World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
68
Citations
23356
World Ranking
843
National Ranking
402

Bryan J. Weiner publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan J. Weiner sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 249 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Bryan J. Weiner D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan J. Weiner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan J. Weiner is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of medicine and health professions, with significant work in general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, oncology, economics and econometrics, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their main research topics cover a range of areas including health policy implementation science, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, primary care and health outcomes, global maternal and child health, community health and development, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, and adolescent sexual and reproductive health.

Weiner has a strong publication record across several venues. Frequent publication outlets include UNC Libraries, Implementation Science Communications, JCO Oncology Practice, BMC Health Services Research, and Implementation Research and Practice.

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Weiner include:

  • Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review, 2020, Implementation Science
  • A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health, 2020, Implementation Science
  • Measuring implementation outcomes: An updated systematic review of measures' psychometric properties, 2020, Implementation Research and Practice
  • The mechanics of implementation strategies and measures: advancing the study of implementation mechanisms, 2022, Implementation Science Communications
  • Advancing mechanisms of implementation to accelerate sustainable evidence-based practice integration: protocol for generating a research agenda, 2021, BMJ Open

Weiner collaborates frequently with a consistent group of coauthors, including Gabrielle B. Rocque, Jennifer Young Pierce, Doris Howell, Angela M. Stover, and Ethan Basch, each associated with more than 20 joint publications.

Best Publications

  • A theory of organizational readiness for change

    Bryan J. Weiner

  • Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures

    Bryan J. Weiner;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cameo Stanick;Byron J. Powell

  • Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields.

    Bryan J. Weiner;Halle Amick;Shoou Yih Daniel Lee

  • Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure

    Christopher M Shea;Sara R Jacobs;Denise A Esserman;Kerry Bruce

  • Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda.

    Byron J. Powell;Maria E. Fernandez;Nathaniel J. Williams;Gregory A. Aarons

  • From Classification to Causality: Advancing Understanding of Mechanisms of Change in Implementation Science

    Cara C Lewis;Predrag Klasnja;Byron J Powell;Aaron R Lyon

  • Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs

    Bryan J Weiner;Megan A Lewis;Laura A Linnan

  • Uncovering middle managers' role in healthcare innovation implementation

    Sarah A Birken;Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee;Bryan J Weiner

  • Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria.

    Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Sarah Fischer;Bryan J. Weiner;Cameo Stanick

  • Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review

    Sarah A. Birken;Byron J. Powell;Justin Presseau;M. Alexis Kirk;M. Alexis Kirk

  • Determinants of implementation effectiveness: adapting a framework for complex innovations.

    Christian D. Helfrich;Bryan J. Weiner;Martha M. McKinney;Lori Minasian

  • Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership.

    Bryan J. Weiner;Stephen M. Shortell;Jeffrey Alexander

  • Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

    Arianna Rubin Means;Christopher G. Kemp;Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore;Sarah Gimbel

  • Are You Ready? How Health Professionals Can Comprehensively Conceptualize Readiness for Change

    Daniel T. Holt;Christian D. Helfrich;Carmen G. Hall;Bryan J. Weiner

  • A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health

    Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Meredith R. Boyd;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Aaron R. Lyon

  • The Adoption of the Corporate Governance Model by Nonprofit Organizations

    Jeffrey A. Alexander;Bryan J. Weiner

  • The meaning and measurement of implementation climate

    Bryan J Weiner;Charles M Belden;Dawn M Bergmire;Matthew Johnston

  • Leadership in Collaborative Community Health Partnerships

    Jeffrey A Alexander;Maureen B Comfort;Bryan J Weiner;Richard J Bogue

  • Instrumentation issues in implementation science

    Ruben G Martinez;Cara C Lewis;Cara C Lewis;Bryan J Weiner

  • Quality Improvement Implementation and Hospital Performance on Quality Indicators

    Bryan J. Weiner;Jeffrey A. Alexander;Stephen M. Shortell;Laurence C. Baker

  • Developing measures to assess constructs from the Inner Setting domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Maria E. Fernandez;Timothy J. Walker;Bryan J. Weiner;William A. Calo

  • Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey

    Gail E Henderson;R Jean Cadigan;Teresa P Edwards;Ian Conlon

Frequent Co-Authors

Cara C. Lewis
Cara C. Lewis Kaiser Permanente
Jeffrey A. Alexander
Jeffrey A. Alexander University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Morris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Byron J. Powell
Byron J. Powell Washington University in St. Louis
Stephen M. Shortell
Stephen M. Shortell University of California, Berkeley
Maria E. Fernandez
Maria E. Fernandez The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Eugene Z. Oddone
Eugene Z. Oddone Duke University
Hayden B. Bosworth
Hayden B. Bosworth Duke University
Bryce B. Reeve
Bryce B. Reeve Duke University
Rinad S. Beidas
Rinad S. Beidas University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a new career in social sciences and humanities is more flexible than ever, thanks to a rising number of online degree programs. Many students now choose accelerated msw programs to quickly launch their careers as social workers, helping people and communities in need.

Psychology remains another popular field, and returning students can benefit from options like an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online. These programs allow you to enter the workforce sooner or pursue advanced study in counseling, therapy, or research.

If you are interested in mental health, specialized graduate programs such as a cacrep online masters in counseling offer rigorous, accredited pathways to careers in school, clinical, or rehabilitation counseling. Likewise, those passionate about supporting families might consider mft masters programs that focus on marriage and family therapy.

No matter your focus, these flexible online options can help you achieve your professional goals in the social sciences while balancing work, family, and other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan J. Weiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles