World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4963 4601 224 221 199 11745

Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2025. 65 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2025. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 34 publications
2005 2025

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 2
2007 6
2008 6
2009 12
2010 6
2011 7
2012 9
2013 10
2014 10
2015 12
2016 13
2017 9
2018 15
2019 11
2020 28
2021 15
2022 25
2023 20
2024 31
2025 34
Total 282
Download as CSV

Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 199
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and medicine. Their work spans diverse topics within mental health and physical activity, with significant attention to experimental and clinical psychology.

The primary fields of study for Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Key subfields of study cover:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

The scientist's research topics focus on:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Frequent publication venues where Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer's work appears include:

  • Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Collaborations have been established with several co-authors, notable among them:

  • Markus Reichert
  • Marco Giurgiu
  • Heike Tost
  • Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
  • Iris Reinhard

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer include:

  • "Ambulatory assessment for physical activity research: State of the science, best practices and future directions," 2020, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • "Digital mental health: challenges and next steps," 2023, BMJ Mental Health
  • "Digital phenotyping: towards replicable findings with comprehensive assessments and integrative models in bipolar disorders," 2020, International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
  • "High-frequency ecological momentary assessment of emotional and interpersonal states preceding and following self-injury in female adolescents," 2020, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Ambulatory assessment for precision psychiatry: Foundations, current developments and future avenues," 2021, Experimental Neurology

Best Publications

  • Ambulatory Assessment

    Unknown

  • Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation.

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Timothy J. Trull

  • Using experience sampling methods/ecological momentary assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: introduction to the special section.

    Timothy J. Trull;Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

  • Motives for nonsuicidal self-injury among women with borderline personality disorder.

    Nikolaus Kleindienst;Martin Bohus;Petra Ludäscher;Matthias F. Limberger

  • Analytic strategies for understanding affective (in)stability and other dynamic processes in psychopathology.

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Michael Eid;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Simon Stabenow

  • State affective instability in borderline personality disorder assessed by ambulatory monitoring

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Janice Kuo;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Stacy S. Welch

  • Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as a potentially aggravating factor in borderline personality disorder

    Alexandra Philipsen;Matthias F. Limberger;Klaus Lieb;Bernd Feige

  • The Role of Ambulatory Assessment in Psychological Science

    Timothy J. Trull;Ulrich Ebner-Priemer

  • Affective Dynamics in Psychopathology

    Timothy J. Trull;Sean P. Lane;Peter Koval;Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

  • Psychophysiological ambulatory assessment of affective dysregulation in borderline personality disorder.

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Stacy S. Welch;Paul Grossman;Thomas Reisch

  • Affective dysregulation and dissociative experience in female patients with borderline personality disorder: a startle response study.

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Sandra Badeck;Cornelia Beckmann;Amy Wagner

  • Ambulatory Assessment : An Innovative and Promising Approach for Clinical Psychology

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Timothy J. Trull

  • Neural correlates of individual differences in affective benefit of real-life urban green space exposure.

    Heike Tost;Markus Reichert;Markus Reichert;Urs Braun;Iris Reinhard

  • Dissociative symptoms are positively related to stress in borderline personality disorder

    C. E. Stiglmayr;U. W. Ebner-Priemer;J. Bretz;R. Behm

  • Dissociation predicts poor response to Dialectial Behavioral Therapy in female patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.

    Nikolaus Kleindienst;Matthias F Limberger;Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer;Jana Keibel-Mauchnik

  • A valence-dependent group-specific recall bias of retrospective self-reports: a study of borderline personality disorder in everyday life.

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Janice Kuo;Stacy Shaw Welch;Tanja Thielgen

  • Ecological momentary assessment in borderline personality disorder: a review of recent findings and methodological challenges.

    Philip Santangelo;Martin Bohus;Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

  • Digital mental health: challenges and next steps

    Unknown

  • Emotional learning during dissociative states in borderline personality disorder

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Jana Mauchnik;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Christian Schmahl

  • Unraveling Affective Dysregulation in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Marlies Houben;Philip Santangelo;Nikolaus Kleindienst

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Bohus
Martin Bohus Central Institute of Mental Health
Nikolaus Kleindienst
Nikolaus Kleindienst Heidelberg University
Christian Schmahl
Christian Schmahl Heidelberg University
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Heidelberg University
Heike Tost
Heike Tost Heidelberg University
Timothy J. Trull
Timothy J. Trull University of Missouri
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein University of Freiburg
Christine Kuehner
Christine Kuehner Central Institute of Mental Health
Alexander Zipf
Alexander Zipf Heidelberg University
Michael Kaess
Michael Kaess University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology degrees open doors to several career pathways, especially in fields like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students in the USA choose online degrees for their flexibility and accessibility, enabling them to study while managing work or personal commitments.

If you are considering a career in social work, it is essential to understand the educational requirements, which vary by state. For instance, the Colorado minimum degree requirement for social workers typically includes at least a Bachelor’s in Social Work (BSW), with advanced roles requiring a Master’s (MSW). In Connecticut, pursuing a social work career means meeting the Connecticut education requirements for social workers, which often require an MSW and state licensure.

Each state sets its own standards. Knowing the Delaware minimum degree requirement for social workers is crucial before applying for jobs there. Similarly, those aiming to practice in Florida should review the Florida education requirements for social workers to ensure they pursue the correct credentials and licensing.

Researching state-specific pathways helps future professionals select the right online degree, prepare for licensure, and launch a successful psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

Trending Scientists