World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
9526
World Ranking
6112
National Ranking
993

Jan Fook publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Fook sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jan Fook D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Fook sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Fook is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom and contributes to research in the Social Sciences, particularly within the subfield of Public Administration. The primary focus of their work centers on Social Work Education and Practice.

The scientist has authored publications in the journal Palliative Care and Social Practice. One notable recent paper is titled "The social work contribution in end-of-life care," published in 2025 in the same journal.

Frequent collaborators in research include Brenda Salomon, Timothy Sim, Wanda Heading-Grant, Ken Bechtel, and Kate Ball Clem. This cohort has worked together across several projects, reflecting interdisciplinary cooperation in related thematic areas.

Key topics explored by Jan Fook are:

  • Social Work Education and Practice

Main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences

Subfields of study include:

  • Public Administration

Best Publications

  • Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice

    Jan Oz Fook

  • Social Work: A Critical Approach to Practice

    Jan Fook

  • Professional Expertise: Practice, Theory and Education for Working in Uncertainty

    J. Fook;M. Ryan;L. Hawkins

  • Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern Critical Perspectives

    Bob Pease;Jan Fook

  • Challenges of Critical Reflection: ‘Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained’

    Jan Fook;Gurid Aga Askeland

  • The quest for a universal social work: some issues and implications

    Mel Gray;Jan Fook

  • The Reflective Researcher: Social Workers' Theories of Practice Research

    Jan Fook

  • Theorizing from Practice: Towards an Inclusive Approach for Social Work Research

    Jan Fook

  • Critical reflection : a review of contemporary literature and understandings

    Susan White;Jan Fook;Fiona Gardner

  • Critical reflection in health and social care

    Susan White;Jan Fook;Fiona Gardner

  • Critical Social Work: The Current Issues

    Jan Fook

  • Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection

    Jan Fook

  • Towards a Theory of Social Work Expertise

    Jan Fook;Martin Ryan;Linette Hawkins

  • Beyond Reflective Practice: Reworking the ‘critical’ in critical reflection

    Jan Fook

  • The 'critical' in critical reflection.

    Jan Fook;Gurid Aga Askeland

  • Postmodern Critical Theory and Emancipatory Social Work Practice

    B. Pease;Jan Fook

  • The importance of pet loss and some implications for services

    Christine Morley;Jan Fook

  • Deconstructing and reconstructing professional expertise

    Jan Fook

  • Reflexivity as Method

    Jan Fook

  • Practice and research in social work : postmodern feminist perspectives

    Barbara Fawcett;Brid Featherstone;Jan Fook;Amy Rossiter

  • Critical reflectivity in education and practice

    Jan Fook

  • Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education

    Jan Fook;F. Lindsey;Martin Ryan

Frequent Co-Authors

Bob Pease
Bob Pease University of Tasmania
Susan W. White
Susan W. White University of Alabama
Brid Featherstone
Brid Featherstone University of Huddersfield
Mel Gray
Mel Gray University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse professional opportunities. In the U.S., online degree programs cater to students seeking flexible study options, whether you’re interested in mental health, counseling, or community work.

For those passionate about supporting individuals and communities, a cacrep online masters in counseling offers a specialized path to becoming a licensed counselor. If your interests lie in helping families thrive, consider pursuing online marriage and family therapy programs, which focus on strengthening family relationships and mental well-being.

Alternatively, a bachelor of science in psychology is a versatile credential that can lead to entry-level roles in healthcare, education, human resources, or as a foundation for advanced studies. For those aiming to make a social impact, an msw degree online prepares graduates for licensure and careers in social work, advocacy, and public service.

With flexible formats and a range of focus areas, these online degrees empower you to advance your career and make a difference in society.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Fook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles