World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William P. Dunlap

William P. Dunlap

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
11239
World Ranking
4312
National Ranking
2061

William P. Dunlap publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William P. Dunlap sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

William P. Dunlap D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William P. Dunlap sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

William P. Dunlap was affiliated with Tulane University in the United States. Their academic and research activities focused primarily within this institution during their career.

There is no available record of recent papers or specific publications authored by William P. Dunlap. Similarly, information about frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, and detailed fields or subfields of study associated with their work is not documented.

No specific main topics of research or areas of investigation connected to William P. Dunlap have been identified. Likewise, there are no recorded awards or honors that they received during their career.

The absence of these data points limits the ability to characterize their research profile or specify scientific contributions in the typical categories of academic output and collaboration.

Best Publications

  • Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs

    William P. Dunlap;Jose M. Cortina;Joel B. Vaslow;Michael J. Burke

  • Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher's z transformation be used?

    N. Clayton Silver;William P. Dunlap

  • Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of Available Procedures

    Jose M. Cortina;Gilad Chen;William P. Dunlap

  • Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide:

    Michael J. Burke;William P. Dunlap

  • Averaging Correlations: Expected Values and Bias in Combined Pearson rs and Fisher's z Transformations

    David M. Corey;William P. Dunlap;Michael J. Burke

  • Duration and Exposure to Virtual Environments: Sickness Curves During and Across Sessions

    Robert S. Kennedy;Kay M. Stanney;William P. Dunlap

  • Vection and simulator sickness.

    Lawrence J. Hettinger;Kevin S. Berbaum;Robert S. Kennedy;William P. Dunlap

  • Failure to detect moderating effects: Is multicollinearity the problem?

    William P. Dunlap;Edward R. Kemery

  • Accurate tests of statistical significance for r(WG) and average deviation interrater agreement indexes.

    William P. Dunlap;Michael J. Burke;Kristin Smith-Crowe

  • On the Logic and Purpose of Significance Testing

    Jose M. Cortina;William P. Dunlap

  • Loss of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons correlates with memory impairment in rats with ischemic or neurotoxin lesions.

    Bruce T. Volpe;Hasker P. Davis;Andrew Towle;William P. Dunlap

  • Eye movement indices of mental workload.

    James G. May;Robert S. Kennedy;Mary C. Williams;William P. Dunlap

  • Approximating Pearson Product-Moment Correlations from Kendall's Tau and Spearman's Rho

    Melvin T. Rupinski;William P. Dunlap

  • Estimating effect size: Bias resulting from the significance criterion in editorial decisions

    David M. Lane;William P. Dunlap

  • Effect of exercise on longevity, body weight, locomotor performance, and passive-avoidance memory of C57BL/6J mice

    T. Samorajski;Courtney Delaney;Lisa Durham;J.M. Ordy

  • Partialling Factor Scores Does Not Control Method Variance: A Reply to Podsakoff and Todor

    Edward R. Kemery;William P. Dunlap

  • Factor Analysis of Ipsative Measures

    William P. Dunlap;John M. Cornwell

  • An animal model of human-type memory loss based on aging, lesion, forebrain ischemia, and drug studies with the rat

    J. M. Ordy;G. J. Thomas;B. T. Volpe;William P. Dunlap

  • Analysis of variance with ipsative measures

    Tammy Greer;William P. Dunlap

  • Family Environment and the Interrelation of Family Structure, Child Behavior, and Metabolic Control for Children with Diabetes

    Stacy Overstreet;Jane Goins;Ru San Chen;Clarissa S. Holmes

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Burke
Michael J. Burke Tulane University
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University
Bruce T. Volpe
Bruce T. Volpe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Mitchell E. Berman
Mitchell E. Berman Mississippi State University
Ronald S. Landis
Ronald S. Landis Illinois Institute of Technology
Gilad Chen
Gilad Chen University of Maryland, College Park
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Rodger W. Griffeth
Rodger W. Griffeth Ohio University
Gordon G. Gallup
Gordon G. Gallup University at Albany, State University of New York
Kevin W. Mossholder
Kevin W. Mossholder Auburn University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, a range of flexible online degree pathways are available to help advance your education and career. Online education offers options for both accelerated study and affordability, allowing more people to access advanced learning opportunities.

If you want to earn a postgraduate credential quickly, consider the 1 year masters programs. These fast-track degrees can help you gain specialized skills efficiently. For those beginning their undergraduate journey, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees offer a quicker path to graduation compared to traditional four-year programs.

Affordability is a key concern when choosing a graduate program. Options such as the cheapest online msw programs let you earn your Master of Social Work without high tuition costs, opening doors to rewarding careers in social work. Additionally, bcba programs can prepare you for a career as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, making a profound difference in educational and clinical settings.

Choosing the right online degree can accelerate your career growth, fit your schedule, and save on costs while helping you make a meaningful impact in the social sciences and humanities field.

Best Scientists Citing William P. Dunlap

Recently Published Articles