World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kevin W. Mossholder

Kevin W. Mossholder

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
16577
World Ranking
6030
National Ranking
3271

Kevin W. Mossholder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin W. Mossholder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kevin W. Mossholder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin W. Mossholder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Kevin W. Mossholder is affiliated with Auburn University in the United States. Their academic career is marked by recognition from professional organizations within psychology, including being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2008.

While specific topics, subfields, and detailed research areas are not listed, the scientist's association with Auburn University suggests an engagement in academic and research activities consistent with a university setting. The fellowship from the APA indicates a professional focus related to psychology.

No records of recent papers, co-authors, book publications, or frequent publication venues are provided, limiting detailed insights into the research outputs or collaboration networks. Similarly, data on fields and subfields of study or main research topics are not available in this profile.

The absence of information regarding recent papers or publication venues suggests that the publicly available source data may not include extensive recent academic contributions or that such data was not collected.

Best Publications

  • Creating Readiness for Organizational Change

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • A Relational Perspective on Turnover: Examining Structural, Attitudinal, and Behavioral Predictors

    Kevin W. Mossholder;Randall P. Settoon;Stephanie C. Henagan

  • Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior.

    Randall P. Settoon;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Cohesiveness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis Using Work Groups and Individuals:

    Roland E. Kidwell;Kevin W. Mossholder;Nathan Bennett

  • Relationships between Bases of Power and Work Reactions: The Mediational Role of Procedural Justice

    Kevin W. Mossholder;Nathan Bennett;Edward R. Kemery;Mark A. Wesolowski

  • Work experiences, job performance, and feelings of personal and family well-being

    Jeffrey H Greenhaus;Arthur G Bedeian;Kevin W Mossholder

  • Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change

    Min Z. Carter;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • The Affective Implications of Perceived Congruence with Culture Dimensions during Organizational Transformation

    Stanley G. Harris;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing

    Jixia Yang;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context

    Kevin W. Mossholder;Nathan Bennett;Christopher L. Martin

  • Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach☆

    Jixia Yang;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Human Resource Systems and Helping in Organizations: A Relational Perspective

    Kevin W. Mossholder;Hettie A. Richardson;Randall P. Settoon

  • On the Use of the Coefficient of Variation as a Measure of Diversity

    Arthur G. Bedeian;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust

    Jixia Yang;Kevin W. Mossholder;T.K. Peng

  • Balancing work and family: a field study of multi-dimensional, multi-role work-family conflict

    Sonya F. Premeaux;Cheryl L. Adkins;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Effects of externally mediated goal setting on intrinsic motivation: A laboratory experiment.

    Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal

    William F. Giles;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Social Networking Websites, Personality Ratings, and the Organizational Context: More Than Meets the Eye?1

    Donald H. Kluemper;Peter A. Rosen;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Outcomes of Role Stress: A Multisample Constructive Replication

    Edward R. Kemery;Arthur G. Bedeian;Kevin W. Mossholder;John Touliatos

  • Vision salience and strategic involvement: implications for psychological attachment to organization and job

    Sharon L. Oswald;Kevin W. Mossholder;Stanley G. Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Achilles A. Armenakis
Achilles A. Armenakis Auburn University
Hubert S. Feild
Hubert S. Feild Auburn University
Charles C. Manz
Charles C. Manz University of Massachusetts Amherst
Richard D. Arvey
Richard D. Arvey National University of Singapore
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus Drexel University
Saroj Parasuraman
Saroj Parasuraman Drexel University
William P. Dunlap
William P. Dunlap Tulane University
Fred Luthans
Fred Luthans University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Jon C. Carr
Jon C. Carr North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a wide array of online degree options and career paths. Many students pursue counseling degrees, which are available in flexible formats to suit different schedules and learning speeds. For those seeking a quicker completion time, California accelerated counseling degrees online and Florida accelerated counseling degrees online offer fast-tracked pathways into the counseling profession.

Ease of entry is also a key factor for many students. If accessibility is a top priority, you may be interested in some of the easiest online counseling degrees in the US, designed to provide straightforward admission requirements and manageable coursework. For those specifically residing in the Mid-Atlantic, the Virginia easiest counseling programs online can be an ideal choice.

Whether you choose a traditional, accelerated, or more accessible online psychology degree, you’ll find multiple options tailored to your educational needs and career goals. Graduates can pursue roles in mental health counseling, school counseling, or other supportive fields. Online programs make it easier than ever to start your journey toward a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin W. Mossholder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles