World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 141 1643 957 658 61051

Victor W. Fazio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Victor W. Fazio between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Victor W. Fazio published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2003. 4 of the 666 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2003. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 15 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 17 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 33 publications 2003: 53 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 29 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1974 2025

666 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Victor W. Fazio: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 3
1976 2
1977 4
1978 7
1979 3
1980 8
1981 7
1982 7
1983 7
1984 7
1985 13
1986 12
1987 15
1988 15
1989 8
1990 11
1991 12
1992 17
1993 21
1994 17
1995 14
1996 18
1997 19
1998 9
1999 9
2000 19
2001 22
2002 33
2003 53
2004 30
2005 36
2006 28
2007 29
2008 33
2009 36
2010 27
2011 26
2012 9
2013 6
2014 3
2015 1
2016 3
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 4
Total 666
Download as CSV

Victor W. Fazio publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor W. Fazio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 641–660 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 658 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371 658
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Victor W. Fazio D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor W. Fazio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 141 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 141
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Victor W. Fazio was a researcher affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their academic contributions spanned multiple fields of study, including Environmental Science, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their research incorporated a range of subfields primarily focused on Ecological Modeling, Genetics, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. These areas reflected an interdisciplinary approach to understanding biological and environmental systems.

The main topics covered in their work included Species Distribution and Climate Change, Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy, and Plant and Animal Studies. These topics indicated a focus on biodiversity, ecological impacts of climate variation, and taxonomy within specific insect groups.

Victor W. Fazio's publications included contributions to the journal bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Notably, one paper titled "Moth species richness in an upland tropical rainforest: A citizen scientist assisted study" was published in 2021 in this venue.

  • Moth species richness in an upland tropical rainforest: A citizen scientist assisted study, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent coauthors of this researcher included:

  • David Y. P. Tng
  • Deborah M. G. Apgaua
  • Nicholas John Fisher

Best Publications

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients

    Victor W. Fazio;Yehiel Ziv;James M. Church;John R. Oakley

  • Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane : a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study

    Becker Jm;Dayton Mt;Fazio Vw;Beck De

  • A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report

    Jeffrey W Milsom;Bartholomäus Böhm;Bartholomäus Böhm;Katherine A Hammerhofer;Victor Fazio

  • Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Right-Sided and Left-Sided Resections

    Paris P. Tekkis;Antony J. Senagore;Conor Patrick Delaney;Victor W. Fazio

  • AGA technical review on perianal Crohn's disease.

    William J Sandborn;Victor W Fazio;Brian G Feagan;Stephen B Hanauer

  • Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients

    Andrea Vignali;Victor W Fazio;Ian C Lavery;Jeffrey W Milsom

  • Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;Massarat Zutshi;Anthony J. Senagore;Feza H. Remzi

  • Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients.

    Victor Warren Fazio;Ravi P. Kiran;Feza H. Remzi;John Calvin Coffey;John Calvin Coffey

  • Long-Term Follow-up of Patients With Crohn's Disease Relationship Between the Clinical Pattern and Prognosis

    Richard G. Farmer;Richard G. Farmer;Gregory Whelan;Gregory Whelan;Victor W. Fazio;Victor W. Fazio

  • Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—Supporting documentation

    Douglas W. Wong;Steven D. Wexner;Ann Lowry;Anthony Vernava

  • ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co‐morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery

    Conor Patrick Delaney;V. W. Fazio;A. J. Senagore;B. Robinson

  • Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

    Michael L. Arvanitis;David G. Jagelman;Victor W. Fazio;Ian C. Lavery

  • Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap.

    Toyooki Sonoda;Tracy Hull;Marion R. Piedmonte;Victor W. Fazio

  • Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

    Victor W. Fazio;Micheal G. O’Riordain;Ian C. Lavery;James M. Church

  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease.

    Jeffrey W. Milson;Katherine A. Hammerhofer;Bartholomaus Böhm;Peter Marcello

  • Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn's disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial.

    V W Fazio;F Marchetti;M Church;J R Goldblum

  • Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

    Matthew F. Kalady;Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato;Luca Stocchi;Daniel P. Geisler

  • Reduction in Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction by Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier After Intestinal Resection

    Victor W. Fazio;Zane Cohen;James W. Fleshman;Harry van Goor

  • A Comparison of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Following Proctocolectomy: A Meta-Analysis of 4183 Patients

    Richard E. Lovegrove;Vasilis A. Constantinides;Alexander G. Heriot;Thanos Athanasiou

  • Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;A. Craig Lynch;Anthony J. Senagore;Victor W. Fazio

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian C. Lavery
Ian C. Lavery Cleveland Clinic
Feza H. Remzi
Feza H. Remzi New York University Langone Medical Center
James M. Church
James M. Church Columbia University
Bo Shen
Bo Shen Columbia University
Conor P. Delaney
Conor P. Delaney Cleveland Clinic
Jeffrey W. Milsom
Jeffrey W. Milsom Cornell University
Anthony J. Senagore
Anthony J. Senagore Central Michigan University
John R. Goldblum
John R. Goldblum Cleveland Clinic
Rocio Lopez
Rocio Lopez Cleveland Clinic
Charles L. Bevins
Charles L. Bevins University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, there are many alternative healthcare career options and pathways that can be pursued online. These roles are essential to the healthcare system and often provide greater flexibility and affordability compared to traditional medical degrees.

Online schools for health information management offer programs that teach valuable skills in managing patient data and healthcare systems. If you’re interested in administrative roles within healthcare, this field can be an excellent choice.

Medical billing and coding is another fast-growing area. Many students ask how much is medical billing and coding school? Fortunately, there are affordable options that can lead to stable career opportunities in clinics, hospitals, and insurance companies.

For those aiming to provide direct patient care, affordable online fnp programs can prepare you to become a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP), a highly respected and in-demand role. There are also affordable online nursing programs that train future registered nurses, offering flexibility for working professionals or those needing remote options.

Each of these pathways offers a unique and rewarding way to contribute to the healthcare field and are worth considering for anyone exploring related medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Victor W. Fazio

Recently Published Articles