World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mary Ann Parris Stephens

Mary Ann Parris Stephens

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3925 3621 2196 1978 118 9106

Mary Ann Parris Stephens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Ann Parris Stephens between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Ann Parris Stephens published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2003. 1 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2003. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1982 2024

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Ann Parris Stephens: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 4
1985 1
1986 5
1987 3
1988 2
1989 4
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 6
1998 3
1999 4
2000 5
2001 1
2002 6
2003 9
2004 1
2005 3
2006 5
2007 4
2008 0
2009 4
2010 2
2011 3
2012 3
2013 9
2014 5
2015 1
2016 6
2017 3
2018 3
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 120
Download as CSV

Mary Ann Parris Stephens publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Ann Parris Stephens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Ann Parris Stephens D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Ann Parris Stephens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mary Ann Parris Stephens is affiliated with Kent State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Medicine and Psychology. Within these fields, their work touches upon several subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, Neurology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's main research topics include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions, Tryptophan and brain disorders, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Diabetes Management and Education, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Mindfulness, Education, and Exercise for age-related cognitive decline: Study protocol, pilot study results, and description of the baseline sample (2020) in Clinical Trials
  • Spouses' responses to the dietary nonadherence of their partners managing diabetes (2020) in Personal Relationships
  • Capacity building to address antimicrobial resistance in remote Australia: The inaugural HOT NORTH Antimicrobial Academy (2024) in Infection Disease & Health

Mary Ann Parris Stephens frequently collaborates with a diverse group of co-authors, including:

  • Julie Loebach Wetherell
  • Hayley S. Ripperger
  • Michelle Voegtle
  • Beau M. Ances
  • David A. Balota

Their work has been published in several venues, notably Clinical Trials, Personal Relationships, and Infection Disease & Health.

In recognition of contributions to the field, Mary Ann Parris Stephens was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1999.

Best Publications

  • Stress Reduction for Family Caregivers: Effects of Adult Day Care Use

    Steven H. Zarit;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Aloen Townsend;Rickey Greene

  • Hassles and uplifts of giving care to a family member with dementia.

    Jennifer M. Kinney;Mary Ann Parris Stephens

  • Predictors of Institutionalization of Cognitively Impaired Elders Family Help and the Timing of Placement

    Joseph E. Gaugler;Anne B. Edwards;Elia E. Femia;Steven H. Zarit

  • Spouses' provision of health-related support and control to patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation.

    Melissa M. Franks;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Karen S. Rook;Barry A. Franklin

  • Balancing Parent Care With Other Roles Interrole Conflict of Adult Daughter Caregivers

    Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Aloen L. Townsend;Lynn M. Martire;Jennifer Ann Druley

  • The caregiver stress process and health outcomes.

    Juheui Son;Amy Erno;Dennis G. Shea;Elia E. Femia

  • Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response to acute psychosocial stress: Effects of biological sex and circulating sex hormones

    Mary Ann C. Stephens;Pamela B. Mahon;Mary E. McCaul;Gary S. Wand

  • Centrality of women's multiple roles: beneficial and detrimental consequences for psychological well-being.

    Lynn M. Martire;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Aloen L. Townsend

  • Where two roles intersect: spillover between parent care and employment.

    Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Melissa M. Franks;Audie A. Atienza

  • Adult day service use and reductions in caregiving hours: effects on stress and psychological well-being for dementia caregivers.

    Joseph E. Gaugler;Shannon E. Jarrott;Steven H. Zarit;Mary Ann Parris Stephens

  • Negative reactions to received spousal care: predictors and consequences of miscarried support.

    Lynn M. Martire;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Jennifer A. Druley;William C. Wojno

  • Affective and cognitive antecedents to eating episodes in bulimia and binge eating

    Victoria M. Lingswiler;Janis H. Crowther;M. A. Stephens

  • Longitudinal patterns of risk for depression in dementia caregivers: objective and subjective primary stress as predictors.

    Mary E. Liming Alspaugh;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Aloen L. Townsend;Steven H. Zarit

  • Stressors and Well-Being Among Caregivers to Older Adults with Dementia: The In-Home Versus Nursing Home Experience

    Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Jennifer M. Kinney;Paula K. Ogrocki

  • Influences of spousal support and control on diabetes management through physical activity.

    Cynthia M. Khan;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Melissa M. Franks;Karen S. Rook

  • Stress and rewards in women's multiple roles: the case of women in the middle.

    Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Melissa M. Franks;Aloen L. Townsend

  • Respite for dementia caregivers: the effects of adult day service use on caregiving hours and care demands.

    Joseph E. Gaugler;Shannon E. Jarrott;Steven H. Zarit;Mary Ann Parris Stephens

  • The Interplay of Work and Caregiving: Relationships between Role Satisfaction, Role Involvement, and Caregivers' Well-being

    Lynn M. Martire;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Audie A. Atienza

  • Comparisons of African American and White Women in the Parent Care Role

    Tracela M. White;Aloen L. Townsend;Mary Ann Parris Stephens

  • Couples' Support Provision During Illness: The Role of Perceived Emotional Responsiveness

    Erin M. Fekete;Mary Ann Parris Stephens;Kristin D. Mickelson;Jennifer Ann Druley

  • The Etiology Of Bulimia Nervosa : The Individual And Familial Context: Material Arising From The Second Annual Kent Psychology Forum, Kent, October 1990

    Janis H. Crowther;Stevan E. Hobfoll;Mary A. Stephens;Daniel L. Tennenbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Aloen L. Townsend
Aloen L. Townsend Case Western Reserve University
Melissa M. Franks
Melissa M. Franks Purdue University West Lafayette
Lynn M. Martire
Lynn M. Martire Pennsylvania State University
Karen S. Rook
Karen S. Rook University of California, Irvine
Steven H. Zarit
Steven H. Zarit Pennsylvania State University
Janis H. Crowther
Janis H. Crowther Kent State University
Joseph E. Gaugler
Joseph E. Gaugler University of Minnesota
Richard Schulz
Richard Schulz University of Pittsburgh
Francis J. Keefe
Francis J. Keefe Duke University
Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens a range of online degrees and career pathways, particularly in areas like marriage and family therapy (MFT). Many professionals are drawn to this field due to the potential to make a positive impact on individuals and families. Earning an online psychology degree can be a flexible route, but it’s important to understand the specific requirements in your state or city.

For those interested in MFT, requirements vary by location. For example, learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Henderson or discover the Honolulu mft education requirements if you’re based in Hawaii. In Texas, consider the steps for how to become an mft in Houston, and for those in Alabama, review the Huntsville mft education requirements.

Each path typically involves a blend of advanced education, supervised clinical experience, and passing a licensing exam. By selecting the right online program and staying aware of local requirements, you can confidently plan your career in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Ann Parris Stephens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles