World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
35
Citations
8443
World Ranking
2160
National Ranking
868

Daniel T. Holt publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel T. Holt sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 67 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Daniel T. Holt D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel T. Holt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale.

    Daniel T. Holt;Achilles A. Armenakis;Hubert S. Feild;Stanley G. Harris

  • Examining the Link between “Familiness” and Performance: Can the F–PEC Untangle the Family Business Theory Jungle?:

    Matthew W. Rutherford;Donald F. Kuratko;Daniel T. Holt

  • Viewing Family Firm Behavior and Governance Through the Lens of Agency and Stewardship Theories

    Kristen Madison;Daniel T. Holt;Franz W. Kellermanns;Franz W. Kellermanns;Annette L. Ranft

  • Examining Family Firm Succession From a Social Exchange Perspective: A Multiphase, Multistakeholder Review

    Joshua J. Daspit;Daniel T. Holt;James J. Chrisman;James J. Chrisman;Rebecca G. Long

  • Organizational Justice and Individuals' Withdrawal: Unlocking the Influence of Emotional Exhaustion

    Michael S. Cole;Jeremy B. Bernerth;Frank Walter;Daniel T. Holt

  • Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Readiness for Change: A Review of Research and Instrumentation

    Daniel T. Holt;Achilles A. Armenakis;Stanley G. Harris;Hubert S. Feild

  • Are You Ready? How Health Professionals Can Comprehensively Conceptualize Readiness for Change

    Daniel T. Holt;Christian D. Helfrich;Carmen G. Hall;Bryan J. Weiner

  • Corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical look at the innovativeness dimension and its antecedents

    Matthew W. Rutherford;Daniel T. Holt

  • Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Readiness for Change: The Case for an Expanded Conceptualization

    Daniel T. Holt;James M. Vardaman

  • Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship

    Jeffrey S. Hornsby;Donald F. Kuratko;Daniel T. Holt;William J. Wales

  • Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Look at Individual Characteristics, Context, and Process

    Daniel T. Holt;Matthew W. Rutherford;Gretchen R. Clohessy

  • Advancing the Field of Family Business Research: Further Testing the Measurement Properties of the F-PEC

    Daniel T. Holt;Matthew W. Rutherford;Donald F. Kuratko

  • Forgotten but not gone: an examination of fit between leader consideration and initiating structure needed and received.

    Lisa Schurer Lambert;Bennett J. Tepper;Jon C. Carr;Daniel T. Holt

  • The development of an instrument to measure readiness for knowledge management

    Daniel T Holt;Summer E Bartczak;Steven W Clark;Martin R Trent

  • Family Firm(s) Outcomes Model: Structuring Financial and Nonfinancial Outcomes Across the Family and Firm:

    Daniel T. Holt;Allison W. Pearson;Jon C. Carr;Tim Barnett

  • The Quagmire of Legacy in Family Firms: Definition and Implications of Family and Family Firm Legacy Orientations

    Nathan L. Hammond;Allison W. Pearson;Daniel T. Holt

  • Work-group and organizational support: A test of distinct dimensions

    Dennis R. Self;Daniel T. Holt;William S. Schaninger

  • Toward a Cultural Contingency Model of Leadership

    Jan P. Muczyk;Daniel T. Holt

  • Effects of Career Plateauing on Turnover: A Test of a Model

    Sharon G. Heilmann;Daniel T. Holt;Christine Y. Rilovick

  • An application of the unfolding model to explain turnover in a sample of military officers

    Daniel T. Holt;Michael T. Rehg;Jeffrey H. S. Lin;Jennifer Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

James J. Chrisman
James J. Chrisman Mississippi State University
Allison W. Pearson
Allison W. Pearson Mississippi State University
Donald F. Kuratko
Donald F. Kuratko Indiana University
Franz W. Kellermanns
Franz W. Kellermanns University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jon C. Carr
Jon C. Carr North Carolina State University
Alfredo Vittorio De Massis
Alfredo Vittorio De Massis Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Jeffrey S. Hornsby
Jeffrey S. Hornsby University of Missouri–Kansas City
Achilles A. Armenakis
Achilles A. Armenakis Auburn University
Hubert S. Feild
Hubert S. Feild Auburn University
Michael S. Cole
Michael S. Cole Texas Christian University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel T. Holt

Recently Published Articles