World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Katja Schenke-Layland

Katja Schenke-Layland

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 64 9658 8915 700 661 252 14768

Katja Schenke-Layland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katja Schenke-Layland between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katja Schenke-Layland published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2020. 10 of the 336 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 50 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 3 publications
2002 2026

336 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katja Schenke-Layland: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 6
2005 2
2006 6
2007 5
2008 10
2009 7
2010 12
2011 14
2012 16
2013 13
2014 10
2015 11
2016 10
2017 17
2018 10
2019 21
2020 50
2021 40
2022 20
2023 24
2024 18
2025 7
2026 3
Total 336
Download as CSV

Katja Schenke-Layland publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katja Schenke-Layland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 247–256 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 252 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510 252
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Katja Schenke-Layland D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katja Schenke-Layland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031 64
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Katja Schenke-Layland is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focused interest in molecular biology, biomedical engineering, surgery, biomaterials, and biophysics.

Their work covers a diverse range of topics including spectroscopy techniques in biomedical and chemical research, 3D printing in biomedical research, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, electrospun nanofibers in biomedical applications, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, pluripotent stem cells research, and spectroscopy and chemometric analyses.

Katja Schenke-Layland has published frequently in several scientific venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Tissue Engineering Part A
  • Tissue Engineering Part C Methods
  • Cancers
  • Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews

Some recent papers of note authored or co-authored by Katja Schenke-Layland include:

  • "Human heart-forming organoids recapitulate early heart and foregut development," 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • "Mapping human haematopoietic stem cells from haemogenic endothelium to birth," 2022, Nature
  • "The extracellular matrix as hallmark of cancer and metastasis: From biomechanics to therapeutic targets," 2024, Science Translational Medicine
  • "A Human Skeletal Muscle Atlas Identifies the Trajectories of Stem and Progenitor Cells across Development and from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells," 2020, Cell Stem Cell
  • "Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in vaccinated individuals," 2021, Nature Communications

Frequent collaborators in their research include Julia Marzi, Heungsoo Shin, Shannon L. Layland, Markus F. Templin, and Eva Brauchle.

Katja Schenke-Layland's research intersects clinical and experimental approaches, contributing to fields such as regenerative medicine and biomedical engineering, with particular emphasis on innovative technologies like 3D printing and nanofiber applications. Their work on SARS-CoV-2 also highlights engagement with pressing global health challenges.

Best Publications

  • Skin tissue engineering--in vivo and in vitro applications.

    Florian Groeber;Monika Holeiter;Monika Holeiter;Martina Hampel;Svenja Hinderer;Svenja Hinderer

  • Three-dimensional electrospun ECM-based hybrid scaffolds for cardiovascular tissue engineering

    Sepideh Heydarkhan-Hagvall;Katja Schenke-Layland;Andrew P. Dhanasopon;Fady Rofail

  • ECM and ECM-like materials – Biomaterials for applications in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy

    Svenja Hinderer;Shannon Lee Layland;Katja Schenke-Layland;Katja Schenke-Layland;Katja Schenke-Layland

  • Impact of decellularization of xenogeneic tissue on extracellular matrix integrity for tissue engineering of heart valves.

    K. Schenke-Layland;O. Vasilevski;F. Opitz;K. König

  • Self-Organized Cerebral Organoids with Human-Specific Features Predict Effective Drugs to Combat Zika Virus Infection

    Momoko Watanabe;Jessie E. Buth;Neda Vishlaghi;Luis de la Torre-Ubieta

  • Cardiac fibrosis - A short review of causes and therapeutic strategies.

    Svenja Hinderer;Katja Schenke-Layland;Katja Schenke-Layland

  • Reprogrammed mouse fibroblasts differentiate into cells of the cardiovascular and hematopoietic lineages.

    Katja Schenke-Layland;Katrin E. Rhodes;Ekaterini Angelis;Yekaterina Butylkova

  • Mapping the first stages of mesoderm commitment during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells

    Denis Evseenko;Yuhua Zhu;Katja Schenke-Layland;Jeffrey Kuo

  • Merging organoid and organ-on-a-chip technology to generate complex multi-layer tissue models in a human retina-on-a-chip platform.

    Kevin Achberger;Christopher Probst;Jasmin Haderspeck;Sylvia Bolz

  • Cell death stages in single apoptotic and necrotic cells monitored by Raman microspectroscopy

    Eva Brauchle;Sibylle Thude;Sara Y. Brucker;Katja Schenke-Layland

  • Human heart-forming organoids recapitulate early heart and foregut development

    Lika Drakhlis;Santoshi Biswanath;Clara-Milena Farr;Victoria Lupanow

  • Impact of heart valve decellularization on 3-D ultrastructure, immunogenicity and thrombogenicity.

    Jianye Zhou;Olaf Fritze;Martina Schleicher;Hans-Peter Wendel

  • Two-photon microscopes and in vivo multiphoton tomographs--powerful diagnostic tools for tissue engineering and drug delivery.

    Katja Schenke-Layland;Iris Riemann;Odile Damour;Ulrich A. Stock

  • Drug and cell delivery for cardiac regeneration

    Conn L. Hastings;Ellen T. Roche;Eduardo Ruiz-Hernandez;Katja Schenke-Layland

  • Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to HOXA+ hemogenic vasculature that resembles the aorta-gonad-mesonephros

    Elizabeth S Ng;Elizabeth S Ng;Lisa Azzola;Freya F Bruveris;Freya F Bruveris;Vincenzo Calvanese

  • cAMP-induced Interleukin-10 promoter activation depends on CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein expression and monocytic differentiation.

    Susanne Brenner;Susanna Prösch;Katja Schenke-Layland;Ulrike Riese

  • Adipose tissue-derived cells improve cardiac function following myocardial infarction.

    Katja Schenke-Layland;Brian M. Strem;Brian M. Strem;Maria C. Jordan;Michael T. DeEmedio

  • Complete dynamic repopulation of decellularized heart valves by application of defined physical signals-an in vitro study.

    K. Schenke-Layland;F. Opitz;M. Gross;C. Döring

  • Multiphoton autofluorescence imaging of intratissue elastic fibers.

    K. König;K. Schenke-Layland;I. Riemann;U.A. Stock

Frequent Co-Authors

Hanna K.A. Mikkola
Hanna K.A. Mikkola University of California, Los Angeles
Dieter P. Reinhardt
Dieter P. Reinhardt McGill University
Dietmar W. Hutmacher
Dietmar W. Hutmacher Queensland University of Technology
Kathrin Plath
Kathrin Plath University of California, Los Angeles
Abhay Pandit
Abhay Pandit University of Galway
marius ueffing
marius ueffing University of Tübingen
Diethelm Wallwiener
Diethelm Wallwiener University of Tübingen
Johannes A. Eble
Johannes A. Eble University of Münster
Olaf Riess
Olaf Riess University of Tübingen
Heungsoo Shin
Heungsoo Shin Hanyang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a diverse set of careers, many of which are growing in demand. For example, students interested in the intersection of healthcare and data may consider whether is medical billing and coding in demand. These roles offer practical experience in healthcare administration and the digital management of medical information.

Those who prefer a broader perspective on healthcare systems might pursue an online health information management degree. This path prepares graduates to organize, analyze, and protect patient data, a skillset increasingly valued by employers.

For students focused on promoting well-being through nutrition science, a masters in nutrition online provides advanced knowledge to work across clinical, community, or research settings.

Lastly, those with a technical interest in medical imaging should consider online sonography certificate programs. These programs combine biology, technology, and patient care, and can be completed remotely for added convenience.

Best Scientists Citing Katja Schenke-Layland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles