World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Milica Radisic

Milica Radisic

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 80 532 505 21 20 270 24406
Biology and Biochemistry 80 4051 3735 132 121 288 24641

Milica Radisic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Milica Radisic between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Milica Radisic published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2024. 12 of the 330 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2024. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 2 publications
2002 2026

330 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Milica Radisic: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 6
2005 6
2006 11
2007 12
2008 9
2009 10
2010 10
2011 15
2012 21
2013 18
2014 17
2015 11
2016 15
2017 17
2018 16
2019 16
2020 22
2021 20
2022 16
2023 21
2024 27
2025 10
2026 2
Total 330
Download as CSV

Milica Radisic publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milica Radisic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 268–277 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 270 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214 270
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Milica Radisic D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milica Radisic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39 80
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering

Overview

Milica Radisic is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research spans the intersection of medicine and engineering, with a primary focus on biomedical engineering and molecular biology. The scientist's work also covers subfields such as surgery, biomaterials, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The research topics frequently addressed by Radisic include:

  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Radisic has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Yimu Zhao
  • Sargol Okhovatian
  • Naimeh Rafatian
  • Rick Xing Ze Lu
  • Shira Landau

Common publication venues for Radisic's work include:

  • Trends in Biotechnology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Advanced Healthcare Materials

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Radisic are:

  • Beyond Polydimethylsiloxane: Alternative Materials for Fabrication of Organ-on-a-Chip Devices and Microphysiological Systems, 2020, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
  • Organs-on-a-chip models for biological research, 2021, Cell
  • Recapitulating Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment through Synergistic Use of Patient Organoids and Organ-on-a-Chip Vasculature, 2020, Advanced Functional Materials
  • A well plate-based multiplexed platform for incorporation of organoids into an organ-on-a-chip system with a perfusable vasculature, 2021, Nature Protocols
  • Green Biomaterials: fundamental principles, 2023, Green Biomaterials

Milica Radisic holds fellowships from professional organizations, including the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) awarded in 2015 and membership in The Canadian Academy of Engineering.

Best Publications

  • Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds.

    Milica Radisic;Hyoungshin Park;Helen Shing;Thomas Consi

  • Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

    Sara S Nunes;Jason W Miklas;Jie Liu;Roozbeh Aschar-Sobbi

  • Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering

    Boyang Zhang;Anastasia Korolj;Benjamin Fook Lun Lai;Milica Radisic

  • Biodegradable scaffold with built-in vasculature for organ-on-a-chip engineering and direct surgical anastomosis

    Boyang Zhang;Miles Montgomery;M. Dean Chamberlain;Shinichiro Ogawa

  • Challenges in Cardiac Tissue Engineering

    Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic;Nina Tandon;Nina Tandon;Amandine Godier;Robert Maidhof

  • A Platform for Generation of Chamber-Specific Cardiac Tissues and Disease Modeling.

    Yimu Zhao;Naimeh Rafatian;Nicole T. Feric;Brian J. Cox

  • Electrical stimulation systems for cardiac tissue engineering.

    Nina Tandon;Christopher Cannizzaro;Pen-Hsiu Grace Chao;Pen-Hsiu Grace Chao;Robert Maidhof

  • A Microfabricated Platform to Measure and Manipulate the Mechanics of Engineered Cardiac Microtissues

    Thomas Boudou;Wesley R. Legant;Anbin Mu;Michael A. Borochin

  • Oxygen gradients correlate with cell density and cell viability in engineered cardiac tissue

    Milica Radisic;Jos Malda;Jos Malda;Eric Epping;Wenliang Geng

  • Organ-on-a-chip devices advance to market

    Boyang Zhang;Milica Radisic

  • Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells

    Bashir Bhana;Rohin K. Iyer;Wen Li Kelly Chen;Ruogang Zhao

  • Flexible shape-memory scaffold for minimally invasive delivery of functional tissues.

    Miles Montgomery;Samad Ahadian;Locke Davenport Huyer;Mauro Lo Rito

  • Medium perfusion enables engineering of compact and contractile cardiac tissue

    Milica Radisic;Liming Yang;Jan Boublik;Richard J. Cohen

  • Biomimetic Approach to Cardiac Tissue Engineering: Oxygen Carriers and Channeled Scaffolds

    Milica Radisic;Hyoungshin Park;Fen Chen;Johanna E. Salazar-Lazzaro

  • High-density seeding of myocyte cells for cardiac tissue engineering

    Milica Radisic;Michelle Euloth;Liming Yang;Robert Langer

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor immobilized in collagen scaffold promotes penetration and proliferation of endothelial cells

    Yi Hao Shen;Molly S. Shoichet;Milica Radisic

  • Advanced Tools for Tissue Engineering: Scaffolds, Bioreactors, and Signaling

    Lisa E. Freed;Farshid Guilak;X. Edward Guo;Martha L. Gray

  • Design and formulation of functional pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues

    Nimalan Thavandiran;Nicole Dubois;Alexander Mikryukov;Stéphane Massé

  • Scaffolds with covalently immobilized VEGF and Angiopoietin-1 for vascularization of engineered tissues.

    Loraine L.Y. Chiu;Milica Radisic

  • Mathematical model of oxygen distribution in engineered cardiac tissue with parallel channel array perfused with culture medium containing oxygen carriers.

    Milica Radisic;William Deen;Robert Langer;Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic

  • Platform technology for scalable assembly of instantaneously functional mosaic tissues

    Boyang Zhang;Miles Montgomery;Locke Davenport-Huyer;Anastasia Korolj

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Columbia University
Peter W. Zandstra
Peter W. Zandstra University of British Columbia
Samad Ahadian
Samad Ahadian University of California, Los Angeles
Peter H. Backx
Peter H. Backx York University
Gordon Keller
Gordon Keller University of Toronto
Christopher S. Chen
Christopher S. Chen Boston University
Yu Sun
Yu Sun University of Toronto
Richard D. Weisel
Richard D. Weisel University Health Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand grows for technology-driven professionals, online education offers flexible options for students aiming to launch or advance their careers in the field. Many universities in the USA now provide specialized programs in emerging sectors such as fintech, user experience, project management, and even sports management.

For creative thinkers, ux degree programs deliver crucial design and technical skills sought after by digital agencies and product teams. If you enjoy leadership and organization, consider that project management degree jobs span nearly every industry, including engineering, construction, and technology.

The tech world is evolving rapidly, and credentials in blockchain or digital currencies are increasingly valuable. Leading institutions are expanding crypto degrees to meet new career opportunities in financial technology and distributed ledger systems. Additionally, those passionate about athletics and management can pursue a future in sports organizations with the online sports management degrees now available from top U.S. colleges.

By choosing the right online pathway, students can tailor their education to fit evolving industry needs and enter high-demand career fields in Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Milica Radisic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles