World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
10922
World Ranking
7426
National Ranking
67

Guy Notelaers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Notelaers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Guy Notelaers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Notelaers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy Notelaers is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway. Their research activity spans multiple fields including Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, and Psychology. Within these broad fields, their work particularly focuses on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Demography.

Notelaers' research centers on key topics related to workplace dynamics and occupational health. These include Workplace Violence and Bullying, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression, Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment, Occupational Health and Safety Research, Workplace Health and Well-being, and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies.

The scientist has contributed to several frequently published venues, demonstrating a research focus across multiple journals. These venues include:

  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Work & Stress
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology

Notelaers has collaborated repeatedly with a group of coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Elfi Baillien
  • Denise Salin
  • Ståle Einarsen
  • Zselyke Pap
  • Delia Vîrgă

Their recent papers cover nuanced aspects of workplace bullying and psychological well-being. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Does bystander behavior make a difference? How passive and active bystanders in the group moderate the effects of bullying exposure." (2021) published in Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • "Friend or foe? The impact of high-performance work practices on workplace bullying" (2020) published in Human Resource Management Journal
  • "The influence of target personality in the development of workplace bullying." (2021) published in Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • "Aggression and Psychological Distress in Male and Female Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Users: A Multigroup Latent Class Analysis" (2021) published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Workplace bullying as predicted by non-prototypicality, group identification and norms: a self-categorisation perspective" (2020) published in Work & Stress

In addition to journal articles, Notelaers has contributed to academic books. One such book publication is "Concepts, Approaches and Methods" released by Springer Nature in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised

    Staale Einarsen;Helge Hoel;Guy Notelaers

  • Empirical Findings on Prevalence and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace

    Dieter Zapf;Jordi Escartín;Ståle Einarsen;Helge Hoel

  • The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour

    Merethe Schanke Aasland;Anders Skogstad;Guy Notelaers;Morten Birkeland Nielsen

  • Should I stay or should I go? Examining longitudinal relations among job resources and work engagement for stayers versus movers

    Annet H. de Lange;Hans De Witte;Guy Notelaers;Guy Notelaers

  • Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach

    Guy Notelaers;Stale Einarsen;Hans De Witte;Jeroen K. Vermunt

  • Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Anders Skogstad;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Lars Glasø

  • Job insecurity and employability in fixed-term contractors, agency workers, and permanent workers: Associations with job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment.

    Nele De Cuyper;Guy Notelaers;Hans De Witte

  • Leadership and Fulfillment of the Three Basic Psychological Needs at Work.

    Hilde Hetland;Jørn Hetland;Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Ståle Pallesen

  • Measuring Exposure to Workplace Bullying

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Guy Notelaers;Ståle Einarsen

  • Job insecurity and employee health: The buffering potential of job control and job self-efficacy

    Bert Herman Schreurs;Hetty van Emmerik;Guy Notelaers;Hans De Witte

  • A job characteristics approach to explain workplace bullying

    Guy Notelaers;Hans De Witte;Stale Einarsen

  • The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised in a representative sample

    Guy Notelaers;Ståle Einarsen

  • Workplace Bullying and Suicidal Ideation: A 3-Wave Longitudinal Norwegian Study

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Geir Høstmark Nielsen;Guy Notelaers;Ståle Einarsen

  • Leadership and role stressors as departmental level predictors of workplace bullying.

    Lars Johan Hauge;Ståle Einarsen;Stein Knardahl;Bjørn Lau

  • Measuring bullying at work with the short-negative acts questionnaire: identification of targets and criterion validity

    Guy Notelaers;Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden;Helge Hoel;Ståle Einarsen

  • The Food Choice Questionnaire: Factorial invariant over western urban populations?

    Audrey Eertmans;An Victoir;Guy Notelaers;Greet Vansant

  • Implications of Family Business Employment for Employees’ Innovative Work Involvement

    Yannick Bammens;Guy Notelaers;Anita Van Gils

  • Job demands-resources and early retirement intention: Differences between blue- and white-collar workers

    Bert Herman Schreurs;Hetty Van Emmerik;Nele De Cuyper;Guy Notelaers

  • Sexual Harassment: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Gender Differences Assessed by Three Different Estimation Methods

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Brita Bjørkelo;Guy Notelaers;Ståle Einarsen

  • Choosing a Major in Higher Education: Profiles of Students' Decision-Making Process.

    Veerle Germeijs;Koen Luyckx;Guy Notelaers;Luc Goossens

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Ståle Einarsen
Ståle Einarsen University of Bergen
Jeroen K. Vermunt
Jeroen K. Vermunt Tilburg University
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
Morten Birkeland Nielsen
Morten Birkeland Nielsen National Institute of Occupational Health
Anders Skogstad
Anders Skogstad University of Bergen
Roland Pepermans
Roland Pepermans Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Alfredo Rodríguez-Muñoz
Alfredo Rodríguez-Muñoz Complutense University of Madrid
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career options. With a psychology background, you might choose paths such as social work or counseling, both of which offer unique opportunities and requirements depending on your state.

For example, those interested in becoming a social worker can learn more about how to become a social worker in Wyoming, which details the key steps and educational requirements specific to Wyoming.

If your goal is counseling, each state sets its own licensure standards and opportunities for fast-track programs. To discover the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Alabama, or to learn about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Alaska, there are specific resources that break down these pathways.

For those looking to study or practice in the Southwest, be sure to read about the Arizona fastest counseling programs and how to start your career there.

When choosing an online degree or career in psychology, always check your state’s requirements and available programs to set yourself up for success.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Notelaers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles