World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Iris D. Nagtegaal

Iris D. Nagtegaal

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 102 7511 7058 291 284 565 56887

Iris D. Nagtegaal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iris D. Nagtegaal between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iris D. Nagtegaal published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 26.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 120 publications in 2023. 70 of the 746 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 120. Peak 120 publications in 2023. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 43 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 49 publications 2020: 50 publications 2021: 73 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 120 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 29 publications
1998 2025

746 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iris D. Nagtegaal: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 5
2002 5
2003 3
2004 3
2005 4
2006 4
2007 13
2008 8
2009 14
2010 18
2011 17
2012 25
2013 28
2014 43
2015 42
2016 27
2017 33
2018 26
2019 49
2020 50
2021 73
2022 62
2023 120
2024 41
2025 29
Total 746
Download as CSV

Iris D. Nagtegaal publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris D. Nagtegaal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 565 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 565
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Iris D. Nagtegaal D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris D. Nagtegaal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 102
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Iris D. Nagtegaal is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has an extensive record of research primarily in the field of medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including oncology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The focus of Nagtegaal's research covers a range of topics centered on colorectal and gastric cancers. Key areas of study include colorectal cancer screening and detection, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer management and outcomes, colorectal cancer treatments and studies, colorectal and anal carcinomas, and the application of radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Nagtegaal has contributed to numerous publications in well-known academic journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Histopathology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  • Endoscopy
  • Modern Pathology

Their recent papers include:

  • Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (2020), The Lancet Oncology
  • Fewer cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands (2020), The Lancet Oncology
  • Tumour budding in solid cancers (2020), Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • Multicenter International Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Study of the Consensus Immunoscore for the Prediction of Survival and Response to Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer (2020), Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The impact of the temporary suspension of national cancer screening programmes due to the COVID-19 epidemic on the diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancer in the Netherlands (2020), Journal of Hematology & Oncology

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Nagtegaal's common co-authors include:

  • Monique E. van Leerdam
  • Rachel S. van der Post
  • Evelien Dekker
  • Alessandro Lugli
  • Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

In recognition of their work, Nagtegaal was named a Member of Academia Europaea in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer

    Ellen Kapiteijn;Corrie A.M. Marijnen;Iris D. Nagtegaal;Hein Putter

  • The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.

    Iris D Nagtegaal;Robert D Odze;David Klimstra;Valerie Paradis

  • International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study

    Franck Pagès;Bernhard Mlecnik;Florence Marliot;Gabriela Bindea;Gabriela Bindea;Gabriela Bindea

  • Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial

    Willem van Gijn;Carrie A. M. Marijnen;Iris D. Nagtegaal;Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg

  • ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making

    H J Schmoll;E Van Cutsem;A Stein;V Valentini

  • Towards the introduction of the 'Immunoscore' in the classification of malignant tumours.

    Jérôme Galon;Jérôme Galon;Jérôme Galon;Bernhard Mlecnik;Bernhard Mlecnik;Bernhard Mlecnik;Gabriela Bindea;Gabriela Bindea;Gabriela Bindea;Helen K. Angell;Helen K. Angell;Helen K. Angell

  • The TME Trial After a Median Follow-Up of 6 Years: Increased Local Control but No Survival Benefit in Irradiated Patients With Resectable Rectal Carcinoma

    Koen C. M. J. Peeters;Corrie A. M. Marijnen;Iris D. Nagtegaal;Elma Klein Kranenbarg

  • What Is the Role for the Circumferential Margin in the Modern Treatment of Rectal Cancer

    Iris D. Nagtegaal;Phil Quirke

  • Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis

    Geert Litjens;Clara I. Sánchez;Nadya Timofeeva;Meyke Hermsen

  • Macroscopic Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Resection Specimen: Clinical Significance of the Pathologist in Quality Control

    Iris D. Nagtegaal;Cornelis J.H. van de Velde;Erik van der Worp;Ellen Kapiteijn

  • Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.

    Iris D. Nagtegaal;Corrie A. M. Marijnen;Elma Klein Kranenbarg;Cornelis J. H. Van De Velde

  • Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force

    Jérôme Galon;Franck Pagès;Francesco M Marincola;Francesco M Marincola;Helen K Angell;Helen K Angell

  • Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.

    Alessandro Lugli;Richard Kirsch;Yoichi Ajioka;Fred Bosman

  • Low Rectal Cancer: A Call for a Change of Approach in Abdominoperineal Resection

    Iris D. Nagtegaal;Cornelius J.H. van de Velde;Corrie A.M. Marijnen;Jan H.J.M. van Krieken

  • Mismatch Repair Status and BRAF Mutation Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Pooled Analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS Studies

    Sabine Venderbosch;Iris D Nagtegaal;Timothy S Maughan;Christopher G Smith

  • BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer.

    Jolien Tol;Iris D Nagtegaal;Cornelis J A Punt

  • Fewer cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands.

    Avinash G Dinmohamed;Avinash G Dinmohamed;Otto Visser;Rob H A Verhoeven;Marieke W J Louwman

  • EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum

    Cornelis J.H. Van De Velde;Petra G. Boelens;Josep M. Borras;Jan Willem Coebergh

  • DUTCH COLORECTAL CANCER GROUP. PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY COMBINED WITH TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RESECTABLE RECTAL CANCER

    E Kapiteijn;C A Marijnen;I D Nagtegaal;H Putter

Frequent Co-Authors

Corrie A.M. Marijnen
Corrie A.M. Marijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Cornelis J. A. Punt
Cornelis J. A. Punt University of Amsterdam
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde Leiden University Medical Center
Alessandro Lugli
Alessandro Lugli University of Bern
Pieter J. Tanis
Pieter J. Tanis University of Amsterdam
Bauke Ylstra
Bauke Ylstra Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Nicoline Hoogerbrugge Radboud University
Philip Quirke
Philip Quirke University of Leeds
Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
Regina G. H. Beets-Tan Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA doesn’t only mean becoming a doctor—there are many online degree paths and related careers that can help you join the healthcare field quickly and affordably. For registered nurses seeking advancement, you can find some of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs, allowing you to complete your BSN degree on a budget while balancing work and study.

If you’re a non-nursing graduate considering a fast track to advanced practice, direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online could be a direct route to a rewarding career. There are also easy nursing programs to get into for those just starting out, offering more flexible admissions.

For those interested in healthcare administration or behind-the-scenes work, consider medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid opportunities. These alternative pathways can lead to stable, in-demand roles within the medical sector, and most programs offer flexible online study options.

Best Scientists Citing Iris D. Nagtegaal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles