World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
18803
World Ranking
2636
National Ranking
167

Tara G. Martin publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tara G. Martin sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 149 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tara G. Martin D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tara G. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tara G. Martin is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has a research focus primarily in Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields including Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their research topics cover a range of areas related to environmental and ecological dynamics, including:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • Estuaries and Coasts
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • People and Nature

Tara G. Martin has collaborated repeatedly with several researchers, notably Lia Chalifour, Riley J. R. Finn, Abbey E. Camaclang, Megan S. Adams, and Jesse R. Fleri.

Recent scientific papers by Tara G. Martin include:

  • An introduction to decision science for conservation (2021), published in Conservation Biology
  • MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management Problems (2021), published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Subsidizing extinction? (2020), published in Conservation Letters
  • Prioritizing conservation actions for Pacific salmon in Canada (2020), published in Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Inclusive approaches for cumulative effects assessments (2023), published in People and Nature

Best Publications

  • Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

    A. Guisan;R. Tingley;J. B. Baumgartner;I. Naujokaitis-Lewis

  • The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people

    Brett R. Scheffers;Luc De Meester;Tom C. L. Bridge;Tom C. L. Bridge;Ary A. Hoffmann

  • Assessing species' vulnerability to climate change

    Michela Pacifici;Michela Pacifici;Wendy B. Foden;Wendy B. Foden;Piero Visconti;Piero Visconti;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson

  • Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations

    Tara G. Martin;Brendan A. Wintle;Jonathan R. Rhodes;Petra M. Kuhnert

  • Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science

    Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin;Mark A. Burgman;Fiona Fidler;Petra M. Kuhnert

  • Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Chrystal S. Mantyka-pringle;Chrystal S. Mantyka-pringle;Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin;Jonathan R. Rhodes

  • Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs

    Ayesha I.T. Tulloch;Hugh P. Possingham;Liana N. Joseph;Judit Szabo

  • Conserving mobile species

    Claire A Runge;Tara G Martin;Tara G Martin;Hugh P Possingham;Hugh P Possingham;Stephen G Willis;Stephen G Willis;Stephen G Willis

  • A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in Bayesian ecological models

    Petra M. Kuhnert;Tara G. Martin;Shane P. Griffiths

  • Climate change vulnerability assessment of species

    Wendy B. Foden;Wendy B. Foden;Bruce E. Young;Bruce E. Young;H. Resit Akçakaya;H. Resit Akçakaya;Raquel A. Garcia;Raquel A. Garcia

  • Optimal conservation of migratory species

    Tara G. Martin;Iadine Chadès;Peter Arcese;Peter P. Marra

  • Acting fast helps avoid extinction

    Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin;Simon Nally;Andrew A. Burbidge;Sophie Arnall

  • Monitoring does not always count.

    Eve McDonald-Madden;Eve McDonald-Madden;Peter W.J. Baxter;Peter W.J. Baxter;Richard A. Fuller;Richard A. Fuller;Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin

  • Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change

    Chrystal S. Mantyka-Pringle;Piero Visconti;Piero Visconti;Moreno Di Marco;Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin

  • Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: breeding‐season habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies

    D. T. Tyler Flockhart;Jean-Baptiste Pichancourt;D. Ryan Norris;Tara G. Martin

  • Uncertainty and adaptive management for biodiversity conservation

    David A. Keith;Tara G. Martin;Eve McDonald-Madden;Carl Walters

  • The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds

    Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin;Petra M. Kuhnert;Petra M. Kuhnert;Kerrie L. Mengersen;Hugh P. Possingham

  • General rules for managing and surveying networks of pests, diseases, and endangered species

    Iadine Chadès;Tara G. Martin;Samuel Nicol;Mark A. Burgman

  • Modeling abundance using N-mixture models: the importance of considering ecological mechanisms

    Liana N. Joseph;Ché Elkin;Tara G. Martin;Hugh P. Possingham

  • Understanding and predicting the combined effects of climate change and land-use change on freshwater macroinvertebrates and fish

    Chrystal S. Mantyka-Pringle;Chrystal S. Mantyka-Pringle;Tara G. Martin;Tara G. Martin;David B. Moffatt;Simon Linke

  • The relative importance of cattle grazing in subtropical grasslands: does it reduce or enhance plant biodiversity?

    S. Mcintyre;K. M. Heard;T. G. Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Josie Carwardine
Josie Carwardine Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jennifer Firn
Jennifer Firn Queensland University of Technology
Eve McDonald-Madden
Eve McDonald-Madden University of Queensland
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Richard A. Fuller
Richard A. Fuller University of Queensland
Sue McIntyre
Sue McIntyre Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jonathan R. Rhodes
Jonathan R. Rhodes University of Queensland
Peter Arcese
Peter Arcese University of British Columbia
Joern Fischer
Joern Fischer Leuphana University of Lüneburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in aligning your passion for Ecology and Evolution with a rewarding career? The USA offers flexible online degrees that prepare students for numerous pathways in healthcare, research, and environmental science. If you're seeking a fast route to advance your healthcare qualifications, consider the fastest rn to bsn program online. These accelerated programs help registered nurses earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as little as six months, opening doors to more specialized roles.

For registered nurses aiming to become Family Nurse Practitioners, an adn to fnp bridge program is a practical option. These allow nurses to transition from an Associate Degree in Nursing directly to advanced practice positions. If you don’t possess a nursing background, there are also online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses designed to help science majors and career changers access advanced nursing degrees.

Choosing the right university is crucial for your career pathway. Explore the differences and unique offerings in programs such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn to see which online degree best matches your goals and learning style.

Best Scientists Citing Tara G. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles