World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
5435
World Ranking
6178
National Ranking
488

Ian D. Lunt publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian D. Lunt sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 85 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ian D. Lunt D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian D. Lunt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian D. Lunt is affiliated with Charles Sturt University in Australia. Their academic work spans several areas within their field of study, although specific topics or publication details are not listed in available data.

There are no records of recent papers authored by Ian D. Lunt, nor information on frequent co-authors or publication venues commonly associated with their research output.

The data does not indicate any book publications credited to Ian D. Lunt, and there are no awards recorded for this individual.

Their research interests and specialties, including main fields, subfields, and main topics of work, have not been specified in the provided information.

Based on the available data, Ian D. Lunt maintains an active professional status with no indication of having passed away.

Best Publications

  • Restoring ecological function in temperate grassy woodlands: manipulating soil nutrients, exotic annuals and native perennial grasses through carbon supplements and spring burns

    Suzanne M. Prober;Kevin R. Thiele;Ian D. Lunt;T. B. Koen

  • A framework to predict the effects of livestock grazing and grazing exclusion on conservation values in natural ecosystems in Australia.

    Ian D. Lunt;David J. Eldridge;John W. Morgan;G. Bradd Witt

  • Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes

    Ian D. Lunt;Peter G. Spooner

  • Effects of time-since-fire on the tussock dynamics of a dominant grass (Themeda triandra) in a temperate Australian grassland

    John W Morgan;Ian D Lunt

  • Identifying ecological barriers to restoration in temperate grassy woodlands: soil changes associated with different degradation states

    Suzanne M. Prober;Kevin R. Thiele;Ian D. Lunt

  • Is fencing enough? The short‐term effects of stock exclusion in remnant grassy woodlands in southern NSW

    Peter Spooner;Ian Lunt;Wayne Robinson

  • Determining reference conditions for management and restoration of temperate grassy woodlands: relationships among trees, topsoils and understorey flora in little-grazed remnants.

    Suzanne M. Prober;Ian D. Lunt;Kevin R. Thiele

  • Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity

    Clive McAlpine;Carla P Catterall;Ralph Mac Nally;David Lindenmayer

  • Using assisted colonisation to conserve biodiversity and restore ecosystem function under climate change

    Ian D. Lunt;Margaret Byrne;Jessica J. Hellmann;Nicola J. Mitchell

  • Effects of disturbance on population dynamics of the threatened orchid Prasophyllum correctum D.L. Jones and implications for grassland management in south-eastern Australia

    Fiona Coates;Ian D. Lunt;Raymond L. Tremblay;Raymond L. Tremblay

  • Effects of invasion by the indigenous shrub Acacia sophorae on plant composition of coastal grasslands in south-eastern Australia

    David A Costello;Ian D Lunt;Jann E Williams

  • Ecological processes: A key element in strategies for nature conservation

    Andrew F. Bennett;Angie Haslem;David C. Cheal;Michael F. Clarke

  • The role of fire regimes in temperate lowland grasslands of southeastern Australia.

    I. D. Lunt;J. W. Morgan;R. A. Bradstock;J. E. Williams

  • Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-eastern Australia

    Ian D. Lunt

  • Spatial analysis of roadside Acacia populations on a road network using the network K-function

    Peter G. Spooner;Ian D. Lunt;Atsuyuki Okabe;Shino Shiode

  • Effects of long-term vegetation management on remnant grassy forests and anthropogenic native grasslands in south-eastern Australia

    Ian D. Lunt

  • Restoration of Themeda australis swards suppresses soil nitrate and enhances ecological resistance to invasion by exotic annuals

    Suzanne M. Prober;Ian D. Lunt

  • Effects of grazing exclusion on plant species richness and phytomass accumulation vary across a regional productivity gradient

    Nick L. Schultz;John W. Morgan;Ian D. Lunt

  • Allocasuarina (Casuarinaceae) Invasion of an Unburnt Coastal Woodland at Ocean Grove, Victoria: Structural Changes 1971–1996

    Ian. D. Lunt

  • Two hundred years of land use and vegetation change in a remnant coastal woodland in southern Australia.

    Ian D. Lunt

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzanne M. Prober
Suzanne M. Prober Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
John W. Morgan
John W. Morgan La Trobe University
Ross A. Bradstock
Ross A. Bradstock University of Wollongong
Dave Kendal
Dave Kendal University of Melbourne
David J. Eldridge
David J. Eldridge University of New South Wales
Andrew F. Bennett
Andrew F. Bennett La Trobe University
Matthew J. Colloff
Matthew J. Colloff Australian National University
Richard J. Hobbs
Richard J. Hobbs University of Western Australia
Sue McIntyre
Sue McIntyre Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Damian Michael
Damian Michael Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution builds a solid foundation for a wide range of career pathways, including those in research, education, conservation, and public policy. If you’re seeking to expand your skills or transition into related fields, there are several online degree options that can boost your qualifications.

Many graduates pursue connections between ecology, psychology, and public health. For those interested in the human elements of environmental issues, a 1 year master's in psychology online program can provide a fast and flexible way to gain deeper understanding of human behavior. There are also fast track mental health counseling programs available for those looking to support communities or individuals coping with environmental change.

Some may be drawn to investigative careers; a forensic psychology degree can open doors to roles that require analytic and critical thinking skills often honed through ecology studies. Those passionate about working with youth can consider child psychology masters programs, preparing for jobs in education, counseling, or advocacy.

Exploring interdisciplinary online degrees is a robust way to diversify your skill set and broaden your career opportunities in the ecological and human sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Ian D. Lunt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles