World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stig Berge Matthiesen

Stig Berge Matthiesen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
8742
World Ranking
10726
National Ranking
106

Stig Berge Matthiesen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stig Berge Matthiesen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stig Berge Matthiesen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stig Berge Matthiesen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Psychology and Education

Overview

Stig Berge Matthiesen is affiliated with the BI Norwegian Business School in Norway. Their research primarily spans the social sciences and health professions, with a focus on occupational health and safety, workplace violence and bullying, and organizational behavior related to job satisfaction and well-being.

Their academic work explores several main topics, including:

  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Matthiesen has contributed to research in several subfields, including sociology and political science, general health professions, gender studies, radiological and ultrasound technology, as well as statistics, probability, and uncertainty.

Their recent publications showcase a variety of research interests. These include:

  • "Passive avoidant leadership and safety non-compliance: A 30 days diary study among naval cadets" (2020) published in Safety Science
  • "Perceived job insecurity climate in uncertain times: implications for work-related health among leaders versus non-leaders" (2023) published in Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • "Attachment styles and leader-member exchange: Investigating the principle of attachment-system activation." (2023) published in Psychology of Leaders and Leadership
  • "#HeToo? Men trivialize cases of sexual harassment by a female aggressor toward a male victim, but women do not" (2025) published in SN Business & Economics

The researcher collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Mads Nordmo Arnestad, Olav Kjellevold Olsen, Jørn Hetland, Øystein Løvik Hoprekstad, and Roar Espevik, reflecting a network that spans diverse issues within workplace safety, leadership, and social dynamics.

Matthiesen's work has appeared in a range of academic journals, among which are:

  • Safety Science
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • Psychology of Leaders and Leadership
  • SN Business & Economics

Recognition of Matthiesen's academic contributions includes membership in the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, specifically within the fields of psychology and education.

Best Publications

  • Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study

    Ståle Einarsen;Bj⊘rn Inge Raknes;Stig Berge Matthiesen

  • The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta‐analysis

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Ståle Einarsen

  • Psychiatric distress and symptoms of PTSD among victims of bullying at work

    Stig Berge Matthiesen;Stale Einarsen

  • MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work

    Stig Berge Matthiesen;Ståle Einarsen

  • Perpetrators and Targets of Bullying at Work: Role Stress and Individual Differences

    Stig Berge Matthiesen;Ståle Einarsen

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder as a consequence of bullying at work and at school. A literature review and meta-analysis

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Tone Tangen;Thormod Idsoe;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Stig Berge Matthiesen

  • Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Anders Skogstad;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Lars Glasø

  • PERSONALITY CORRELATES OF WORKAHOLISM

    Ronald J. Burke;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Stale Pallesen

  • Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile

    Lars Glasø;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Ståle Einarsen

  • Longitudinal relationships between workplace bullying and psychological distress.

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Jørn Hetland;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Ståle Einarsen

  • Workplace bullying as an antecedent to job insecurity and intention to leave: a 6‐month prospective study

    Mats Glambek;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Jørn Hetland;Ståle Einarsen

  • Sense of coherence as a protective mechanism among targets of workplace bullying.

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Ståle Einarsen

  • Predicting proactive behaviour at work: Exploring the role of personality as an antecedent of whistleblowing behaviour

    Brita Bjørkelo;Ståle Einarsen;Stig Berge Matthiesen

  • Bullying in the workplace: definition, prevalence, antecedents and consequences

    Stig Berge Matthiesen;Ståle Einarsen

  • The relative effects of constructive, laissez-faire, and tyrannical leadership on subordinate job satisfaction: Results from two prospective and representative studies.

    Anders Skogstad;Merethe Schanke Aasland;Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Jørn Hetland

  • Using the Job Demands-Resources model to investigate risk perception, safety climate and job satisfaction in safety critical organizations

    Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Kathryn J. Mearns;Kathryn J. Mearns;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Jarle Eid

  • ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES: A PRECURSOR OF BULLYING AT WORK?

    Anders Skogstad;Stig Berge Matthiesen;Stale Einarsen

  • Silence is golden? Characteristics and experiences of self-reported whistleblowers.

    Brita Bjørkelo;Ståle Einarsen;Morten Birkeland Nielsen;Stig Berge Matthiesen

  • Similarities and differences in mothers' and fathers' grief following the death of an infant

    Atle Dyregrov;Stig Berge Matthiesen

  • Workaholism among Norwegian journalists: antecedents and consequences

    Ronald J. Burke;Stig Matthiesen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ståle Einarsen
Ståle Einarsen University of Bergen
Morten Birkeland Nielsen
Morten Birkeland Nielsen National Institute of Occupational Health
Ronald J. Burke
Ronald J. Burke York University
Atle Dyregrov
Atle Dyregrov University of Bergen
Anders Skogstad
Anders Skogstad University of Bergen
Jørn Hetland
Jørn Hetland University of Bergen
Leif Edvard Aarø
Leif Edvard Aarø Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Jarle Eid
Jarle Eid University of Bergen
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology or counseling starts with the right degree—often more accessible than you think. With online education now widely available, students can pursue their studies remotely, which is convenient and often more affordable than traditional options.

Cost is a key concern for many aspiring professionals. If you are looking for affordable programs, you can compare the cheapest online counseling programs in New York and see how they stack up against the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania. Students based in cities may also explore the cheapest online counseling degrees in Philadelphia for localized options.

Options aren’t limited to the Northeast. Anyone considering southern schools should review the affordable online counseling programs in Texas to find cost-effective pathways.

Whether you’re aiming to become a licensed counselor, psychologist, or enter another mental health role, a flexible and affordable online program can help launch your career without excessive financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Stig Berge Matthiesen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles