World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
7373
World Ranking
5036
National Ranking
354

Mel Gray publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mel Gray sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 209 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mel Gray D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mel Gray sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mel Gray is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in the social sciences and health professions. Their scholarly work primarily focuses on social work education and practice, homelessness and social issues, youth education and societal dynamics, rural development and sustainability, healthcare innovation and challenges, mental health and patient involvement, as well as social policy and reform studies.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Progress of the social service professions in South Africa's developmental social welfare system: Social work, and child and youth care work (2022) in the International Journal of Social Welfare
  • A critical review of Chinese and international social work: Walking a tightrope between local and global standards (2021) in International Social Work
  • Carving a Professional Identity for Chinese Social Work Shaped by Universalisation, Indigenisation, and Culturalism (2023) in The British Journal of Social Work
  • Enhancing the relevance of social work education in Nigeria (2022) in The British Journal of Social Work
  • Advancing scholarship on rural social work in China: published researchers' perspectives (2024) in Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development

Mel Gray frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Qian Meng
  • Solomon Amadasun
  • Lieve Bradt
  • Griet Roets
  • Antoinette Lombard

Their publications often appear in prominent social work and social welfare journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • International Social Work
  • The British Journal of Social Work
  • Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
  • International Journal of Social Welfare
  • Social Development Issues

The main fields of study for Mel Gray's research encompass social sciences and health professions. Their work within subfields covers public administration, general health professions, sociology and political science, education, and general agricultural and biological sciences.

Best Publications

  • The quest for a universal social work: some issues and implications

    Mel Gray;Jan Fook

  • Dilemmas of international social work: paradoxical processes in indigenisation, universalism and imperialism

    Mel Gray

  • Environmental Social Work

    Mel Gray;John Coates;Tiani Hetherington

  • Evidence-based Social Work: A Critical Stance

    Mel M Gray;Deborah Plath;Stephen A Webb

  • An ‘Ecospiritual’ Perspective: Finally, a Place for Indigenous Approaches

    John Coates;Mel Gray;Tiani Hetherington

  • Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: A Review of the Empirical Research Literature

    Mel M Gray;Elyssa Joy;Deborah Plath;Stephen A Webb

  • Social work : theories and methods

    Mel Gray;Stephen A. Webb

  • Indigenous Social Work around the World: Towards Culturally Relevant Education and Practice

    Mel Gray;John Coates;Michael Yellow Bird

  • Social enterprise: is it the business of social work?

    Mel Gray;Karen Healy;Penny Crofts

  • Back to basics : a critique of the strengths perspective in social work

    Mel Gray

  • The New Politics of Social Work

    Mel Gray;Stephen A. Webb

  • The progress of social development in South Africa

    Mel Gray

  • ‘Indigenization’ and knowledge development: Extending the debate

    Mel Gray;John Coates

  • Factors that influence the professional resilience of occupational therapists in mental health practice.

    Samantha E. Ashby;Susan Ryan;Mel Gray;Carole James

  • Decolonizing Social Work

    John Coates;Tiani Hetherington;Mel Gray

  • Moral Sources and Emergent Ethical Theories in Social Work

    Mel Gray

  • Pursuing good practice? The limits of evidence-based practice

    Mel Gray;Catherine Mcdonald

  • An integrated and experience-based approach to social work education: The Newcastle model

    Jill Gibbons;Mel Gray

  • Environmental ethics for social work: Social work's responsibility to the non-human world

    Mel Gray;John Coates

  • The environment and social work: An overview and introduction

    John Coates;Mel Gray

  • Viewing Spirituality in Social Work through the Lens of Contemporary Social Theory

    Mel Gray

  • The SAGE Handbook of Social Work

    Mel Gray;Stephen A. Webb;James Midgley

Frequent Co-Authors

Brid Featherstone
Brid Featherstone University of Huddersfield
Jan Fook
Jan Fook Northumbria University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide range of flexible and accessible online education options in the USA. For students eager to enter the workforce quickly, one year masters programs online offer accelerated curriculums, helping you gain advanced qualifications in less time.

Similarly, those starting their academic journey or looking to switch fields may benefit from online accelerated bachelor degree programs, which condense the traditional undergraduate timeline for faster degree completion.

Pursuing a career in social work is more affordable than ever with cheapest online msw options that prioritize quality education while keeping tuition costs low. If your interests lean toward behavioral analysis, consider bcba accredited programs online that prepare graduates to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, a sought-after credential in both educational and healthcare settings.

Each of these online pathways provides flexible alternatives for students balancing work, family, or other commitments, while also supporting long-term career advancement in the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mel Gray

Trending Scientists