World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
23883
World Ranking
6787
National Ranking
3677

Jose M. Cortina publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose M. Cortina sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jose M. Cortina D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose M. Cortina sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jose M. Cortina is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the domains of sociology, political science, psychology, and organizational behavior. Their work spans multiple subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The researcher's recent publications cover a variety of topics and reflect a focus on psychometrics, organizational behavior, and methodological rigor. Notable papers include:

  • From alpha to omega and beyond! A look at the past, present, and (possible) future of psychometric soundness in the Journal of Applied Psychology, 2020
  • Where you came from and where you are going: The role of performance trajectory in promotion decisions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 2020
  • Assessing Publication Bias: a 7-Step User's Guide with Best-Practice Recommendations, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2022
  • Constructive replication, reproducibility, and generalizability: Getting theory testing for JOMSR right, Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 2023
  • Greater Male Variability in Cooperation: Meta-Analytic Evidence for an Evolutionary Perspective, Psychological Science, 2020

Cortina has collaborated frequently with several scholars, including Zitong Sheng, Kathleen R. Keeler, Sven Kepes, Tine Köhler, and Sheila K. Keener. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications.

In terms of publication venues, Cortina's work has appeared predominantly in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Psychological Methods
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Journal of Management Scientific Reports

Their research topics emphasize meta-analysis and systematic reviews, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, fashion and cultural textiles, qualitative comparative analysis research, attachment and relationship dynamics, and challenges related to work-family balance.

This scientist's contribution to the academic community reflects a multidimensional approach to research questions spanning quantitative methodology, social and organizational psychology, and human behavior patterns.

Best Publications

  • What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications

    Jose M. Cortina

  • Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs

    William P. Dunlap;Jose M. Cortina;Joel B. Vaslow;Michael J. Burke

  • A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits.

    Nicole M Dudley;Karin A Orvis;Justin E Lebiecki;José M Cortina

  • Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of Available Procedures

    Jose M. Cortina;Gilad Chen;William P. Dunlap

  • Interaction, Nonlinearity, and Multicollinearity: implications for Multiple Regression:

    Jose M. Cortina

  • The shared leadership of teams: A meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships

    Vias C. Nicolaides;Kate A. LaPort;Tiffani R. Chen;Alan J. Tomassetti

  • The Roles of Self-Efficacy and Task Complexity in the Relationships Among Cognitive Ability, Conscientiousness, and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analytic Examination

    Gilad Chen;Wendy J. Casper;Jose M. Cortina

  • The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores

    Jose M. Cortina;Nancy B. Goldstein;Stephanie C. Payne;H.Kristl Davison

  • THE “BIG FIVE” PERSONALITY FACTORS IN THE IPI AND MMPI: PREDICTORS OF POLICE PERFORMANCE

    Jose M. Cortina;Mary L. Doherty;Nealschmjtt;Gary Kaufman

  • Effect Size for ANOVA Designs

    Jose M. Cortina;Hossein Nouri

  • Personnel Selection and Employee Performance

    Neal Schmitt;Jose M. Cortina;Michael J. Ingerick;Darin Wiechmann

  • On the Logic and Purpose of Significance Testing

    Jose M. Cortina;William P. Dunlap

  • The looming maladaptive style: anxiety, danger, and schematic processing.

    John H. Riskind;Nathan L. Williams;Theodore L. Gessner;Linda D. Chrosniak

  • Big Data Methods: Leveraging Modern Data Analytic Techniques to Build Organizational Science

    Scott Tonidandel;Eden B. King;Jose M. Cortina

  • The Social and Economic Imperative of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Supportive Organizational Policies

    Eden B. King;José M. Cortina

  • Conscientiousness and reactions to psychological contract breach: a longitudinal field study

    Karin A. Orvis;Nicole M. Dudley;Jose M. Cortina

  • Apples and Oranges (and Pears, Oh My!): The Search for Moderators in Meta-Analysis

    Jose M. Cortina

  • The role of organizational leaders in employee emotion management: A theoretical model ☆

    Seth Kaplan;Jose Cortina;Gregory Ruark;Kate LaPort

  • When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don't.

    Jose M. Cortina;Ronald S. Landis

  • When is it acceptable to accept a null hypothesis: No way, Jose?

    Jose M. Cortina;Robert G. Folger

  • Play It Again, Sam! An Analysis of Constructive Replication in the Organizational Sciences:

    Tine Köhler;Jose M. Cortina

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald S. Landis
Ronald S. Landis Illinois Institute of Technology
Eden B. King
Eden B. King Rice University
William P. Dunlap
William P. Dunlap Tulane University
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Bo Bernhard Nielsen
Bo Bernhard Nielsen University of Sydney
Richard P. DeShon
Richard P. DeShon Michigan State University
Reeshad S. Dalal
Reeshad S. Dalal George Mason University
Gilad Chen
Gilad Chen University of Maryland, College Park
Derek R. Avery
Derek R. Avery University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and emerging career paths. Graduates can explore roles in assessment and measurement, such as learning what does a psychometrician do and contributing to educational and psychological evaluations.

Deciding between graduate degrees is another key step. Interested students may compare the differences between research-focused Ph.D. programs and clinically focused Psy.D. options. Understanding the choice between a phd vs psyd in psychology can shape both career trajectory and day-to-day responsibilities.

There is also strong demand for roles in educational environments. Many psychology graduates choose to work with children and support learning communities through school psychology jobs, where specialized training is valued.

For those interested in a holistic approach, exploring spiritual psychology careers allows practitioners to integrate spiritual well-being into mental health services. This area is growing alongside traditional psychology specialties.

Best Scientists Citing Jose M. Cortina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles