World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
32976
World Ranking
10074
National Ranking
972

Gina Brown publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Brown sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 436 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gina Brown D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Brown sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gina Brown is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom, contributing extensively to the field of Medicine with a focus on Oncology, Surgery, and Radiology. Their research spans a broad range of topics related to colorectal and anal carcinomas, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, and radiomics applied to medical imaging.

The primary areas of study where Brown has made significant contributions include:

  • Oncology
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Hepatology

Major research topics covered in Brown's work involve:

  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Brown's frequent co-authors include:

  • Amy Lord
  • Brendan Moran
  • Nicholas P. West
  • Shahnawaz Rasheed
  • Irıs D. Nagtegaal

They have published multiple papers in prominent venues with repeated appearances in

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgery
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Cancer Treatment Reviews
  • Endoscopy

Selected recent papers by Gina Brown include:

  • Anal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • MRI-Diagnosed Tumor Deposits and EMVI Status Have Superior Prognostic Accuracy to Current Clinical TNM Staging in Rectal Cancer, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Radical surgery versus organ preservation via short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early-stage rectal cancer (TREC): a randomised, open-label feasibility study, 2020, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
  • The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation, 2022, Surgical Oncology
  • Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline, 2024, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.

    Gina Brown;Catherine J Richards;Michael W Bourne;Robert G Newcombe

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study

    G Brown;I. R Daniels;R. J Heald;P Quirke

  • Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging

    Gina Brown;A. G. Radcliffe;R. G. Newcombe;N. S. Dallimore

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Detected Tumor Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Predicts Survival Outcomes: MERCURY Experience

    Uday B. Patel;Fiona Taylor;Lennart Blomqvist;Christopher George

  • Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Circumferential Resection Margin Predicts Disease-Free Survival and Local Recurrence: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of the MERCURY Study

    Fiona G.M. Taylor;Philip Quirke;Richard J. Heald;Brendan J. Moran

  • Rectal Carcinoma: Thin-Section MR Imaging for Staging in 28 Patients

    Gina Brown;Catherine J. Richards;Robert G. Newcombe;Nicholas S. Dallimore

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T-category, Lymph Node Metastases, and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    E Al-Sukhni;L Milot;L Milot;M Fruitman;J Beyene

  • Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation

    Andrzej Dzik-Jurasz;Claudia Domenig;Mark George;Jan Wolber

  • Neoadjuvant Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Followed by Synchronous Chemoradiation and Total Mesorectal Excision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Defined Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer

    Ian Chau;Gina Brown;David Cunningham;Diana Tait

  • Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study.

    Fiona G.M Taylor;Philip Quirke;Richard J Heald;Brendan Moran

  • Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: Results of the MERCURY Study

    J. M Fowler;C. E Beagley;L Blomqvist;G Brown

  • EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum

    Cornelis J.H. Van De Velde;Petra G. Boelens;Josep M. Borras;Jan Willem Coebergh

  • Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial

    D. A. Agbamu;N. Day;C. J. Walsh;C. W. Hendrickse

  • Multicenter Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Preoperative Radiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision in Patients With High-Risk Rectal Cancer (EXPERT-C)

    Alice Dewdney;David Cunningham;Josep Tabernero;Jaume Capdevila

  • Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging‐detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer

    N J Smith;Y Barbachano;A R Norman;R I Swift

  • Vessel co-option mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in liver metastases

    Sophia Frentzas;Sophia Frentzas;Eve Simoneau;Victoria L. Bridgeman;Peter B. Vermeulen

  • Corrections to “Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”

    R. Glynne-Jones;L. Wyrwicz;E. Tiret;G. Brown

  • Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial

    Yu Jo Chua;Yu Jo Chua;Yolanda Barbachano;David Cunningham;Jacqui R Oates

  • MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?

    S Burton;G Brown;I R Daniels;A R Norman

Frequent Co-Authors

Paris P. Tekkis
Paris P. Tekkis Imperial College London
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Ian Chau
Ian Chau Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Philip Quirke
Philip Quirke University of Leeds
Andrew Wotherspoon
Andrew Wotherspoon Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Brendan J. Moran
Brendan J. Moran University of New South Wales
Bengt Glimelius
Bengt Glimelius Uppsala University
A. R. Norman
A. R. Norman Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Andrés Cervantes
Andrés Cervantes University of Valencia
Iris D. Nagtegaal
Iris D. Nagtegaal Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While pursuing Medicine in the USA is a rewarding path, there are many other online healthcare degrees that can open doors to thriving careers. For those interested in healthcare leadership, obtaining a degree from one of the best online mha programs can lead to high-level management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Affordability is an important factor for many students. Exploring the cheapest master's in healthcare administration options makes it possible to advance your education without taking on excessive debt.

Nursing professionals aiming for advanced practice roles can benefit from enrolling in one of the best online bsn to dnp programs, which are designed for registered nurses seeking a doctorate of nursing practice.

Those interested in the field of pharmacy can begin their journey by attending online pharmacy schools, providing flexibility while preparing for a licensed pharmacy career.

Exploring these online degrees provides flexible, affordable options and expands your potential career pathways in healthcare beyond a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Gina Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles