World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
13686
World Ranking
8044
National Ranking
4305

Nathan A. Bowling publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan A. Bowling sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nathan A. Bowling D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan A. Bowling sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan A. Bowling is affiliated with Wright State University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Psychology and Business, Management and Accounting, with a notable focus on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and Applied Psychology. The body of their work reflects a diverse engagement with topics related to job satisfaction, behavioral health, social and intergroup psychology, workplace violence, personality traits, psychological well-being, and safety measures.

Recent publications by Nathan A. Bowling include the following papers:

  • Will the Questions Ever End? Person-Level Increases in Careless Responding During Questionnaire Completion (2020, Organizational Research Methods)
  • The Quick and the Careless: The Construct Validity of Page Time as a Measure of Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys (2021, Organizational Research Methods)
  • Measuring General Job Satisfaction: Which Is More Construct Valid-Global Scales or Facet-Composite Scales? (2021, Journal of Business and Psychology)
  • Stop With the Questions Already! Does Data Quality Suffer for Scales Positioned Near the End of a Lengthy Questionnaire? (2022, Journal of Business and Psychology)

The frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Bowling across multiple publications include:

  • Gary N. Burns
  • Lucian Zelazny
  • Jason L. Huang
  • Jesse S. Michel
  • Michael A. Rotch

Bowling's research outputs have been published mainly in a handful of academic journals. These include:

  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Organizational Research Methods
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Occupational Health Science
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Their scholarly work often addresses complex issues in organizational and social psychology, with particular emphasis on job satisfaction and organizational behavior. The investigation into behavioral health interventions and social dynamics within workplaces complements this focus, while studies on workplace violence, personality traits, and psychological well-being add further dimensions to their research profile.

Best Publications

  • Workplace harassment from the victim's perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis.

    Nathan A. Bowling;Terry A. Beehr

  • Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis

    Gene Alarcon;Kevin J. Eschleman;Nathan A. Bowling

  • A meta‐analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well‐being

    Nathan A. Bowling;Kevin J. Eschleman;Qiang Wang

  • Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope

    Gene M. Alarcon;Nathan A. Bowling;Steven Khazon

  • A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Construct Validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale.

    Nathan A. Bowling;Gregory D. Hammond

  • Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data

    Jason L. Huang;Mengqiao Liu;Nathan A. Bowling

  • A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem

    Nathan A. Bowling;Kevin J. Eschleman;Qiang Wang;Cristina Kirkendall

  • Is the job satisfaction–job performance relationship spurious? A meta-analytic examination ☆

    Nathan A. Bowling

  • A meta-analytic examination of hardiness.

    Kevin J. Eschleman;Nathan A. Bowling;Gene M. Alarcon

  • A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control.

    Qiang Wang;Nathan A. Bowling;Kevin J. Eschleman

  • A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload

    Nathan A. Bowling;Gene M. Alarcon;Caleb B. Bragg;Michael J. Hartman

  • Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior.

    Nathan A. Bowling;Kevin J. Eschleman

  • A meta‐analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes

    Zachary T. Kalinoski;Debra Steele‐Johnson;Elizabeth J. Peyton;Keith A. Leas

  • Occupational stress and failures of social support: when helping hurts.

    Terry A. Beehr;Nathan A. Bowling;Misty M. Bennett

  • Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding with an Infrequency Scale: Evaluating Validity and Participant Reactions

    Jason L. Huang;Nathan A. Bowling;Mengqiao Liu;Yuhui Li

  • Giving and receiving social support at work: The roles of personality and reciprocity.

    Nathan A. Bowling;Terry A. Beehr;William M. Swader

  • Effects of Job Satisfaction and Conscientiousness on Extra-Role Behaviors

    Nathan A. Bowling

  • Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.

    Nathan A. Bowling;Jason L. Huang;Caleb B. Bragg;Steve Khazon

  • Overlooked issues in the conceptualization and measurement of counterproductive work behavior

    Nathan A. Bowling;Melissa L. Gruys

  • Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates' responses to abusive supervision

    Nathan A. Bowling;Jesse S. Michel

  • A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem

    N.A. Bowling

Frequent Co-Authors

Terry A. Beehr
Terry A. Beehr Central Michigan University
Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. Judge The Ohio State University
Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Russell A. Matthews
Russell A. Matthews University of Alabama
Junqi Shi
Junqi Shi Zhejiang University
Norbert K. Semmer
Norbert K. Semmer University of Bern
Ho Kwong Kwan
Ho Kwong Kwan China Europe International Business School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to many rewarding careers. One of the fastest-growing paths is behavior analysis, which is in high demand across the United States. Pursuing a graduate degree in psychology or a related field can lead to opportunities such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

Requirements for this career may differ depending on where you want to practice. If you’re interested in becoming a bcba in Lincoln or becoming a bcba in Long Beach, you’ll need to meet specific academic and supervised experience requirements. For those in California, learning how to become a bcba in Los Angeles can offer insights into local licensure and credentialing processes.

If you’re considering a career in Kentucky, be sure to review the bcba certification requirements in Louisville to understand the steps needed. With flexible online degree options, launching a career in psychology or behavior analysis is now more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan A. Bowling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles