World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
20068
World Ranking
3074
National Ranking
1752

Cynthia Lee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia Lee sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 195 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Cynthia Lee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cynthia Lee is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences with a focus on organizational behavior, social psychology, political science, and related interdisciplinary subfields. Their work addresses themes common to organizational dynamics, workplace relations, and legal processes.

Lee's recent scholarly articles include:

  • "Leader Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and Employee Unethical Conduct: Social Learning of Moral Disengagement as a Behavioral Principle" (2020), published in the Journal of Management
  • "When and how favour rendering ameliorates workplace ostracism over time: Moderating effect of self-monitoring and mediating effect of popularity enhancement" (2020), published in the Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • "Not just for newcomers: Organizational socialization, employee adjustment and experience, and growth in organization-based self-esteem" (2021), published in Human Resource Development Quarterly
  • "More depleted, speak up more? A daily examination of the benefit and cost of depletion for voice behavior and voice endorsement" (2022), published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • "Is leader proactivity enough: Importance of leader competency in shaping team role breadth efficacy and proactive performance" (2023), published in the Journal of Vocational Behavior

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lee include:

  • Chia-Huei Wu
  • Guohua Huang
  • Ziguang Chen
  • Ted Thrasher
  • Sunje Hwang

Lee's publication venues illustrate their active presence in several academic journals and proceedings, such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • ROSA P
  • Journal of Management

Their research topics encompass:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying

Cynthia Lee has also contributed to academic book literature, including a publication titled "Murder and the Reasonable Man" (2022) released by New York University Press eBooks.

Overall, Lee's scholarly output reflects an interdisciplinary approach integrating social science perspectives with practical implications for organizational and workplace behavior as well as broader societal issues related to ethics and legal systems.

Best Publications

  • Content, Cause, and Consequences of Job Insecurity: A Theory-Based Measure and Substantive Test

    Susan J. Ashford;Cynthia Lee;Phillip Bobko

  • Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.

    Edwin A Locke;Elizabeth Zubritzky;Cynthia Lee;Philip Bobko

  • Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: investigating generalizability and instrumentality.

    Chun Hui;Cynthia Lee;Denise M. Rousseau

  • Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures.

    Cynthia Lee;Philip Bobko

  • IMPACT OF PROCESS AND OUTCOME FEEDBACK ON THE RELATION OF GOAL SETTING TO TASK PERFORMANCE

    P. Christopher Earley;Gregory B. Northcraft;Cynthia Lee;Terri R. Lituchy

  • Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms?

    M.Susan Taylor;Edwin A. Locke;Cynthia Lee;Marilyn E. Gist

  • Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Cynthia Lee;Crystal I. Cic Farh

  • Test of a Mediation Model of Perceived Organizational Support.

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Samuel Aryee;Cynthia Lee

  • Power-Distance, Gender and Organizational Justice

    Cynthia Lee;Madan Pillutla;Kenneth S. Law

  • Employment Relationships in China: Do Workers Relate to the Organization or to People?

    Chun Hui;Cynthia Lee;Denise M. Rousseau

  • Moderating Effects of Organization-Based Self-Esteem on Organizational Uncertainty: Employee Response Relationships

    Chun Hui;Cynthia Lee

  • Self-Appraisal in Performance Evaluation: Development Versus Evaluation

    Donald J. Campbell;Cynthia Lee

  • Job Insecurity and the Changing Workplace: Recent Developments and the Future Trends in Job Insecurity Research

    Cynthia Lee;Guohua Emily Huang;Susan J. Ashford

  • Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: an organizational identification perspective

    Chia-Huei Wu;Jun Liu;Ho Kwong Kwan;Cynthia Lee

  • Psychological ownership: How having control matters.

    Jun Liu;Hui Wang;Chun Hui;Cynthia Lee

  • Joint Effects of Group Efficacy and Gender Diversity on Group Cohesion and Performance

    Cynthia Lee;Jiing-Lih Larry Farh

  • Deviance and exit: The organizational costs of job insecurity and moral disengagement.

    Guohua Emily Huang;Ned Wellman;Susan J. Ashford;Cynthia Lee

  • Differentiating cognitive and affective job insecurity: Antecedents and outcomes

    Guohua Emily Huang;Xiongying Niu;Cynthia Lee;Cynthia Lee;Susan J. Ashford

  • The effects of gender in organizational justice perception

    Cynthia Lee;Jiing-Lih Larry Farh

  • Interactive Effects of “Type A” Behavior and Perceived Control on Worker Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Somatic Complaints

    Cynthia Lee;Susan J. Ashford;Philip Bobko

  • Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When

    Cynthia Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Chun Hui
Chun Hui University of Hong Kong
Susan J. Ashford
Susan J. Ashford University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ho Kwong Kwan
Ho Kwong Kwan China Europe International Business School
Chia-Huei Wu
Chia-Huei Wu University of Leeds
Jiing-Lih Farh
Jiing-Lih Farh China Europe International Business School
P. Christopher Earley
P. Christopher Earley University of Technology Sydney
Zhen Xiong Chen
Zhen Xiong Chen Australian National University
Beth Simon
Beth Simon University of California, San Diego
Philip Bobko
Philip Bobko Gettysburg College
Sharon K. Parker
Sharon K. Parker Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA offers numerous pathways for those interested in making a difference in communities, families, and individuals' lives. One popular option is pursuing a degree in social work, which is closely connected to psychology and provides vital skills for supporting mental health and social well-being.

Online social work degrees are increasingly accessible and affordable, allowing students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments. Learners can explore the most valuable online social work degrees in the Midwest to discover top programs in that region. If you live in Nevada, consider looking into the best value online social work degrees in Nevada, which highlight colleges offering strong outcomes and affordability.

Similarly, those interested in studying in Ohio can check out the most valuable online social work degrees in Ohio, while students in Tennessee can review the most valuable online social work degree programs in Tennessee. These pathways prepare graduates for careers such as licensed social worker, mental health counselor, school counselor, and more, making them a strong complement or alternative to psychology studies.

Best Scientists Citing Cynthia Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles