World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
80
Citations
21995
World Ranking
835
National Ranking
69

David A. Keith publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Keith sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 275 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David A. Keith D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Keith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Keith is a researcher affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. The primary area of their work centers on environmental science, with a significant focus on global and planetary change, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, atmospheric science, and ecological modeling. These fields collectively frame the scope of their academic pursuits.

They have contributed extensively to topics including ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, fire effects on ecosystems, species distribution and climate change, rangeland and wildlife management, land use and ecosystem services, rangeland management and livestock ecology, as well as conservation, biodiversity, and resource management.

Their recent scientific output includes publications such as:

  • A function-based typology for Earth's ecosystems, 2022, Nature
  • Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • High fire frequency and the impact of the 2019-2020 megafires on Australian plant diversity, 2021, Diversity and Distributions
  • Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact, 2021, Conservation Biology
  • What Do the Australian Black Summer Fires Signify for the Global Fire Crisis?, 2021, Fire

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David A. Keith include José R. Ferrer-Paris, Emily Nicholson, Richard T. Kingsford, Mark G. Tozer, and Nicholas Murray.

Publication outputs have appeared predominantly in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Conservation Biology, Global Ecology and Biogeography, and Remote Sensing.

David A. Keith has also contributed to edited volumes and book publications with organizations including the University of South Florida and IUCN eBooks. Titles they have contributed to include "TF1.4 Seasonal Floodplain Marshes," "F1.2 Permanent Lowland Rivers," "F1.1 Permanent Upland Streams," "F2.3 Seasonal Freshwater Lakes," and "IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0," all published in 2020.

Best Publications

  • PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS IN RELATION TO FIRE IN CROWN-FIRE ECOSYSTEMS

    Juli G. Pausas;Ross A. Bradstock;David A. Keith;Jon E. Keeley

  • Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models.

    David A Keith;H. Resit Akçakaya;Wilfried Thuiller;Guy F Midgley

  • Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies

    Martine Maron;Richard J. Hobbs;Atte Moilanen;Jeffrey W. Matthews

  • Limits to the use of threatened species lists

    Hugh P Possingham;Sandy J Andelman;Mark A Burgman;Rodrigo A Medellı́n

  • Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems.

    David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Jon Paul Rodríguez;Kathryn M. Rodríguez-Clark;Emily Nicholson

  • Ocean shores to desert dunes : the native vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT

    David Keith

  • Value of long-term ecological studies

    David B. Lindenmayer;Gene E. Likens;Gene E. Likens;Alan Andersen;David Bowman

  • An ecomodernist manifesto

    J Asafu-Adjaye;L Blomquist;S Brand;BW Brook

  • Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them

    Don A. Driscoll;David B. Lindenmayer;Andrew F. Bennett;Michael Bode

  • Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species.

    William Fithian;Jane Elith;Trevor Hastie;David A. Keith

  • Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty

    H. Reşit Akçakaya;Scott Ferson;Mark A. Burgman;David A. Keith

  • A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Satellite remote sensing of ecosystem functions: opportunities, challenges and way forward

    Nathalie Pettorelli;Henrike Schulte to Bühne;Ayesha Tulloch;Grégoire Dubois

  • Uncertainty and adaptive management for biodiversity conservation

    David A. Keith;Tara G. Martin;Eve McDonald-Madden;Carl Walters

  • Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

    Martine Maron;Christopher D. Ives;Christopher D. Ives;Heini Kujala;Joseph W. Bull

  • Fire-driven extinction of plant populations: A synthesis of theory and review of evidence from Australian vegetation

    David Keith

  • A comparison of resampling methods for remote sensing classification and accuracy assessment

    Mitchell B. Lyons;David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Stuart R. Phinn;Tanya J. Mason

  • Plant extinction risk under climate change: are forecast range shifts alone a good indicator of species vulnerability to global warming?

    Damien A. Fordham;H. Resit Akçakaya;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Jane Elith

  • Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species

    H. Resit Akçakaya;H. Resit Akçakaya;Elizabeth L. Bennett;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Molly K. Grace

  • A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis

    Michael Bedward;Robert L. Pressey;David A. Keith

  • Major conservation policy issues for biodiversity in Oceania.

    Richard Kingsford;James Watson;Carolyn Lundquist;Oscar Venter

  • Establishing IUCN Red List Criteria for Threatened Ecosystems

    Jon Paul Rodríguez;Kathryn M. Rodríguez-Clark;Jonathan E. M. Baillie;Neville Ash

  • Guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria. Version 1.1

    L. M. Bland;D.A. Keith;R.M. Miller;N.J. Murray

  • SPECIAL FEATURE PAPER: NEW OPPORTUNITIES AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN ECOLOGY AND STATISTICS Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species

    William Fithian;Jane Elith;Trevor Hastie;David A. Keith

Frequent Co-Authors

Tracey J. Regan
Tracey J. Regan Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research
Emily Nicholson
Emily Nicholson Deakin University
Mark A. Burgman
Mark A. Burgman Imperial College London
David B. Lindenmayer
David B. Lindenmayer Australian National University
Jon Paul Rodríguez
Jon Paul Rodríguez Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas
Helen M. Regan
Helen M. Regan University of California, Riverside
H. Resit Akçakaya
H. Resit Akçakaya Stony Brook University
Tony D. Auld
Tony D. Auld University of New South Wales
Michael A. McCarthy
Michael A. McCarthy University of Melbourne
Richard T. Kingsford
Richard T. Kingsford University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in shifting toward applied fields after studying Ecology and Evolution, online health programs offer flexible and accelerated options. Prospective students from non-traditional backgrounds may consider online BSN programs for non nurses to quickly gain nursing credentials and build on their scientific foundation.

The field also presents diverse career outcomes. Those exploring psychiatric care may look into potential earnings using this resource: psych np salary. Understanding compensation can help inform your career decision-making process.

If you’re curious about advancing your credentials efficiently, you might wonder how long to become nurse practitioner. Accelerated options mean dedicated learners can make the transition in less time than you might expect.

Finally, for existing RNs looking to grow, the shortest rn to bsn program choices can provide a quick pathway to higher qualifications. Such flexibility makes a career change or progression more accessible—even for those with backgrounds in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Keith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles