World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
13665
World Ranking
5138
National Ranking
2828

Philip Bobko publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Bobko sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Philip Bobko D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Bobko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip Bobko is affiliated with Gettysburg College in the United States and primarily conducts research in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, information systems and management, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics explored in Bobko's research involve human-automation interaction and safety, team dynamics and performance, personal information management and user behavior, medical education and admissions, social and intergroup psychology, cognitive science and mapping, and competitive and knowledge intelligence.

Bobko has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with research appearing in prominent venues such as the Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management Scientific Reports, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, and Frontiers in Neuroergonomics.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Bobko are:

  • Human-agent teaming and trust calibration: a theoretical framework, configurable testbed, empirical illustration, and implications for the development of adaptive systems, 2022, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
  • Diversity climate, trust, and turnover intentions: A multilevel dynamic system, 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Swift Trust in Ad Hoc Teams: A Cognitive Task Analysis of Intelligence Operators in Multi-Domain Command and Control Contexts, 2020, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
  • Using fNIRS to Identify Transparency- and Reliability-Sensitive Markers of Trust Across Multiple Timescales in Collaborative Human-Human-Agent Triads, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroergonomics
  • Doxing, political affiliation, and type of information: Effects on suspicion, perceived similarity, and hiring-related judgments, 2023, Journal of Applied Psychology

Frequent collaborators in Bobko's work include Philip L. Roth, Leanne Hirshfield, Lucca Eloy, Jason Bennett Thatcher, and Cara Spencer.

Best Publications

  • Content, Cause, and Consequences of Job Insecurity: A Theory-Based Measure and Substantive Test

    Susan J. Ashford;Cynthia Lee;Phillip Bobko

  • Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.

    Edwin A Locke;Elizabeth Zubritzky;Cynthia Lee;Philip Bobko

  • Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures.

    Cynthia Lee;Philip Bobko

  • ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: A META‐ANALYSIS

    Philip L. Roth;Craig A. Bevier;Philip Bobko;Fred S. Switzer

  • DERIVATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF A META‐ANALYTIC MATRIX INCORPORATING COGNITIVE ABILITY, ALTERNATIVE PREDICTORS, AND JOB PERFORMANCE

    Philip Bobko;Philip L. Roth;Denise Potosky

  • Social Media in Employee-Selection-Related Decisions A Research Agenda for Uncharted Territory

    Philip L. Roth;Philip Bobko;Chad H. Van Iddekinge;Jason Bennett Thatcher

  • Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: too coarse for comfort.

    Craig J. Russell;Philip Bobko

  • A Meta-Analysis of Gender Group Differences for Measures of Job Performance in Field Studies

    Philip L. Roth;Kristen L. Purvis;Philip Bobko

  • The Usefulness of Unit Weights in Creating Composite Scores A Literature Review, Application to Content Validity, and Meta-Analysis

    Philip Bobko;Philip L. Roth;Maury A. Buster

  • Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: a new meta-analysis.

    Philip L. Roth;Allen I. Huffcutt;Philip Bobko

  • A META‐ANALYSIS OF WORK SAMPLE TEST VALIDITY: UPDATING AND INTEGRATING SOME CLASSIC LITERATURE

    Philip L. Roth;Philip Bobko;Lynn A. McFARLAND

  • Interactive Effects of “Type A” Behavior and Perceived Control on Worker Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Somatic Complaints

    Cynthia Lee;Susan J. Ashford;Philip Bobko

  • A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions.

    Philip Bobko

  • Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology.

    Edwin A. Locke;Stephan J. Motowidlo;Philip Bobko

  • College grade point average as a personnel selection device: ethnic group differences and potential adverse impact.

    Philip L. Roth;Philip Bobko

  • Using beta coefficients to impute missing correlations in meta-analysis research: Reasons for caution.

    Philip L. Roth;Huy Le;In Sue Oh;Chad H. Van Iddekinge

  • Goal‐setting theory: Unexplored areas and future research needs

    James T. Austin;Philip Bobko

  • TESTING FOR FAIRNESS WITH A MODERATED MULTIPLE REGRESSION STRATEGY: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS

    C. J. Bartlett;Philip Bobko;Steven B. Mosier;Robert Hannan

  • Contextual Effects on Escalation Processes in Public Sector Decision Making

    Mark A Davis;Philip Bobko

  • Selection Testing via the Internet: Practical Considerations and Exploratory Empirical Findings*

    Denise Potosky;Philip Bobko

  • Effect of Previously Assigned Goals on Self-Set Goals and Performance

    Edwin A. Locke;Elizabeth Frederick;Elizabeth Buckner;Philip Bobko

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip L. Roth
Philip L. Roth Clemson University
Cynthia Lee
Cynthia Lee Northeastern University
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Chad H. Van Iddekinge Florida State University
Edwin A. Locke
Edwin A. Locke University of Maryland, College Park
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Kenneth S. Law
Kenneth S. Law Chinese University of Hong Kong
In-Sue Oh
In-Sue Oh Temple University
Thomas W. Britt
Thomas W. Britt Clemson University
Michael J. Strube
Michael J. Strube Washington University in St. Louis
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open the door to a variety of online degree programs and rewarding career opportunities. Many students aim to become licensed mental health counselors, a profession with growing demand across the country. Online degrees in psychology or counseling can provide the flexibility needed for working professionals or career changers, but it's important to remember that licensure requirements differ by state.

For those interested in practicing in Texas, the process is highlighted in the Plano mental health counselor certification requirements. Florida-based students should review the Port St. Lucie mental health counselor education requirements to ensure their chosen program meets state standards. If you're looking to work in Oregon, familiarize yourself with the Portland mental health counselor certification requirements. In North Carolina, there are specific steps to become a mental health counselor in Raleigh.

As you explore related online degrees and pathways, always research your state’s requirements for education, supervised hours, and certification. This ensures your studies will lead seamlessly to career eligibility and success.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Bobko

Trending Scientists