Keller;Amy Adkins

  • Genome-wide association study of alcohol dependence implicates a region on chromosome 11

    Howard J. Edenberg;Daniel L. Koller;Xiaoling Xuei;Leah Wetherill

  • Genome-wide association and genetic functional studies identify autism susceptibility candidate 2 gene (AUTS2) in the regulation of alcohol consumption

    Gunter Schumann;Lachlan J. Coin;Anbarasu Lourdusamy;Pimphen Charoen;Pimphen Charoen

  • Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction.

    Richard Karlsson Linnér;Travis T Mallard;Peter B Barr;Sandra Sanchez-Roige;Sandra Sanchez-Roige

  • Genetic and environmental effects on body mass index from infancy to the onset of adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts participating in the COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins) study

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon-Mi Hur

  • Genetic and environmental influences on height from infancy to early adulthood: An individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts

    Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon Mi Hur;Yoshie Yokoyama

  • Genome-wide association studies of a broad spectrum of antisocial behavior

    Jorim J Tielbeek;Jorim J Tielbeek;Jorim J Tielbeek;Ada Johansson;Ada Johansson;Ada Johansson;Tinca J C Polderman;Marja-Riitta Rautiainen;Marja-Riitta Rautiainen;Marja-Riitta Rautiainen

  • Differences in genetic and environmental variation in adult BMI by sex, age, time period, and region: an individual-based pooled analysis of 40 twin cohorts.

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Reijo Sund;Yoshie Yokoyama

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 48 common genetic variants associated with handedness

    Gabriel Cuellar-Partida;Joyce Y. Tung;Nicholas Eriksson;Eva Albrecht

  • Using Dimensional Models of Externalizing Psychopathology to Aid in Gene Identification

    Danielle M. Dick;Danielle M. Dick;Fazil Aliev;Fazil Aliev;Jen C. Wang;Richard A. Grucza

  • Family-based association analyses of alcohol dependence phenotypes across DRD2 and neighboring gene ANKK1.

    Danielle M. Dick;Danielle M. Dick;Jen C. Wang;Jevon Plunkett;Fazil Aliev

  • Genome-wide association study of comorbid depressive syndrome and alcohol dependence

    Alexis C. Edwards;Fazil Aliev;Fazil Aliev;Laura J. Bierut;Kathleen K. Bucholz

  • Expanding the genetic architecture of nicotine dependence and its shared genetics with multiple traits

    Bryan C. Quach;Michael J. Bray;Nathan C. Gaddis;Mengzhen Liu

  • Genomewide Association Analysis of Symptoms of Alcohol Dependence in the Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia (MGS2) Control Sample

    Kenneth S. Kendler;Gursharan Kalsi;Peter Alan Holmans;Alan R. Sanders

  • Genome-wide association study of conduct disorder symptomatology.

    D. M. Dick;F. Aliev;R. F. Krueger;A. Edwards

  • Polygenic risk for externalizing disorders: Gene-by-development and gene-by-environment effects in adolescents and young adults.

    Jessica E. Salvatore;Fazil Aliev;Kathleen Bucholz;Arpana Agrawal

  • Genetic association study of childhood aggression across raters, instruments, and age

    Hill F. Ip;Camiel M. van der Laan;Eva M.L. Krapohl;Isabell Brikell

  • Polygenic scores predict alcohol problems in an independent sample and show moderation by the environment

    Jessica E. Salvatore;Fazil Aliev;Alexis C. Edwards;David M. Evans

  • Association of CHRM2 with IQ : Converging evidence for a gene influencing intelligence

    Danielle M. Dick;Fazil Aliev;Fazil Aliev;John Kramer;Jen C. Wang

  • Integrating mRNA and miRNA Weighted Gene Co-Expression Networks with eQTLs in the Nucleus Accumbens of Subjects with Alcohol Dependence

    Mohammed Mamdani;Vernell Williamson;Gowon O. McMichael;Tana Blevins

Frequent Co-Authors

Danielle M. Dick
Danielle M. Dick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki
Howard J. Edenberg
Howard J. Edenberg Indiana University
John I. Nurnberger
John I. Nurnberger Indiana University
Bernice Porjesz
Bernice Porjesz SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Marc A. Schuckit
Marc A. Schuckit University of California, San Diego
Samuel Kuperman
Samuel Kuperman University of Iowa
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Matt McGue
Matt McGue University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and career paths. Many students now seek flexibility, affordability, and accelerated learning through distance education. For those interested in social work but without a prior BSW, 1 year msw programs online no bsw let you quickly gain advanced credentials for roles in healthcare, community services, and advocacy.

Learners fascinated by human behavior may consider an accelerated psychology degree, which can prepare you for immediate job placement or advanced studies. Counseling remains another in-demand field, and cacrep online counseling programs ensure you receive quality, accredited training for state licensure and professional practice.

Those passionate about supporting families and couples can explore affordable online mft programs, leading to careers as marriage and family therapists. With these online pathways, students can balance life, work, and study while preparing for meaningful roles in society.

Best Scientists Citing Fazil Aliev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles