World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
40582
World Ranking
9171
National Ranking
4731

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
98
Citations
40829
World Ranking
106
National Ranking
52

Stephen M. Shortell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Shortell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 471 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stephen M. Shortell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Shortell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 1988 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Stephen M. Shortell is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley, in the United States. Their research contributions span various areas within the health professions and economics, econometrics and finance, with a particular focus on general health professions and economics and econometrics as subfields.

Their recent papers cover a range of topics related to healthcare systems, management, and performance. Selected works include:

  • Lean Management and Hospital Performance: Adoption vs. Implementation, 2021, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
  • Integrating network theory into the study of integrated healthcare, 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • Multi-level analysis of the learning health system: Integrating contributions from research on organizations and implementation, 2020, Learning Health Systems
  • Financial Integration's Impact On Care Delivery And Payment Reforms: A Survey Of Hospitals And Physician Practices, 2020, Health Affairs
  • Benchmarking outcomes on multiple contextual levels in lean healthcare: a systematic review, development of a conceptual framework, and a research agenda, 2021, BMC Health Services Research

Frequent co-authors working alongside Shortell include:

  • Hector P. Rodríguez
  • Thomas G. Rundall
  • Elina Reponen
  • Janet C. Blodgett
  • Elliott S. Fisher

The scientist has published multiple studies in notable venues, highlighting their concentration within certain journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Health Services Research
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Health Affairs
  • Medical Care
  • Quality Management in Health Care

Their main fields of study are categorized primarily under:

  • Health Professions
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Subfields within these categories further specify their expertise in:

  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Health Information Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

The primary topics addressed in their research include:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

In recognition of their contributions, Stephen M. Shortell was awarded membership in the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1988.

Best Publications

  • Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption

    James D. Westphal;Ranjay Gulati;Stephen M. Shortell

  • Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.

    Ewan B. Ferlie;Stephen M. Shortell

  • Crossing the quality chasm: implications for health services administration education.

    Bernard J Horak;William Welton;Stephen Shortell

  • Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians.

    Janet M. Dukerich;Brian R. Golden;Stephen M. Shortell

  • The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference?

    Stephen Shortell;Jack Zimmerman;Denise Rousseau;Robin Gillies

  • Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity.

    Stephen M. Shortell;Edward J. Zajac

  • Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation.

    S. M. Shortell;J. L. O'Brien;J. M. Carman;R. W. Foster

  • Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress.

    Stephen M. Shortell;Charles L. Bennett;Gayle R. Byck

  • Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications

    Edward J. Zajac;Stephen M. Shortell

  • Quality collaboratives: lessons from research

    John C Ovretveit;Paul Bate;Paul Cleary;Shan Cretin

  • Organizational assessment in intensive care units (ICUs): construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU nurse-physician questionnaire.

    Stephen M. Shortell;Denise M. Rousseau;Robin R. Gillies;Kelly J. Devers

  • External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients With Chronic Diseases

    Lawrence Casalino;Robin R. Gillies;Stephen M. Shortell;Julie A. Schmittdiel

  • The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: a typology for research, policy, and practice

    Shannon M. Mitchell;Stephen M. Shortell

  • Primary Care and Accountable Care — Two Essential Elements of Delivery-System Reform

    Diane R Rittenhouse;Stephen M Shortell;Elliott S Fisher

  • The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care

    Stephen M. Shortell;Jill A. Marsteller;Michael Lin;Marjorie L. Pearson

  • The Patient-Centered Medical Home: Will It Stand the Test of Health Reform?

    Diane R. Rittenhouse;Stephen M. Shortell

  • Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system

    Gary J. Young;Martin P. Charns;Stephen M. Shortell

  • A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos.

    G J Bazzoli;S M Shortell;N Dubbs;C Chan

  • Assessing the Impact of Total Quality Management and Organizational Culture on Multiple Outcomes of Care for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patients

    Stephen M. Shortell;Robert H. Jones;Alfred W. Rademaker;Robin R. Gillies

  • The Top Patient Safety Strategies That Can Be Encouraged for Adoption Now

    Paul G. Shekelle;Peter J. Pronovost;Robert M. Wachter;Kathryn M. McDonald

  • The New World of Managed Care: Creating Organized Delivery Systems

    Stephen M. Shortell;Robin R. Gillies;David A. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas G. Rundall
Thomas G. Rundall University of California, Berkeley
Jeffrey A. Alexander
Jeffrey A. Alexander University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gloria J. Bazzoli
Gloria J. Bazzoli Virginia Commonwealth University
Elliott S. Fisher
Elliott S. Fisher Dartmouth College
Douglas A. Conrad
Douglas A. Conrad University of Washington
Denise M. Rousseau
Denise M. Rousseau Carnegie Mellon University
Bryan J. Weiner
Bryan J. Weiner University of Washington
Lawton R. Burns
Lawton R. Burns University of Pennsylvania
Laurence C. Baker
Laurence C. Baker Stanford University
Richard M. Scheffler
Richard M. Scheffler University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to rewarding and flexible career pathways. Many students explore online education options, which can offer both affordability and speed. If you're interested in clinical or community support work, consider the most affordable online msw programs. These allow you to earn a Master’s in Social Work without the financial strain of traditional on-campus study.

Specializing further, those with a passion for behavior analysis can benefit from bcba online masters programs, which prepare graduates for roles in counseling, education, and healthcare. For those eager to fast-track their education, several social work accelerated program options allow ambitious students to enter the workforce more quickly.

Psychology remains a popular major, and a fast track bachelor degree in psychology can give you a head start in counseling, human resources, or research-based careers. Online pathways provide flexibility, allowing you to balance studies with work or family commitments while preparing for diverse roles in both public and private sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Shortell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles