World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
16780
World Ranking
3369
National Ranking
227

Jana Sillmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Sillmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 138 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jana Sillmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Sillmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jana Sillmann is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a substantial emphasis on global and planetary change as well as atmospheric science. Their contributions extend into several specialized subfields including health, toxicology, and mutagenesis, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and economics and econometrics.

The main topics covered in Jana Sillmann's research include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Flood risk assessment and management
  • Climate change and health impacts
  • Climate change policy and economics

The scientist's publication record shows a pattern of frequent contributions to several academic venues. The most common outlets for their work are:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Climate Risk Management
  • Earth's Future

Jana Sillmann has coauthored numerous articles with several recurring collaborators. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Anton Orlov
  • Anne Sophie Daloz
  • Clemens Schwingshackl
  • Bart van den Hurk
  • Benjamin Poschlod

Among recent papers, the following are notable publications, listed with their year and venue:

  • Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Evaluation of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble for climate extreme indices, 2020, Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Perspectives on tipping points in integrated models of the natural and human Earth system: cascading effects and telecoupling, 2021, Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections

    J. Sillmann;V. V. Kharin;F. W. Zwiers;X. Zhang

  • Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate

    J. Sillmann;V. V. Kharin;X. Zhang;F. W. Zwiers

  • Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems

    O. Hoegh-Guldberg;D. Jacob;M. Bindi;S. Brown

  • Frequency of extreme precipitation increases extensively with event rareness under global warming.

    Gunnar Myhre;Kari Alterskjær;Camilla Weum Stjern;Øivind Hodnebrog

  • Magnitude of extreme heat waves in present climate and their projection in a warming world

    Simone Russo;Alessandro Dosio;Rune G. Graversen;Jana Sillmann

  • Top ten European heatwaves since 1950 and their occurrence in the coming decades

    Simone Russo;Jana Sillmann;Erich M Fischer

  • Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework.

    Brian C. O'Neill;Brian C. O'Neill;Timothy R. Carter;Kristie L. Ebi;Paula A. Harrison

  • Evaluation of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble for climate extreme indices

    Yeon-Hee Kim;Seung-Ki Min;Xuebin Zhang;Jana Sillmann

  • Blocking and its Response to Climate Change

    Tim Woollings;David E. Barriopedro;John Methven;Seok-Woo Son

  • Indices for extreme events in projections of anthropogenic climate change

    J. Sillmann;E. Roeckner

  • Understanding, modeling and predicting weather and climate extremes: Challenges and opportunities

    Jana Sillmann;Thordis Thorarinsdottir;Noel Keenlyside;Nathalie Schaller

  • Percentile indices for assessing changes in heavy precipitation events

    Christoph Schär;Nikolina Ban;Erich M. Fischer;Jan Rajczak

  • Humid heat waves at different warming levels

    Simone Russo;Jana Sillmann;Andreas Sterl

  • Extreme Cold Winter Temperatures in Europe under the Influence of North Atlantic Atmospheric Blocking

    Jana Sillmann;Mischa Croci-Maspoli;Malaak Kallache;Richard W. Katz

  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble

    Robert Vautard;Nikolay Kadygrov;Carley Iles;Fredrik Boberg

  • The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results

    Benjamin S. Kravitz;Alan Robock;S. Tilmes;Olivier Boucher

  • When will unusual heat waves become normal in a warming Africa

    Simone Russo;Andrea F Marchese;J Sillmann;Giuseppina Immé

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Rita Nogherotto;James M. Ciarlo;Filippo Giorgi

  • Consistency of Temperature and Precipitation Extremes across Various Global Gridded In Situ and Reanalysis Datasets

    Markus G. Donat;Jana Sillmann;Simon Wild;Lisa V. Alexander

  • PDRMIP: A Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project, Protocol and preliminary results.

    G. Myhre;P. M. Forster;B. H. Samset;Ø. Hodnebrog

  • Percentile indices for assessing changes in heavy precipitation events

    Christoph Schär;Nikolina Ban;Jan Rajczak;Jürg Schmidli

Frequent Co-Authors

Øivind Hodnebrog
Øivind Hodnebrog Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Francis W. Zwiers
Francis W. Zwiers University of Victoria
Viatcheslav V. Kharin
Viatcheslav V. Kharin Environment and Climate Change Canada
Piers M. Forster
Piers M. Forster University of Leeds
Xuebin Zhang
Xuebin Zhang University of Victoria
Jakob Zscheischler
Jakob Zscheischler Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from additional qualifications. For professionals looking to advance without the extensive commitment of a dissertation, exploring a doctorate degree online no dissertation can be a practical option. This flexibility allows students to focus on applied knowledge and leadership roles.

Educators aiming to deepen their expertise might consider transitioning from an EdS to an EdD program. Resources highlighting top eds to edd program pathways can help identify reputable online options tailored to environmental education and policy.

For those interested in social impact, especially within community and environmental health, affordable specialized doctorates like the cheapest online dsw programs offer valuable credentials without a hefty price tag. These programs enhance leadership skills in social and environmental justice roles.

Finally, students exploring broad interdisciplinary approaches may find pursuing one of the most affordable online general studies degree programs advantageous. Such degrees provide flexibility and a wide-ranging foundation that supports various career transitions within environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jana Sillmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles