World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6310 5863 453 436 68 18689

Zhen Xiong Chen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zhen Xiong Chen between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zhen Xiong Chen published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2013. 3 of the 73 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2013. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1997 2025

73 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zhen Xiong Chen: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 1
2004 5
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 6
2009 2
2010 1
2011 1
2012 3
2013 7
2014 6
2015 4
2016 0
2017 2
2018 4
2019 5
2020 1
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 73
Download as CSV

Zhen Xiong Chen publications per year - data summary

  • Zhen Xiong Chen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Australian National University, has 73 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 7 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 1999, 2003, 2010 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 29 years in the span carry no publications at all (1998, 2016 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.8 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 7 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 22 publications (2.2 per year); 2007-2016: 32 publications (3.2 per year); 2017-2025: 19 publications (2.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Zhen Xiong Chen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zhen Xiong Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 64–73 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 68 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161 68
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Zhen Xiong Chen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Zhen Xiong Chen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Australian National University, records 68 publications - the 2nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 2% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Zhen Xiong Chen, and about 98% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Zhen Xiong Chen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Zhen Xiong Chen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zhen Xiong Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Zhen Xiong Chen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Zhen Xiong Chen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Australian National University, records 36 D-Index - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Zhen Xiong Chen, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Zhen Xiong Chen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Zhen Xiong Chen is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, and Psychology.

Their work encompasses several subfields, with a focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Demography, and Gender Studies. The main topics addressed in Chen's research include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Workplace Spirituality and Leadership, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Emotional Labor in Professions, Cultural Differences and Values, Conflict Management and Negotiation, and Social and Intergroup Psychology.

Chen has contributed to multiple scholarly articles published in recognized journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • Effects of perceived overqualification on career distress and career planning: Mediating role of career identity and moderating role of leader humility (2020, Human Resource Management)
  • Linking perceived overqualification with task performance and proactivity? An examination from self-concept-based perspective (2020, Journal of Business Research)
  • Seeing is not believing: Leader humility, hypocrisy, and their impact on followers' behaviors (2020, The Leadership Quarterly)
  • A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Exploring the Relationship Between Leader Humility and Unethical Behavior (2021, Journal of Management)
  • Give full play to the talent: exploring when perceived overqualification leads to more altruistic helping behavior through extra effort (2021, Personnel Review)

The frequent publication venues for Chen's work include Human Resource Management, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Business Research, The Leadership Quarterly, and Journal of Management.

Chen has collaborated regularly with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Chao Ma
  • Xinhui Jiang
  • Deshani B. Ganegoda
  • Xiaoshuang Lin
  • Darren K. B

Their research addresses complex interactions in the workplace, such as the effects of perceived overqualification and the role of leader humility on various employee attitudes and behaviors. The work also explores themes related to leadership ethics and organizational dynamics, often integrating perspectives from social and psychological disciplines to analyze organizational behavior.

Best Publications

  • Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model

    Samuel Aryee;Pawan S. Budhwar;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

    Hui Wang;Kenneth S. Law;Rick D. Hackett;Duanxu Wang

  • Individual Power Distance Orientation and Follower Reactions to Transformational Leaders: A Cross-Level, Cross-Cultural Examination

    Bradley L. Kirkman;Gilad Chen;Jiing-Lih Farh;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model.

    Samuel Aryee;Zhen Xiong Chen;Li-Yun Sun;Yaw A. Debrah

  • Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China.

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Anne S. Tsui;Anne S. Tsui;Jiing-Lih Farh

  • The Relationship between the Three Components of Commitment and Employee Performance in China.

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Anne Marie Francesco

  • Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice.

    Joel Brockner;Grant Ackerman;Jerald Greenberg;Michele J. Gelfand

  • Delegation And Employee Work Outcomes: An Examination Of The Cultural Context Of Mediating Processes In China

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Samuel Aryee

  • Consumer ethnocentrism and willingness to buy domestic products in a developing country setting: testing moderating effects

    Cheng Lu Wang;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange, and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance : A Chinese case

    Chun Hui;Kenneth S. Law;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Employee Demography, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intentions in China: Do Cultural Differences Matter?

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Anne Marie Francesco

  • Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes

    Samuel Aryee;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure

    Samuel Aryee;Li-Yun Sun;Zhen Xiong George Chen;Yaw A. Debrah

  • Test of a Mediation Model of Perceived Organizational Support.

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Samuel Aryee;Cynthia Lee

  • Exchange fairness and employee performance:An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice

    Samuel Aryee;Zhen Xiong Chen;Pawan S Budhwar

  • Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation

    Li Yun Sun;Zhen Zhang;Jin Qi;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Reactions to psychological contract breach: a dual perspective

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Anne S. Tsui;Anne S. Tsui;Lifeng Zhong

  • The Influence of Hedonic Values on Consumer Behaviors: An Empirical Investigation in China

    Cheng Lu Wang;Zhen Xiong Chen;Allan K K Chan;Zong Cheng Zheng

  • Inducements, contributions, and fulfillment in new employee psychological contracts

    Cynthia Lee;Jun Liu;Denise M. Rousseau;Chun Hui

  • Why and When Employees Like to Speak up More Under Humble Leaders? The Roles of Personal Sense of Power and Power Distance

    Xiaoshuang Lin;Zhen Xiong Chen;Herman H. M. Tse;Wu Wei

  • Why Do I Feel Valued and Why Do I Contribute? A Relational Approach to Employee's Organization‐Based Self‐Esteem and Job Performance

    Jun Liu;Chun Hui;Cynthia Lee;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Affective Job Insecurity: A mediator of cognitive job insecurity and employee outcomes relationships

    Guohua Emily Huang;Cynthia Lee;Susan Ashford;Zhenxiong Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel Aryee
Samuel Aryee University of Surrey
Cynthia Lee
Cynthia Lee Northeastern University
Chun Hui
Chun Hui University of Hong Kong
Anne S. Tsui
Anne S. Tsui Arizona State University
Kenneth S. Law
Kenneth S. Law Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jiing-Lih Farh
Jiing-Lih Farh China Europe International Business School
Susan J. Ashford
Susan J. Ashford University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bradley L. Kirkman
Bradley L. Kirkman North Carolina State University
Fred O. Walumbwa
Fred O. Walumbwa Florida International University
Michael W. Morris
Michael W. Morris Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse career opportunities, whether you are focused on mental health, education, or public service. Today, many universities in the USA offer flexible programs that can fit your schedule and budget.

For those passionate about social work, finding the cheapest msw programs can help you earn a graduate degree without significant financial stress. Similarly, students interested in behavioral analysis can choose from reputable bcba master's programs online to jumpstart a specialized career path.

Accelerated programs are gaining popularity among busy professionals and recent graduates. Options like the accelerated msw online can help you earn your degree faster, letting you progress to advanced roles sooner. Likewise, an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology offers a quick route to a variety of careers in counseling, research, or further graduate study.

No matter your interests, online degrees can provide affordable, flexible, and timely pathways to make a social impact and build a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Zhen Xiong Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles