World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruce G. Wolff

Bruce G. Wolff

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
27342
World Ranking
12287
National Ranking
6293

Bruce G. Wolff publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce G. Wolff sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 268 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bruce G. Wolff D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce G. Wolff sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce G. Wolff is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their recent research contributions include a publication titled "An Eclectic Collection," published in 2020. This paper appeared in the journal Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

Their work has been cited in academic literature, reflecting engagement from the research community. The specific publication has received citations, marking it as a notable entry in their research portfolio.

Their publication record notably includes contributions to the following venue:

  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

The available data does not record frequent co-authors, book publications, distinct main fields, or subfields of study.

This profile captures the documented academic footprint of Bruce G. Wolff based on current records associated with their research outputs and institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit

    Amanda M. Metcalf;Sidney F. Phillips;Alan R. Zinsmeister;Robert L. MacCarty

  • Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

    Steven J. Stryker;Bruce G. Wolff;Clyde E. Culp;Susan D. Libbe

  • Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane : a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study

    Becker Jm;Dayton Mt;Fazio Vw;Beck De

  • A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas

    David A. Schwartz;Maurits J. Wiersema;Kika M. Dudiak;J.G. Fletcher

  • Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950-2002).

    John J. Park;Bruce G. Wolff;Matthew K. Tollefson;Erin E. Walsh

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results.

    John H. Pemberton;Keith A. Kelly;Robert W. Beart;Roger R. Dozois

  • Early postoperative complications are not increased in patients with Crohn's disease treated perioperatively with infliximab or immunosuppressive therapy

    Jean Frédéric Colombel;Edward V Loftus;William J Tremaine;John H Pemberton

  • Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

    D. Hahnloser;J. H. Pemberton;B. G. Wolff;D. R. Larson

  • Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial

    Julio Garcia-Aguilar;Lindsay A Renfro;Oliver S Chow;Qian Shi

  • Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum

    Salman Zaheer;John H. Pemberton;Ridzuan Farouk;Roger R. Dozois

  • Reduction in Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction by Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier After Intestinal Resection

    Victor W. Fazio;Zane Cohen;James W. Fleshman;Harry van Goor

  • A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine.

    David E. Beck;Zane Cohen;James W. Fleshman;Howard S. Kaufman

  • Effect of infliximab on short-term complications in patients undergoing operation for chronic ulcerative colitis.

    Chelliah R. Selvasekar;Robert R. Cima;David W. Larson;Eric J. Dozois

  • Alvimopan, a Novel, Peripherally Acting μ Opioid Antagonist: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Major Abdominal Surgery and Postoperative Ileus

    Bruce G Wolff;Fabrizio Michelassi;Todd M Gerkin;Lee Techner

  • The natural history of surgically treated primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix.

    Samy S. Nitecki;Bruce G. Wolff;Richard Schlinkert;Michael G. Sarr

  • The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function

    C. F. Kollmorgen;A. P. Meagher;B. G. Wolff;J. H. Pemberton

  • Complicated diverticulitis: is it time to rethink the rules?

    Jennifer Chapman;Michael Davies;Bruce Wolff;Eric Dozois

  • Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

    Ridzuan Farouk;John H. Pemberton;Bruce G. Wolff;Roger R. Dozois

  • Recurrence of Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection is not affected by anastomotic type: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

    Robin S. McLeod;Bruce G. Wolff;Sue Ross;Robert Parkes

  • Diverticulitis: a progressive disease? Do multiple recurrences predict less favorable outcomes?

    Jennifer R. Chapman;Eric J. Dozois;Bruce G. Wolff;Rachel E. Gullerud

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger R. Dozois
Roger R. Dozois Mayo Clinic
Duane M. Ilstrup
Duane M. Ilstrup Mayo Clinic
Edward V. Loftus
Edward V. Loftus Mayo Clinic
William J. Sandborn
William J. Sandborn University of California, San Diego
Dirk R. Larson
Dirk R. Larson Mayo Clinic
Heidi Nelson
Heidi Nelson Mayo Clinic
Robert W. Beart
Robert W. Beart University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding healthcare career options beyond the MD track. Many students consider alternative degrees that are accessible and in high demand. For instance, prospective nurses can check out nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi, streamlining the admissions process and allowing for a quicker start in the profession.

Those interested in management roles within healthcare may benefit from accelerated healthcare programs, which can often be completed online and let you earn your degree faster than traditional routes.

For current nurses with an associate degree who are keen to advance, asn to np bridge programs provide an efficient pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner, increasing both responsibility and earning potential.

Additionally, nutrition and wellness are critical to public health. If you have a passion for this area, you might consider pursuing a nutrition degree online to qualify for a wide range of roles in clinical, community, or corporate settings.

With a flexible array of online and accelerated healthcare degrees, you can tailor your studies to meet your interests, budget, and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce G. Wolff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles