World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
20157
World Ranking
16308
National Ranking
8201

Edward M. Copeland publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Copeland sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 480 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward M. Copeland D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Copeland sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward M. Copeland is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States, where their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with notable contributions in Oncology and related subfields.

Their research encompasses several key subfields, including Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Physiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. The topics addressed in their work cover Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection, Biomedical Ethics and Regulation, Health and Medical Research Impacts, and the History of Medical Practice.

Edward M. Copeland has published in various respected venues, with a significant number of papers appearing in Annals of Surgical Oncology and The American Surgeon. These journals are well-regarded within the surgical and oncology research communities.

  • Impact on Breast Cancer Survival by Surgical Facility Type Secondary to the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial, 2022, The American Surgeon
  • John M. Daly, MD: The Wise and Gentleman Surgeon, 2022, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • The Pivotal Leadership of Doctors R. Lee Clark and Murray M. Copeland in Transforming the Commission on Cancer (1955-1965), 2022, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology Heroes and Legends: Edward M. Copeland III, MD, as Interviewed by Kirby I. Bland, MD, FACS, MAMSE, 2024, Annals of Surgical Oncology

Frequent collaborators include Alana Hofmann, Huazhi Liu, Darwin Ang, Charles M. Balch, and David P. Winchester, reflecting a network of multidisciplinary partnerships across oncology and surgical research.

Best Publications

  • Neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma of the skin. Its natural history, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Charles L Hitchcock;Kirby I. Bland;Robert G. Laney;Daisy Franzini

  • Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer.

    Jose G. Guillem;David B. Chessin;Alfred M. Cohen;Jinru Shia

  • Structural and hormonal alterations in the gastrointestinal tract of parenterally fed rats.

    Leonard R. Johnson;Edward M. Copeland;Stanley J. Dudrick;Lenard M. Lichtenberger

  • The role of glutamine in maintaining a healthy gut and supporting the metabolic response to injury and infection

    Wiley W. Souba;Wiley W. Souba;V.Suzanne Klimberg;V.Suzanne Klimberg;Donald A. Plumley;Donald A. Plumley;Rabih M. Salloum;Rabih M. Salloum

  • Nuclear factor-κB is upregulated in colorectal cancer

    D.Scott Lind;Steven N. Hochwald;John Malaty;Stelio Rekkas

  • Oral glutamine accelerates healing of the small intestine and improves outcome after whole abdominal radiation.

    V. Suzanne Klimberg;Rabih M. Salloum;Michael Kasper;Donald A. Plumley

  • The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases

    Kiby I. Bland;Edward M. Copeland

  • Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

    Edward M Copeland;Leonard D. Miller;Rayford S. Jones

  • Proinflammatory cytokines, nutritional support, and the cachexia syndrome : Interactions and therapeutic options

    Lyle L. Moldawer;Edward M. Copeland

  • Retractable-barb needle for breast lesion localization: use in 60 cases.

    E J Urrutia;M C Hawkins;B G Steinbach;M A Meacham

  • Oral glutamine reduces bacterial translocation following abdominal radiation.

    Wiley W. Souba;V.Suzanne Klimberg;R.Dean Hautamaki;William H. Mendenhall

  • Action of Gastrin on Gastrointestinal Structure and Function

    Leonard R. Johnson;Lenard M. Lichtenberger;Edward M. Copeland;Stanley J. Dudrick

  • Nutrition as an Adjunct to Cancer Treatment in the Adult

    Edward M. Copeland;John M. Daly;Stanley J. Dudrick

  • Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) : Why map DCIS? Discussion

    Charles E. Cox;Keoni Nguyen;Richard J. Gray;Christopher Salud

  • Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT).

    Stephen G. Swisher;Wayne Hofstetter;Tsung T. Wu;Arlene M. Correa

  • Interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 antagonism in sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and septic shock.

    Jeffrey H. Pruitt;Edward M. Copeland;Lyle L. Moldawer

  • Effect of intravenous hyperalimentation on established delayed hypersensitivity in the cancer patient.

    Edward M. Copeland;Bruce V. Mac Fadyen;Stanley J. Dudrick

  • Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins.

    Juan C. Cendán;Dominique Coco;Edward M. Copeland

  • Transanal excision of locally advanced rectal cancers downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

    Scott R Schell;Robert A Zlotecki;William M Mendenhall;Robert W Marsh

  • Intravenous hyperalimentation as an adjunct to cancer chemotherapy.

    Edward M. Copeland;Bruce V. MacFadyen;Victor J. Lanzotti;Stanley J. Dudrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirby I. Bland
Kirby I. Bland University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lyle L. Moldawer
Lyle L. Moldawer University of Florida
William M. Mendenhall
William M. Mendenhall University of Florida
Rodney R. Million
Rodney R. Million University of Florida
Michael J. Clare-Salzler
Michael J. Clare-Salzler University of Florida
Jean Nicolas Vauthey
Jean Nicolas Vauthey The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Eddie K. Abdalla
Eddie K. Abdalla Northside Hospital
Lee M. Ellis
Lee M. Ellis The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jordan U. Gutterman
Jordan U. Gutterman The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Evan M. Hersh
Evan M. Hersh The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of healthcare careers beyond becoming a doctor. Many students explore alternative pathways that still make a huge impact in the field. For example, you might want to know what’s the easiest nursing program to get into? This option can help you start your career quickly while still working directly with patients.

Some nursing schools are more accessible because they waive certain standardized test requirements. If you’re curious, learn more about nursing schools that don’t require TEAS or HESI for admission.

Not all essential healthcare careers involve direct patient care. Many students wonder, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? This path is perfect for those interested in healthcare administration, documentation, and compliance.

Finally, if you’re aiming for a leadership or administrative role, a Healthcare Administration Associate Degree online is a fast, flexible route into management positions within hospitals, clinics, or insurance companies.

Best Scientists Citing Edward M. Copeland

Trending Scientists