World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Achilles A. Armenakis

Achilles A. Armenakis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 54 755 698 334 302 120 23796
Psychology 52 4885 4527 2688 2432 106 23078

Achilles A. Armenakis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Achilles A. Armenakis between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Achilles A. Armenakis published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2007. 1 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2007. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 4 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1973 2024

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Achilles A. Armenakis: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 4
1975 6
1976 4
1977 4
1978 4
1979 3
1980 2
1981 3
1982 5
1983 3
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 13
2008 4
2009 5
2010 5
2011 4
2012 4
2013 7
2014 5
2015 2
2016 3
2017 0
2018 3
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Achilles A. Armenakis publications per year - data summary

  • Achilles A. Armenakis, a Business and Management scholar from Auburn University, has 130 publications recorded across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1973 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1973, 1984, 1987, 1990 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 52 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 2001, 2003, 2017 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.9 per year counting only the 45 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 2 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1973-1990: 48 publications (2.7 per year); 1991-2008: 41 publications (2.3 per year); 2009-2024: 41 publications (2.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Achilles A. Armenakis publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achilles A. Armenakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 120–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 120 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112 120
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Achilles A. Armenakis publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Achilles A. Armenakis, a Business and Management scholar from Auburn University, records 120 publications - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Achilles A. Armenakis, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Achilles A. Armenakis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Achilles A. Armenakis D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achilles A. Armenakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49 54
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Achilles A. Armenakis D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Achilles A. Armenakis, a Business and Management scholar from Auburn University, records 54 D-Index - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Achilles A. Armenakis, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Achilles A. Armenakis ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Achilles A. Armenakis is affiliated with Auburn University in the United States. Their primary research contributions lie at the intersection of business, management, and accounting, with additional work in social sciences. The scientist's expertise includes several key subfields, notably accounting and sociology and political science.

The research topics Armenakis addresses encompass auditing, earnings management, and governance; corruption and economic development; as well as corporate finance and governance. These thematic areas reflect a focus on the mechanisms and implications of financial oversight and the broader socio-economic contexts affecting corporate behavior.

Armenakis has authored recent publications in notable academic venues. Among these is the 2020 paper titled "Quad-qualified audit committee director: Implications for monitoring and reducing financial corruption", published in the Journal of Corporate Finance. This work has garnered citations that highlight its influence within the field.

The scientist collaborates frequently with a range of coauthors, including Mikhail A. Gorshunov, Stanley G. Harris, H. Jack Walker, Steven Brown, and Anju Mehta. These collaborations span diverse topics related to auditing and corporate governance, indicating a networked approach to research.

Armenakis's publication record includes work in the Journal of Corporate Finance, further underscoring a focus on corporate financial oversight and governance issues within high-impact academic platforms.

  • Quad-qualified audit committee director: Implications for monitoring and reducing financial corruption (2020, Journal of Corporate Finance)

  • Mikhail A. Gorshunov
  • Stanley G. Harris
  • H. Jack Walker
  • Steven Brown
  • Anju Mehta

  • Journal of Corporate Finance

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Social Sciences

  • Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Corruption and Economic Development
  • Corporate Finance and Governance

Best Publications

  • Creating Readiness for Organizational Change

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Arthur G. Bedeian

  • Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale.

    Daniel T. Holt;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;Stanley G. Harris

  • Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change: A 60-Year Review of Quantitative Studies

    Shaul Oreg;Maria Vakola;Achilles Armenakis

  • Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris

  • Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review

    Alannah E. Rafferty;Nerina L. Jimmieson;Achilles A. Armenakis

  • Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes

    Brian T. Gregory;Stanley G. Harris;Achilles A. Armenakis;Christopher L. Shook

  • Reflections: our Journey in Organizational Change Research and Practice

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris

  • A path-analytic study of the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity.

    Arthur G. Bedeian;Achilles A. Armenakis

  • Making change permanent A model for institutionalizing change interventions

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Hubert S. Feild

  • Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change

    Min Z. Carter;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;Kevin W. Mossholder

  • Organizational Change Recipients' Beliefs Scale: Development of an Assessment Instrument

    Achilles A. Armenakis;Jeremy B. Bernerth;Jennifer P. Pitts;H. Jack Walker

  • Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment A Study of Important Organizational Change Variables

    Jeremy B. Bernerth;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;H. Jack Walker

  • Factors influencing organizational change efforts: An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences

    H. Jack Walker;Achilles A. Armenakis;Jeremy B. Bernerth

  • The effects of specific job satisfaction facets on customer perceptions of service quality: An employee-level analysis.

    Robin L. Snipes;Sharon L. Oswald;Michael LaTour;Achilles A. Armenakis

  • Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Readiness for Change: A Review of Research and Instrumentation

    Daniel T. Holt;Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Hubert S. Feild

  • Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): development and validation of a scale

    Jeremy B. Bernerth;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;William F. Giles

  • Organizational Change Content, Process, and Context: A Simultaneous Analysis of Employee Reactions

    Dennis R. Self;Achilles A. Armenakis;Mike Schraeder

  • Dispositional resistance to change : measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations

    Shaul Oreg;Mahmut Bayazit;Maria Vakola;Luis Arciniega

  • Emotion during Organizational Transformations: An Interactive Model of Survivor Reactions

    Kevin W. Mossholder;Randall P. Settoon;Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris

  • The effects of specific job satisfaction facets on customer perceptions of service quality: An employee-level analysis

    Robin L. Snipes;Sharon L Oswald;Achilles A Armenakis;Michael S. Latour

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert S. Feild
Hubert S. Feild Auburn University
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Kevin W. Mossholder
Kevin W. Mossholder Auburn University
Nerina L. Jimmieson
Nerina L. Jimmieson Queensland University of Technology
Daniel T. Holt
Daniel T. Holt Mississippi State University
Michael S. LaTour
Michael S. LaTour University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Robert W. Zmud
Robert W. Zmud University of Oklahoma
Bernard Burnes
Bernard Burnes University of Stirling
M. Ronald Buckley
M. Ronald Buckley University of Oklahoma
Michael S. Cole
Michael S. Cole Texas Christian University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Business and Management in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and career options. Fields such as construction management and healthcare administration have seen rising demand for qualified managers and leaders. If you're interested in a specialized sector, a 2 year construction management degree online can prepare you quickly for roles in the booming building industry.

For those considering healthcare, an online healthcare administration degree online is another strong pathway. Healthcare managers are crucial for efficient and effective care delivery in a growing market.

Many students prefer fast completion options, so exploring accelerated college programs can help you earn your qualifications quickly and enter the workforce sooner. If cost is a major factor, compare the cheapest online business management degree programs to find high quality education at a manageable price point.

With so many online business, management, and leadership programs available, you can tailor your education to fit your career goals, schedule, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Achilles A. Armenakis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles