World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
46197
World Ranking
7562
National Ranking
3942

Martin R. Weiser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Weiser sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 466 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin R. Weiser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Weiser sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin R. Weiser is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on oncology and related subfields.

Their work has contributed notably to subfields including oncology, surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The main topics explored in their research cover colorectal cancer surgical treatments, colorectal and anal carcinomas, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer screening and detection, gastric cancer management and outcomes, colorectal cancer treatments and studies, as well as radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Martin R. Weiser has published extensively in several leading scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Cancer Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin R. Weiser include:

  • Julio García-Aguilar
  • J. Joshua Smith
  • Philip B. Paty
  • Emmanouil P. Pappou
  • Garrett M. Nash

The following are some of the recent publications involving or related to their field, listing full titles, publication years, and venues:

  • PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair-Deficient, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Extracellular Vesicle and Particle Biomarkers Define Multiple Human Cancers, 2020, Cell
  • Organ Preservation in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Preoperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colon Cancer, 2021, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer

    Donna M. Muzny;Matthew N. Bainbridge;Kyle Chang;Huyen H. Dinh

  • Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer

    Sandra Misale;Rona Yaeger;Sebastijan Hobor;Elisa Scala

  • Extracellular Vesicle and Particle Biomarkers Define Multiple Human Cancers

    Ayuko Hoshino;Ayuko Hoshino;Han Sang Kim;Han Sang Kim;Linda Bojmar;Linda Bojmar;Linda Bojmar;Kofi Ennu Gyan

  • AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer.

    Martin R. Weiser

  • Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With the Presence of Lynch Syndrome Pan-Cancer

    Alicia Latham;Preethi Srinivasan;Yelena Kemel;Jinru Shia

  • Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

    Andrea Cercek;Campbell S.D. Roxburgh;Campbell S.D. Roxburgh;Paul Strombom;J. Joshua Smith

  • Outcome of Primary Tumor in Patients With Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Receiving Combination Chemotherapy Without Surgery As Initial Treatment

    George A. Poultsides;Elliot L. Servais;Leonard B. Saltz;Sujata Patil

  • Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer.

    Jose G. Guillem;David B. Chessin;Alfred M. Cohen;Jinru Shia

  • Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Routine Use of Radiation Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Trial

    Deborah Schrag;Martin R. Weiser;Karyn A. Goodman;Mithat Gon̈en

  • Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy

    J. Joshua Smith;Paul Strombom;Oliver S. Chow;Campbell S. Roxburgh;Campbell S. Roxburgh

  • Reperfusion injury of ischemic skeletal muscle is mediated by natural antibody and complement.

    M R Weiser;J P Williams;F D Moore;L Kobzik

  • Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy.

    James D. Smith;Jeannine A. Ruby;Karyn A. Goodman;Leonard B. Saltz

  • A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation.

    Karuna Ganesh;Chao Wu;Kevin P. O’Rourke;Bryan C. Szeglin

  • Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management

    J. Joshua Smith;Oliver S. Chow;Marc J. Gollub;Garrett M. Nash

  • Comparative sequencing analysis reveals high genomic concordance between matched primary and metastatic colorectal cancer lesions

    A Rose Brannon;Efsevia Vakiani;Brooke E Sylvester;Sasinya N Scott

  • Pathologic classification and clinical behavior of the spectrum of goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix.

    Laura H Tang;Jinru Shia;Robert A Soslow;Deepti Dhall

  • Rate of pathologic complete response with increased interval between preoperative combined modality therapy and rectal cancer resection.

    Harvey G. Moore;Alicia E. Gittleman;Bruce D. Minsky;Douglas Wong

  • T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery?

    David J. Bentrem;Satoshi Okabe;W. Douglas Wong;Jose G. Guillem

  • The Development of a Validated Instrument to Evaluate Bowel Function After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer

    Larissa K. Temple;Jennifer Bacik;Salvatore G. Savatta;Lester Gottesman

  • Individualized Prediction of Colon Cancer Recurrence Using a Nomogram

    Martin R. Weiser;Ron G. Landmann;Michael W. Kattan;Mithat Gonen

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip B. Paty
Philip B. Paty Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jose G. Guillem
Jose G. Guillem University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jinru Shia
Jinru Shia Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Julio Garcia-Aguilar Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Leonard Saltz
Leonard Saltz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
W. Douglas Wong
W. Douglas Wong Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
J. Joshua Smith
J. Joshua Smith Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Deborah Schrag
Deborah Schrag Harvard University
Bruce D. Minsky
Bruce D. Minsky The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education doesn’t have to mean following a traditional, lengthy, and expensive route. There are affordable and flexible pathways that cater to a variety of backgrounds, especially in nursing and allied health fields. Students looking to advance quickly may consider the online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses, which are designed for those without a nursing degree but who are seeking a rapid transition into advanced practice nursing.

For individuals already holding an RN license, pursuing the cheapest online rn to bsn programs or the cheapest online dnp programs can lead to higher qualifications at a lower cost. These programs offer flexible study, allowing nurses to balance education with professional commitments.

If you are just starting out, identifying the easiest nursing schools to get into can help you begin your journey with fewer admissions barriers. Each of these alternative pathways plays a significant role in meeting the ongoing demand for healthcare professionals in the US, while making education more accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Martin R. Weiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles