World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
19898
World Ranking
18135
National Ranking
9041

Alfred M. Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfred M. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 160 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Alfred M. Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfred M. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alfred M. Cohen is affiliated with Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals based in the United States. Their professional activities are primarily connected to this institution.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to Alfred M. Cohen. Similarly, no book publications have been documented under their name.

Data does not indicate any specific main fields of study, subfields, or topics of work attributed to Alfred M. Cohen, and there are no records of awards or distinctions granted to them. Based on the available information, Alfred M. Cohen is noted as currently living.

Best Publications

  • Liver resection for colorectal metastases.

    Y Fong;A M Cohen;J G Fortner;W E Enker

  • Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum.

    Klaas Havenga;Warren E. Enker;Warren E. Enker;Katherine McDermott;Alfred M. Cohen

  • Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis.

    Robert Martin;Philip Paty;Yuman Fong;Andrew Grace

  • Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer.

    Jose G. Guillem;David B. Chessin;Alfred M. Cohen;Jinru Shia

  • Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients.

    Spiros P Hiotis;Sharon M Weber;Alfred M Cohen;Bruce D Minsky

  • Long-Term Results of Local Excision for Rectal Cancer

    Philip B. Paty;Garrett M. Nash;Paul Baron;Maureen Zakowski

  • Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon and rectum.

    P. E. Bernick;D. S. Klimstra;J. Shia;B. Minsky

  • Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service.

    Warren E. Enker;Nipun Merchant;Alfred M. Cohen;Nicole M. Lanouette

  • Elective bowel resection for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: prognostic variables for asymptomatic patients.

    Leyo Ruo;Christina Gougoutas;Philip B Paty;Jose G Guillem

  • Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy

    Leyo Ruo;Satish Tickoo;David S. Klimstra;Bruce D. Minsky

  • Loss of basement membrane type IV collagen is associated with increased expression of metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP-2 and MMP-9) during human colorectal tumorigenesis.

    Zhao-Shi Zeng;Alfred M. Cohen;José G. Guillem

  • Antibody targeting in metastatic colon cancer: a phase I study of monoclonal antibody F19 against a cell-surface protein of reactive tumor stromal fibroblasts.

    S Welt;C R Divgi;A M Scott;P Garin-Chesa

  • Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer

    Jeffrey T. Brodsky;Gene K. Richard;Alfred M. Cohen;Bruce D. Minsky

  • Utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases

    Yuman Fong;Pierre F Saldinger;Timothy Akhurst;Homer Macapinlac

  • T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery?

    David J. Bentrem;Satoshi Okabe;W. Douglas Wong;Jose G. Guillem

  • Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis: long term follow-up.

    Raquel Wagman;Bruce D Minsky;Alfred M Cohen;Jose G Guillem

  • A randomized trial of intrahepatic infusion of fluorodeoxyuridine with dexamethasone versus fluorodeoxyuridine alone in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

    Nancy Kemeny;Karen Seiter;Donna Niedzwiecki;Doug Chapman

  • Rectus Flap Reconstruction Decreases Perineal Wound Complications After Pelvic Chemoradiation and Surgery: A Cohort Study

    David B. Chessin;John Hartley;Alfred M. Cohen;Madhu Mazumdar

  • Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy.

    Harvey G. Moore;Elyn Riedel;Bruce D. Minsky;Leonard Saltz

  • Prediction of colorectal cancer relapse and survival via tissue RNA levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9.

    Zhao Shi Zeng;Y. Huang;A. M. Cohen;J. G. Guillem

Frequent Co-Authors

Jose G. Guillem
Jose G. Guillem University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bruce D. Minsky
Bruce D. Minsky The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Philip B. Paty
Philip B. Paty Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Leonard Saltz
Leonard Saltz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Nancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
W. Douglas Wong
W. Douglas Wong Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Yuman Fong
Yuman Fong City Of Hope National Medical Center
David P. Kelsen
David P. Kelsen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David S. Klimstra
David S. Klimstra Yale University
Louis B. Harrison
Louis B. Harrison Moffitt Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending medical school. There are several accredited online degree programs that can open doors to rewarding roles in healthcare. For those interested in leadership, a healthcare administration degree online accredited can qualify you for management positions in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses looking to advance may consider bridge programs, such as adn to np pathways. These flexible options help nurses become Nurse Practitioners while balancing work and study. If you’re passionate about wellness and nutrition, the best online nutrition degree programs offer training for careers in dietetics, public health, and wellness coaching.

For professionals seeking upper-level administration roles, consider enrolling in cahme accredited mha online programs. These programs cover essential healthcare management skills and are recognized for their high educational standards. Exploring these online pathways can expand your options in the dynamic and growing healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Alfred M. Cohen

Recently Published Articles