World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 111 5396 5065 528 504 516 36747

Paris P. Tekkis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paris P. Tekkis between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paris P. Tekkis published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 20.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2008. 13 of the 544 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 68. Peak 68 publications in 2008. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 46 publications 2008: 68 publications 2009: 59 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1999 2025

544 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paris P. Tekkis: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 6
2004 7
2005 20
2006 36
2007 46
2008 68
2009 59
2010 30
2011 32
2012 22
2013 17
2014 12
2015 8
2016 18
2017 31
2018 25
2019 24
2020 18
2021 24
2022 12
2023 4
2024 9
2025 4
Total 544
Download as CSV

Paris P. Tekkis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paris P. Tekkis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 516 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 516
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paris P. Tekkis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paris P. Tekkis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 111
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paris P. Tekkis is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on oncology and surgery. Their research covers a wide array of subfields including epidemiology, gastroenterology, and genetics.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics:

  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes

They have published research papers in prominent journals, with frequent contributions to the following publication venues:

  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Cancers
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Updates in Surgery
  • BJS Open

Recent significant papers by Paris P. Tekkis include:

  • Evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review (2020), International Journal of Colorectal Disease
  • The sigmoid take-off: An anatomical imaging definition of the rectum validated on specimen analysis (2020), European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Postoperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resected high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020), Colorectal Disease
  • Local Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results From the International TaTME Registry (2021), Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Quality of treatment and surgical approach for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a large European cohort (2020), European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Christos Kontovounisios
  • Shahnawaz Rasheed
  • Gianluca Pellino
  • Sarah Mills
  • Oliver Warren

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients.

    Myrddin Rees;Paris P Tekkis;Fenella K S Welsh;Thomas O'Rourke

  • Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Right-Sided and Left-Sided Resections

    Paris P. Tekkis;Antony J. Senagore;Conor Patrick Delaney;Victor W. Fazio

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Detected Tumor Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Predicts Survival Outcomes: MERCURY Experience

    Uday B. Patel;Fiona Taylor;Lennart Blomqvist;Christopher George

  • Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Circumferential Resection Margin Predicts Disease-Free Survival and Local Recurrence: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of the MERCURY Study

    Fiona G.M. Taylor;Philip Quirke;Richard J. Heald;Brendan J. Moran

  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

    Omer Aziz;Vasilis Constantinides;Paris P. Tekkis;Thanos Athanasiou

  • Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study.

    Fiona G.M Taylor;Philip Quirke;Richard J Heald;Brendan Moran

  • A Meta-analysis on the Influence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Pregnancy

    Julie A Cornish;Emile Kw Tan;Julian Teare;Teoh G Teoh

  • Diagnostic precision of fecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy.

    Alexander C von Roon;Leonidas Karamountzos;Sanjay Purkayastha;George E Reese

  • Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial

    D. A. Agbamu;N. Day;C. J. Walsh;C. W. Hendrickse

  • Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM)

    P P Tekkis;D R Prytherch;H M Kocher;A Senapati

  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Children: A Meta-Analysis

    Omer Aziz;Thanos Athanasiou;Paris P. Tekkis;Sanjay Purkayastha

  • A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon)

    Constantinos Simillis;Panayiotis Symeonides;Andrew J. Shorthouse;Paris P. Tekkis

  • Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms--a meta-analysis.

    Constantinos Simillis;Vasilis A. Constantinides;Paris P. Tekkis;Ara Darzi

  • Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: International Registry Results of the First 720 Cases.

    Marta Penna;Roel Hompes;Steve Arnold;Greg Wynn

  • A Comparison of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Following Proctocolectomy: A Meta-Analysis of 4183 Patients

    Richard E. Lovegrove;Vasilis A. Constantinides;Alexander G. Heriot;Thanos Athanasiou

  • Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study.

    Peter McCulloch;Jeremy Ward;Paris P Tekkis

  • Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update

    Nikolaos Gouvas;Nikolaos Gouvas;Emile Tan;Alistair Windsor;Evaghelos Xynos

  • The risk of cancer in patients with Crohn's disease.

    Alexander C. von Roon;George Reese;Julian Teare;Vasilis Constantinides

  • The risk of oral contraceptives in the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

    Julie A Cornish;Emile Tan;Constantinos Simillis;Susan K Clark

  • Comparison of colonic stenting and open surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction

    H. S. Tilney;R. E. Lovegrove;S. Purkayastha;P. S. Sains

Frequent Co-Authors

Gina Brown
Gina Brown Imperial College London
Ara Darzi
Ara Darzi Imperial College London
Robert D. Goldin
Robert D. Goldin Imperial College London
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Thanos Athanasiou
Thanos Athanasiou Imperial College London
Ian Chau
Ian Chau Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Andrew Wotherspoon
Andrew Wotherspoon Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Brendan J. Moran
Brendan J. Moran University of New South Wales
Mark Bower
Mark Bower Imperial College London
Alistair McGuire
Alistair McGuire London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The medical field offers diverse online degrees and certifications that can complement or provide alternatives to a traditional MD. For instance, pursuing an online pharmacist degree can open doors to pharmaceutical careers, combining clinical knowledge with medication management expertise.

If you're interested in the administrative or information-management side of healthcare, consider a online mhi program. These programs focus on health data, records management, and digital systems—essential for today’s tech-driven healthcare environment.

Another growing field is medical billing and coding. Earning a medical coding certification online lets you quickly gain the skills needed for roles that ensure healthcare facilities are properly reimbursed and meet regulatory standards.

For those seeking advanced clinical responsibilities, online nurse practitioner programs allow registered nurses to step into provider roles with increased autonomy and impact.

Exploring these online pathways can provide more flexibility and a range of fulfilling career opportunities within the extensive field of medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Paris P. Tekkis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles