World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Helen R. Winefield

Helen R. Winefield

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3436 3170 178 173 235 11408

Helen R. Winefield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helen R. Winefield between 1973 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helen R. Winefield published across 50 years, from 1973 to 2022, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2015. 2 of the 248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2015. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications
1973 2022

248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helen R. Winefield: publications per year, 1973 to 2022
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 2
1978 0
1979 2
1980 2
1981 1
1982 4
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 8
1988 5
1989 6
1990 9
1991 11
1992 12
1993 6
1994 6
1995 8
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 2
2000 6
2001 11
2002 3
2003 6
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 6
2008 6
2009 8
2010 8
2011 13
2012 8
2013 13
2014 8
2015 16
2016 9
2017 10
2018 1
2019 4
2020 3
2021 0
2022 2
Total 248
Download as CSV

Helen R. Winefield publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen R. Winefield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 235 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 235
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Helen R. Winefield D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen R. Winefield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Helen R. Winefield is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research encompasses several topics related to human-animal interactions, agriculture, aging, and cognitive health.

The scientist's recent published papers include:

  • "Are stronger bonds better? Examining the relationship between the human-animal bond and human social support, and its impact on resilience," 2020, published in Australian Psychologist
  • "It's not how old you are, it's how you are old": Australian clinical psychologists' experiences of working with older adults, 2020, published in Professional Psychology Research and Practice

Frequent co-authors associated with Helen R. Winefield include:

  • Lian Hill
  • Pauleen C. Bennett
  • Brianna Morante
  • Lynn Ward

Thevenues where Helen R. Winefield has most often published are:

  • Australian Psychologist
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice

The subfields of study connected to their work include:

  • Genetics
  • Plant Science
  • Small Animals
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Main topics explored in Helen R. Winefield's research are:

  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Best Publications

  • Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: Frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon

    Sandra J. Neuling;Helen R. Winefield

  • Psychological well-being and psychological distress: is it necessary to measure both?

    Helen R Winefield;Tiffany K Gill;Anne W Taylor;Rhiannon M Pilkington

  • Psychosocial job strain and productivity in human service workers: A test of the demand-control-support model.

    Maureen F. Dollard;Helen R. Winefield;Anthony H. Winefield;Jan de Jonge

  • Social Support and Psychological Well-Being in Young Adults: The Multi-Dimensional Support Scale

    Helen R. Winefield;Anthony H. Winefield;Marika Tiggemann

  • Evaluating the outcome of communication skill teaching for entry-level medical students: does knowledge of empathy increase?

    Helen R Winefield;Anna Chur-Hansen

  • A longitudinal study of the psychological effects of unemployment and unsatisfactory employment on young adults.

    Anthony H. Winefield;Helen R. Winefield;Marika Tiggemann;Robert D. Goldney

  • Workplace stress, mental health, and burnout of veterinarians in Australia.

    PH Hatch;HR Winefield;Bruce Christie;Jan Lievaart

  • Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies.

    Maria Teresa Nano;Peter Grantley Gill;James Kollias;Melissa Anne Bochner

  • Needs of Family Caregivers in Chronic Schizophrenia

    Helen R. Winefield;Eileen J. Harvey

  • Breast and Prostate Cancer Online Discussion Boards A Thematic Analysis of Gender Differences and Similarities

    Rebecca J. Gooden;Helen R. Winefield

  • Unique Aspects of Stress in Human Service Work

    M.F. Dollard;C. Dormann;C.M. Boyd;H.R. Winefield

  • The role of depression and anxiety symptoms in hospital readmissions after cardiac surgery

    Phillip J Tully;Phillip J Tully;Robert Ashley Baker;Deborah Turnbull;Helen Russell Winefield

  • Determinants of Psychological Distress in Relatives of People With Chronic Schizophrenia

    Helen R. Winefield;Eileen J. Harvey

  • Mental health implications of human attachment to companion animals.

    Jasmin Peacock;Anna Chur-Hansen;Helen Winefield

  • Determinants of adherence in adults with cystic fibrosis

    Lisa J Kettler;S M Sawyer;H R Winefield;H W Greville

  • Occupational Stress in the Service Professions

    Maureen F. Dollard;Helen R. Winefield;Anthony H. Winefield

  • Health Effects of Ownership of and Attachment to Companion Animals in an Older Population

    Helen R. Winefield;Anne Black;Anna Chur-Hansen

  • Growing Up With Unemployment: A Longitudinal Study of its Psychological Impact

    Anthony Harold Winefield;Marika Tiggemann;Helen R. Winefield;Robert D. Goldney

  • Hindrances are not threats: advancing the multidimensionality of work stress.

    Michelle R. Tuckey;Ben. J. Searle;Carolyn M. Boyd;Anthony H. Winefield

  • The influence of emotional labour and emotional work on the occupational health and wellbeing of South Australian hospital nurses

    Sandra L. Pisaniello;Helen R. Winefield;Paul H. Delfabbro

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony H. Winefield
Anthony H. Winefield University of South Australia
Marika Tiggemann
Marika Tiggemann Flinders University
Anna Chur-Hansen
Anna Chur-Hansen University of Adelaide
Maureen F. Dollard
Maureen F. Dollard University of South Australia
Deborah Turnbull
Deborah Turnbull University of Adelaide
Phillip J. Tully
Phillip J. Tully University of Adelaide
Paul Delfabbro
Paul Delfabbro University of Adelaide
Anne W. Taylor
Anne W. Taylor University of Adelaide
Charli Sargent
Charli Sargent Central Queensland University
Anne Hammarström
Anne Hammarström Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide variety of career opportunities, especially in counseling and mental health fields. One of the most sought-after pathways is becoming a substance abuse counselor. With the rise in demand across the country, many are interested in understanding how to become a substance abuse counselor in Irving and other major cities.

Educational requirements and licensure can differ by location. For example, the Jacksonville substance abuse counselors education requirements may not be the same as those in other regions. It's vital for aspiring professionals to be aware of the local criteria, such as state certification, supervised practice hours, and specific coursework.

In cities like Jersey City, regulations can be quite distinct. You can review substance abuse counselor requirements in Jersey City to get a clearer picture of local expectations. Similarly, if you are curious about the steps involved elsewhere, the guide on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Kansas City provides helpful insights. Researching and comparing requirements across different regions will help you make informed decisions when planning your future in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Helen R. Winefield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles