World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
92
Citations
40337
World Ranking
409
National Ranking
38

Richard A. Fuller publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Fuller sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 312 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard A. Fuller D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Fuller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity
  • Habitat

His primary scientific interests are in Biodiversity, Ecology, Environmental protection, Environmental resource management and Urbanization. The Biodiversity study combines topics in areas such as Urban density and Agroforestry. His Ecology study incorporates themes from Natural resource economics and Extinction.

His Environmental protection research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Protected area and Occurrence data. His Environmental resource management research integrates issues from Environmental monitoring, Environmental economics and Ecosystem services. His work carried out in the field of Urbanization brings together such families of science as Space, Marketing, Per capita and Urban planning.

His most cited work include:

  • Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis (850 citations)
  • Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity (805 citations)
  • Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers (634 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Richard A. Fuller focuses on Ecology, Biodiversity, Habitat, Threatened species and Environmental resource management. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Extinction and Ecology. Richard A. Fuller has researched Biodiversity in several fields, including Ecosystem services, Environmental planning, Environmental protection, Climate change and Protected area.

His work carried out in the field of Habitat brings together such families of science as Intertidal zone, Vegetation and Predation. The study incorporates disciplines such as Range, IUCN Red List, Endangered species and Introduced species in addition to Threatened species. Richard A. Fuller works mostly in the field of Environmental resource management, limiting it down to topics relating to Ecosystem and, in certain cases, Agroforestry.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (48.20%)
  • Biodiversity (38.13%)
  • Habitat (22.66%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Biodiversity (38.13%)
  • Threatened species (21.58%)
  • Ecology (48.20%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Richard A. Fuller spends much of his time researching Biodiversity, Threatened species, Ecology, Habitat and Habitat destruction. His Biodiversity study combines topics in areas such as Protected area, Environmental resource management and Ecosystem. His Threatened species study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Environmental protection, Ecology, IUCN Red List, Species richness and Statistics.

His Ecology study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Extinction. His study focuses on the intersection of Habitat and fields such as Abundance with connections in the field of Population growth, Tropical ecology, Philopatry and Predation. His Habitat destruction research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Eastern curlew, Fishery, Wetland and Ecosystem services.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Global conservation of species' niches. (22 citations)
  • Estimating the benefit of well-managed protected areas for threatened species conservation (13 citations)
  • Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window (12 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity
  • Habitat

His primary areas of investigation include Threatened species, Biodiversity, Ecology, Range and Social psychology. The Threatened species study combines topics in areas such as Statistics, Species richness and Occupancy. His Species richness research includes themes of Endangered species, Generalist and specialist species and Environmental resource management.

His Biodiversity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Protected area and Ecological niche. His study involves Butterfly and Flyway, a branch of Ecology. Richard A. Fuller has included themes like Urbanization and Extinction in his Social psychology study.

Best Publications

  • Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers

    Sean L. Maxwell;Richard A. Fuller;Thomas M. Brooks;James E. M. Watson

  • Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity

    Richard A Fuller;Katherine N Irvine;Patrick Devine-Wright;Philip H Warren

  • Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis

    Stuart Bearhop;Stuart Bearhop;Colin E. Adams;Susan Waldron;Richard A. Fuller

  • What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature

    Lucy E. Keniger;Kevin J. Gaston;Katherine N. Irvine;Richard A. Fuller

  • The global distribution and trajectory of tidal flats

    Nicholas J. Murray;Nicholas J. Murray;Stuart R. Phinn;Michael F DeWitt;Renata Ferrari

  • One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.

    Kendall R. Jones;Oscar Venter;Richard A. Fuller;James R. Allan

  • Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK

    Olga Barbosa;Jamie A. Tratalos;Paul R. Armsworth;Richard G. Davies

  • Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services

    Jamie Tratalos;Richard A. Fuller;Philip H. Warren;Richard G. Davies

  • Stochastic simulations reveal few green wave surfing populations among spring migrating herbivorous waterfowl.

    Xin Wang;Lei Cao;Anthony D. Fox;Richard Fuller

  • Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.

    Elizabeth H. Boakes;Philip J. K. McGowan;Richard A. Fuller;Richard A. Fuller;Ding Chang-qing

  • Cities are hotspots for threatened species

    Christopher D. Ives;Pia E. Lentini;Caragh G. Threlfall;Karen Ikin

  • The scaling of green space coverage in European cities

    Richard A. Fuller;Kevin J. Gaston

  • Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology

    Kevin J. Gaston;Richard A. Fuller

  • The sizes of species' geographic ranges

    Kevin J. Gaston;Richard A. Fuller

  • Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity.

    Oscar Venter;Richard A. Fuller;Daniel B. Segan;Josie Carwardine

  • Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge–Action Boundary

    Carly N. Cook;Carly N. Cook;Michael B. Mascia;Mark W. Schwartz;Hugh P. Possingham

  • Conserving mobile species

    Claire A Runge;Tara G Martin;Tara G Martin;Hugh P Possingham;Hugh P Possingham;Stephen G Willis;Stephen G Willis;Stephen G Willis

  • Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea

    Nicholas J Murray;Nicholas J Murray;Robert S Clemens;Stuart R Phinn;Hugh P Possingham;Hugh P Possingham

  • Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites

    Colin E. Studds;Bruce E. Kendall;Nicholas J. Murray;Nicholas J. Murray;Howard B. Wilson

  • A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens

    Zoe G. Davies;Richard A. Fuller;Alison Loram;Katherine N. Irvine

  • Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets

    Stuart H.M. Butchart;Martin Clarke;Robert J. Smith;Rachel E. Sykes

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Brenda B. Lin
Brenda B. Lin Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Oscar Venter
Oscar Venter University of Northern British Columbia
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch University of Sydney
Tara G. Martin
Tara G. Martin University of British Columbia
Eve McDonald-Madden
Eve McDonald-Madden University of Queensland
Josie Carwardine
Josie Carwardine Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Philip H. Warren
Philip H. Warren University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens up numerous interdisciplinary career opportunities, both in science and in fields that support healthcare and the environment. Many students interested in life sciences later explore healthcare as a practical application of their knowledge. For those with a background in nursing, specialized online pathways like rn to np programs allow registered nurses to become nurse practitioners and impact public health.

Even non-nurses can enter healthcare rapidly with options such as online direct entry msn programs, designed for those holding bachelor's degrees in non-nursing fields. Choosing the right online school is also crucial; current and prospective students often compare curriculums and flexibility as seen in the debate over capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn to find the most suitable fit and value.

For professionals aiming to advance further, bridging from a BSN to an MSN online can be both affordable and convenient. Programs like these, as highlighted in bsn to msn online programs, help professionals elevate their expertise and future career prospects in both healthcare and allied scientific fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Fuller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles