World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
7696
World Ranking
5760
National Ranking
3118

William J. Chopik publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Chopik sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 260 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

William J. Chopik D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Chopik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Chopik is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with notable contributions in the subfields of Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Personality Traits and Psychology

William J. Chopik has published extensively. Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Collabra Psychology
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • European Journal of Personality

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations (2020), Journal of Personality
  • To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply? (2021), Nature Human Behaviour
  • Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability (2020), Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Change Goals Robustly Predict Trait Growth: A Mega-Analysis of a Dozen Intensive Longitudinal Studies Examining Volitional Change (2020), Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Age and gender differences in narcissism: A comprehensive study across eight measures and over 250,000 participants (2023), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

William J. Chopik frequently collaborates with other researchers. Some of their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jeewon Oh
  • Rebekka Weidmann
  • Mariah F. Purol
  • Richard E. Lucas
  • Eric S. Kim

Best Publications

  • The Benefits of Social Technology Use Among Older Adults Are Mediated by Reduced Loneliness

    William J. Chopik

  • The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

    Hannah Moshontz;Lorne Campbell;Charles R. Ebersole;Hans Ijzerman

  • Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries

    William J. Chopik;Ed O’Brien;Sara H. Konrath

  • From the cradle to the grave: age differences in attachment from early adulthood to old age.

    William J. Chopik;Robin S. Edelstein;R. Chris Fraley

  • Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations.

    Eranda Jayawickreme;Frank J. Infurna;Kinan Alajak;Laura E.R. Blackie

  • To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply?

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;Jessica K. Flake;Marco Tullio Liuzza

  • Changes in Adult Attachment Styles in American College Students Over Time A Meta-Analysis

    Sara H. Konrath;William J. Chopik;Courtney K. Hsing;Ed O’Brien

  • Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples.

    Marius Leckelt;Eunike Wetzel;Tanja M. Gerlach;Robert A. Ackerman

  • Sociosexuality moderates the association between testosterone and relationship status in men and women.

    Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik;Emily L. Kean

  • Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy

    Amy C. Moors;Terri D. Conley;Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik

  • Associations among relational values, support, health, and well-being across the adult lifespan

    William J. Chopik

  • You have to follow through: Attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change

    Nathan W. Hudson;Daniel A. Briley;William J. Chopik;Jaime Derringer

  • Gratitude across the life span: Age differences and links to subjective well-being

    William J Chopik;Nicky J Newton;Lindsay H Ryan;Todd B Kashdan

  • A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ke Wang;Amit Goldenberg;Charles A. Dorison;Jeremy K. Miller

  • Changes in Optimism Are Associated with Changes in Health Over Time Among Older Adults

    William J. Chopik;Eric S. Kim;Jacqui Smith

  • Dyadic associations between testosterone and relationship quality in couples.

    Robin S. Edelstein;Sari M. van Anders;William J. Chopik;Katherine L. Goldey

  • Prenatal hormones in first‐time expectant parents: Longitudinal changes and within‐couple correlations

    Robin S. Edelstein;Britney M. Wardecker;William J. Chopik;Amy C. Moors

  • Age Differences in Explicit and Implicit Age Attitudes Across the Life Span.

    William J. Chopik;Hannah L. Giasson

  • Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability

    Charles R. Ebersole;Maya B. Mathur;Erica Baranski;Diane-Jo Bart-Plange

  • Was That Cheating? Perceptions Vary by Sex, Attachment Anxiety, and Behavior

    Daniel J. Kruger;Maryanne L. Fisher;Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik

  • Fathers' decline in testosterone and synchrony with partner testosterone during pregnancy predicts greater postpartum relationship investment.

    Darby E. Saxbe;Robin S. Edelstein;Hannah M. Lyden;Britney M. Wardecker

  • Personality change across the life span: Insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study

    William J. Chopik;Shinobu Kitayama

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin S. Edelstein
Robin S. Edelstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard E. Lucas
Richard E. Lucas Michigan State University
Heather L. Urry
Heather L. Urry Tufts University
Daniel A. Briley
Daniel A. Briley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
R. Chris Fraley
R. Chris Fraley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jacqui Smith
Jacqui Smith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Igor Grossmann
Igor Grossmann University of Waterloo
Mitja D. Back
Mitja D. Back University of Münster
Lorne Campbell
Lorne Campbell University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to numerous specialized online degrees and diverse career paths. A popular option is pursuing careers with a master's degree in behavioral psychology, which prepares graduates for roles in counseling, mental health services, or behavior analysis. This pathway emphasizes practical skills for supporting individuals in various settings.

Another niche yet growing field is military psychology career paths. Professionals in this area work closely with military personnel, helping them manage stress, trauma, and transition issues. This unique role combines psychological expertise with an understanding of military environments.

For those interested in brain science, neuropsychology is a rewarding area to consider. Understanding neuropsychology salary trends is essential, as this career often requires advanced education but offers strong compensation and opportunities for research or clinical work.

Additionally, organizational psychology brings psychological principles into the workplace. Investigating organizational psychology salary insights can help you determine if helping companies boost productivity and employee well-being aligns with your goals.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Chopik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles