World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5136 4762 2828 2560 134 13665

Philip Bobko publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip Bobko between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip Bobko published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2001. 5 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2001. 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 7 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1977 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip Bobko: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 3
1978 5
1979 1
1980 7
1981 1
1982 3
1983 6
1984 9
1985 4
1986 6
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 4
1991 6
1992 6
1993 4
1994 4
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 13
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 6
2006 2
2007 3
2008 6
2009 0
2010 3
2011 3
2012 5
2013 5
2014 4
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 2
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 4
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 170
Download as CSV

Philip Bobko publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Bobko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 134
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip Bobko D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Bobko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip Bobko is affiliated with Gettysburg College in the United States and primarily conducts research in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, information systems and management, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics explored in Bobko's research involve human-automation interaction and safety, team dynamics and performance, personal information management and user behavior, medical education and admissions, social and intergroup psychology, cognitive science and mapping, and competitive and knowledge intelligence.

Bobko has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with research appearing in prominent venues such as the Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management Scientific Reports, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, and Frontiers in Neuroergonomics.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Bobko are:

  • Human-agent teaming and trust calibration: a theoretical framework, configurable testbed, empirical illustration, and implications for the development of adaptive systems, 2022, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
  • Diversity climate, trust, and turnover intentions: A multilevel dynamic system, 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Swift Trust in Ad Hoc Teams: A Cognitive Task Analysis of Intelligence Operators in Multi-Domain Command and Control Contexts, 2020, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
  • Using fNIRS to Identify Transparency- and Reliability-Sensitive Markers of Trust Across Multiple Timescales in Collaborative Human-Human-Agent Triads, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroergonomics
  • Doxing, political affiliation, and type of information: Effects on suspicion, perceived similarity, and hiring-related judgments, 2023, Journal of Applied Psychology

Frequent collaborators in Bobko's work include Philip L. Roth, Leanne Hirshfield, Lucca Eloy, Jason Bennett Thatcher, and Cara Spencer.

Best Publications

  • Content, Cause, and Consequences of Job Insecurity: A Theory-Based Measure and Substantive Test

    Susan J. Ashford;Cynthia Lee;Phillip Bobko

  • Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.

    Edwin A Locke;Elizabeth Zubritzky;Cynthia Lee;Philip Bobko

  • Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures.

    Cynthia Lee;Philip Bobko

  • ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: A META‐ANALYSIS

    Philip L. Roth;Craig A. Bevier;Philip Bobko;Fred S. Switzer

  • DERIVATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF A META‐ANALYTIC MATRIX INCORPORATING COGNITIVE ABILITY, ALTERNATIVE PREDICTORS, AND JOB PERFORMANCE

    Philip Bobko;Philip L. Roth;Denise Potosky

  • Social Media in Employee-Selection-Related Decisions A Research Agenda for Uncharted Territory

    Philip L. Roth;Philip Bobko;Chad H. Van Iddekinge;Jason Bennett Thatcher

  • Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: too coarse for comfort.

    Craig J. Russell;Philip Bobko

  • A Meta-Analysis of Gender Group Differences for Measures of Job Performance in Field Studies

    Philip L. Roth;Kristen L. Purvis;Philip Bobko

  • The Usefulness of Unit Weights in Creating Composite Scores A Literature Review, Application to Content Validity, and Meta-Analysis

    Philip Bobko;Philip L. Roth;Maury A. Buster

  • Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: a new meta-analysis.

    Philip L. Roth;Allen I. Huffcutt;Philip Bobko

  • A META‐ANALYSIS OF WORK SAMPLE TEST VALIDITY: UPDATING AND INTEGRATING SOME CLASSIC LITERATURE

    Philip L. Roth;Philip Bobko;Lynn A. McFARLAND

  • Interactive Effects of “Type A” Behavior and Perceived Control on Worker Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Somatic Complaints

    Cynthia Lee;Susan J. Ashford;Philip Bobko

  • A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions.

    Philip Bobko

  • Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology.

    Edwin A. Locke;Stephan J. Motowidlo;Philip Bobko

  • College grade point average as a personnel selection device: ethnic group differences and potential adverse impact.

    Philip L. Roth;Philip Bobko

  • Using beta coefficients to impute missing correlations in meta-analysis research: Reasons for caution.

    Philip L. Roth;Huy Le;In Sue Oh;Chad H. Van Iddekinge

  • Goal‐setting theory: Unexplored areas and future research needs

    James T. Austin;Philip Bobko

  • TESTING FOR FAIRNESS WITH A MODERATED MULTIPLE REGRESSION STRATEGY: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS

    C. J. Bartlett;Philip Bobko;Steven B. Mosier;Robert Hannan

  • Contextual Effects on Escalation Processes in Public Sector Decision Making

    Mark A Davis;Philip Bobko

  • Selection Testing via the Internet: Practical Considerations and Exploratory Empirical Findings*

    Denise Potosky;Philip Bobko

  • Effect of Previously Assigned Goals on Self-Set Goals and Performance

    Edwin A. Locke;Elizabeth Frederick;Elizabeth Buckner;Philip Bobko

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip L. Roth
Philip L. Roth Clemson University
Cynthia Lee
Cynthia Lee Northeastern University
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Chad H. Van Iddekinge Florida State University
Edwin A. Locke
Edwin A. Locke University of Maryland, College Park
Jason Bennett Thatcher
Jason Bennett Thatcher University of Colorado Boulder
Joseph B. Lyons
Joseph B. Lyons United States Air Force Research Laboratory
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Zhen Xiong Chen
Zhen Xiong Chen Australian National University
Michael J. Strube
Michael J. Strube Washington University in St. Louis
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open the door to a variety of online degree programs and rewarding career opportunities. Many students aim to become licensed mental health counselors, a profession with growing demand across the country. Online degrees in psychology or counseling can provide the flexibility needed for working professionals or career changers, but it's important to remember that licensure requirements differ by state.

For those interested in practicing in Texas, the process is highlighted in the Plano mental health counselor certification requirements. Florida-based students should review the Port St. Lucie mental health counselor education requirements to ensure their chosen program meets state standards. If you're looking to work in Oregon, familiarize yourself with the Portland mental health counselor certification requirements. In North Carolina, there are specific steps to become a mental health counselor in Raleigh.

As you explore related online degrees and pathways, always research your state’s requirements for education, supervised hours, and certification. This ensures your studies will lead seamlessly to career eligibility and success.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Bobko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles