World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Conor P. Delaney

Conor P. Delaney

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
24743
World Ranking
12829
National Ranking
6559

Conor P. Delaney publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conor P. Delaney sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 435 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Conor P. Delaney D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conor P. Delaney sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Conor P. Delaney is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and specializes primarily in medicine with a focus on surgical disciplines. Their research portfolio includes extensive work in surgery, oncology, artificial intelligence, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and neurology.

The scientist's primary fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within this broad category, Conor P. Delaney's subfields of interest encompass:

  • Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Neurology

The main research topics addressed by their work are:

  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Conor P. Delaney has contributed to a variety of scientific publications across several prominent journals and venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Surgical Endoscopy
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • The American Journal of Surgery
  • BJS Open
  • British journal of surgery

The following recent papers highlight some of their research contributions with relevant details:

  • Attenuated CSF-1R signalling drives cerebrovascular pathology, 2020, EMBO Molecular Medicine

While not directly attributed to Delaney as first author, related notable papers in the research environment where Delaney is active include:

  • COVID-19 Outbreak and Surgical Practice, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer, 2020, npj Quantum Information
  • A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor, 2023, Physical Review X
  • Microvascular stabilization via blood-brain barrier regulation prevents seizure activity, 2022, Nature Communications

Frequent collaborators working alongside Conor P. Delaney include:

  • Emre Görgün
  • Scott R. Steele
  • Matthew Campbell
  • David Liska
  • Natalie Hudson

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Right-Sided and Left-Sided Resections

    Paris P. Tekkis;Antony J. Senagore;Conor Patrick Delaney;Victor W. Fazio

  • Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;Massarat Zutshi;Anthony J. Senagore;Feza H. Remzi

  • Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

    Jonah J. Stulberg;Conor Patrick Delaney;Duncan V. Neuhauser;David C Aron;David C Aron

  • Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery

    Michel Adamina;Henrik Kehlet;George A. Tomlinson;Anthony J. Senagore

  • ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co‐morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery

    Conor Patrick Delaney;V. W. Fazio;A. J. Senagore;B. Robinson

  • COVID-19 Outbreak and Surgical Practice: Unexpected Fatality in Perioperative Period.

    Ali Aminian;Saeed Safari;Abdolali Razeghian-Jahromi;Mohammad Ghorbani

  • Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;A. Craig Lynch;Anthony J. Senagore;Victor W. Fazio

  • Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection?: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy

    Hans Joachim Duepree;Anthony J. Senagore;Conor Patrick Delaney;Victor W. Fazio

  • Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;Eunice Chang;Anthony J. Senagore;Michael Broder

  • Prospective, Age-Related Analysis of Surgical Results, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

    Conor P. Delaney;Victor W. Fazio;Feza H. Remzi;Jeff Hammel

  • Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;Ravi P. Kiran;Anthony J. Senagore;Karen Brady

  • Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery.

    Victor W. Fazio;Paris P. Tekkis;Feza Remzi;Ian C. Lavery

  • Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years.

    Feza H. Remzi;Victor W. Fazio;Conor Patrick Delaney;Miriam Preen

  • Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

    Anthony J. Senagore;Hans J. Duepree;Conor Patrick Delaney;Sharmilla Dissanaike

  • Clinical outcome and factors predictive of recurrence after enterocutaneous fistula surgery.

    A. Craig Lynch;Conor P. Delaney;Anthony J. Senagore;Jason T. Connor

  • Phase III Trial of Alvimopan, a Novel, Peripherally Acting, Mu Opioid Antagonist, for Postoperative Ileus After Major Abdominal Surgery

    Conor Patrick Delaney;James L. Weese;Neil H. Hyman;Joel Bauer

  • Variable chimerism, graft-versus-host disease, and tolerance after different kinds of cell and whole organ transplantation from Lewis to brown Norway rats.

    Noriko Murase;Thomas E. Starzl;Minoru Tanabe;Shigeru Fujisaki

  • Risk Factors for Diseases of Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis After Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis

    Bo Shen;Victor W. Fazio;Feza H. Remzi;Aaron Brzezinski

  • Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison.

    Bradley J. Champagne;Harry T. Papaconstantinou;Stavan S. Parmar;Deborah A. Nagle

  • Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients

    P. P. Tekkis;A. J. Senagore;C. P. Delaney

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor W. Fazio
Victor W. Fazio Cleveland Clinic
Anthony J. Senagore
Anthony J. Senagore Central Michigan University
Feza H. Remzi
Feza H. Remzi New York University Langone Medical Center
James M. Church
James M. Church Columbia University
Ian C. Lavery
Ian C. Lavery Cleveland Clinic
Anthony J. Demetris
Anthony J. Demetris University of Pittsburgh
Bo Shen
Bo Shen Columbia University
Noriko Murase
Noriko Murase University of Pittsburgh
Thomas E. Starzl
Thomas E. Starzl University of Pittsburgh
Bruce G. Wolff
Bruce G. Wolff Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Medicine but seeking alternative or faster ways into a healthcare career, there are several flexible options available. For those without a nursing background, cheapest direct entry msn programs offer an accelerated route to a Master’s degree in Nursing, making it possible to qualify for advanced practice roles quicker and at a lower cost.

Students concerned about admission barriers may want to explore the easiest nursing programs to get into, which often provide more accessible entry standards without compromising education quality. For those who wish to avoid standardized test requirements, some nursing schools that don't require teas exams offer alternative admission pathways.

If you’re interested in non-clinical roles, studying medical records and administration can be an excellent option. Numerous medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid allow students to start a rewarding healthcare career with more flexible online study and lower upfront costs.

Best Scientists Citing Conor P. Delaney

Trending Scientists