World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
141
Citations
61051
World Ranking
1643
National Ranking
958

Victor W. Fazio publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor W. Fazio sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 658 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Victor W. Fazio D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor W. Fazio sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 141 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Victor W. Fazio was a researcher affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their academic contributions spanned multiple fields of study, including Environmental Science, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their research incorporated a range of subfields primarily focused on Ecological Modeling, Genetics, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. These areas reflected an interdisciplinary approach to understanding biological and environmental systems.

The main topics covered in their work included Species Distribution and Climate Change, Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy, and Plant and Animal Studies. These topics indicated a focus on biodiversity, ecological impacts of climate variation, and taxonomy within specific insect groups.

Victor W. Fazio's publications included contributions to the journal bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Notably, one paper titled "Moth species richness in an upland tropical rainforest: A citizen scientist assisted study" was published in 2021 in this venue.

  • Moth species richness in an upland tropical rainforest: A citizen scientist assisted study, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent coauthors of this researcher included:

  • David Y. P. Tng
  • Deborah M. G. Apgaua
  • Nicholas John Fisher

Best Publications

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients

    Victor W. Fazio;Yehiel Ziv;James M. Church;John R. Oakley

  • Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane : a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study

    Becker Jm;Dayton Mt;Fazio Vw;Beck De

  • A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report

    Jeffrey W Milsom;Bartholomäus Böhm;Bartholomäus Böhm;Katherine A Hammerhofer;Victor Fazio

  • Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Right-Sided and Left-Sided Resections

    Paris P. Tekkis;Antony J. Senagore;Conor Patrick Delaney;Victor W. Fazio

  • AGA technical review on perianal Crohn's disease.

    William J Sandborn;Victor W Fazio;Brian G Feagan;Stephen B Hanauer

  • Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients

    Andrea Vignali;Victor W Fazio;Ian C Lavery;Jeffrey W Milsom

  • Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;Massarat Zutshi;Anthony J. Senagore;Feza H. Remzi

  • Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients.

    Victor Warren Fazio;Ravi P. Kiran;Feza H. Remzi;John Calvin Coffey;John Calvin Coffey

  • Long-Term Follow-up of Patients With Crohn's Disease Relationship Between the Clinical Pattern and Prognosis

    Richard G. Farmer;Richard G. Farmer;Gregory Whelan;Gregory Whelan;Victor W. Fazio;Victor W. Fazio

  • Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—Supporting documentation

    Douglas W. Wong;Steven D. Wexner;Ann Lowry;Anthony Vernava

  • ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co‐morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery

    Conor Patrick Delaney;V. W. Fazio;A. J. Senagore;B. Robinson

  • Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

    Michael L. Arvanitis;David G. Jagelman;Victor W. Fazio;Ian C. Lavery

  • Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap.

    Toyooki Sonoda;Tracy Hull;Marion R. Piedmonte;Victor W. Fazio

  • Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

    Victor W. Fazio;Micheal G. O’Riordain;Ian C. Lavery;James M. Church

  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease.

    Jeffrey W. Milson;Katherine A. Hammerhofer;Bartholomaus Böhm;Peter Marcello

  • Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn's disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial.

    V W Fazio;F Marchetti;M Church;J R Goldblum

  • Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

    Matthew F. Kalady;Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato;Luca Stocchi;Daniel P. Geisler

  • Reduction in Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction by Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier After Intestinal Resection

    Victor W. Fazio;Zane Cohen;James W. Fleshman;Harry van Goor

  • A Comparison of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Following Proctocolectomy: A Meta-Analysis of 4183 Patients

    Richard E. Lovegrove;Vasilis A. Constantinides;Alexander G. Heriot;Thanos Athanasiou

  • Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

    Conor Patrick Delaney;A. Craig Lynch;Anthony J. Senagore;Victor W. Fazio

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian C. Lavery
Ian C. Lavery Cleveland Clinic
Feza H. Remzi
Feza H. Remzi New York University Langone Medical Center
James M. Church
James M. Church Columbia University
Bo Shen
Bo Shen Columbia University
Conor P. Delaney
Conor P. Delaney Cleveland Clinic
Jeffrey W. Milsom
Jeffrey W. Milsom Cornell University
Anthony J. Senagore
Anthony J. Senagore Central Michigan University
John R. Goldblum
John R. Goldblum Cleveland Clinic
Rocio Lopez
Rocio Lopez Cleveland Clinic
Charles L. Bevins
Charles L. Bevins University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, there are many alternative healthcare career options and pathways that can be pursued online. These roles are essential to the healthcare system and often provide greater flexibility and affordability compared to traditional medical degrees.

Online schools for health information management offer programs that teach valuable skills in managing patient data and healthcare systems. If you’re interested in administrative roles within healthcare, this field can be an excellent choice.

Medical billing and coding is another fast-growing area. Many students ask how much is medical billing and coding school? Fortunately, there are affordable options that can lead to stable career opportunities in clinics, hospitals, and insurance companies.

For those aiming to provide direct patient care, affordable online fnp programs can prepare you to become a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP), a highly respected and in-demand role. There are also affordable online nursing programs that train future registered nurses, offering flexibility for working professionals or those needing remote options.

Each of these pathways offers a unique and rewarding way to contribute to the healthcare field and are worth considering for anyone exploring related medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Victor W. Fazio

Recently Published Articles