World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6547 6093 299 287 101 13345

Jan de Jonge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan de Jonge between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan de Jonge published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2010. 8 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2010. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan de Jonge: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 5
2002 3
2003 3
2004 9
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 8
2009 7
2010 10
2011 2
2012 4
2013 3
2014 5
2015 2
2016 3
2017 3
2018 7
2019 5
2020 4
2021 4
2022 4
2023 2
2024 4
2025 4
Total 121
Download as CSV

Jan de Jonge publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan de Jonge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan de Jonge D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan de Jonge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan de Jonge is affiliated with the Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and health professions. Within these domains, their work focuses on several subfields including general health professions, social psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, clinical psychology, and orthopedics and sports medicine.

Their scholarly contributions cover a range of topics, notably:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business

Jan de Jonge has published frequently in several academic venues. Key journals include:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Industrial Health
  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • The Journal of Psychology
  • Human Performance

Highlighted recent papers authored or coauthored by Jan de Jonge include:

  • Does Match Really Matter? The Moderating Role of Resources in the Relation between Demands, Vigor and Fatigue in Academic Life, 2021, The Journal of Psychology
  • Mental Recovery and Running-Related Injuries in Recreational Runners: The Moderating Role of Passion for Running, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Other notable recent publications where Jan de Jonge appears as a coauthor are:

  • Employee Sustainable Performance (E-SuPer): Theoretical Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Psychometric Properties, 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Workaholism: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, 2023, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • The "underrecovery trap": When physical fatigue impairs the physical and mental recovery process, 2020, Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Toon W. Taris
  • Maria C. W. Peeters
  • Tianchang Ji
  • Yannick A. Balk
  • Luuk van Iperen

Jan de Jonge's research integrates themes of psychological and physical recovery, workplace well-being, motivation in sports, and sustainable employee performance. Their interdisciplinary work contributes to academic understanding across psychology, health professions, and organizational behavior.

Best Publications

  • Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies

    Natasja van Vegchel;Jan de Jonge;Hans Bosma;Wilmar Schaufeli

  • Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study.

    Jan de Jonge;Hans Bosma;Richard Peter;Johannes Siegrist

  • Stressors, Resources, and Strain at Work: A Longitudinal Test of the Triple-Match Principle.

    Jan de Jonge;Christian Dormann

  • Specific determinants of intrinsic work motivation, burnout and turnover intentions: a study among nurses

    Peter P.M. Janssen;Jan De Jonge;Arnold B. Bakker

  • Testing reciprocal relationships between job characteristics and psychological well-being: A cross-lagged structural equation model

    Jan de Jonge;Jan de Jonge;Christian Dormann;Peter P. M. Janssen;Maureen F. Dollard

  • Job characteristics and employee well-being: a test of Warr's Vitamin Model in health care workers using structural equation modelling

    Jan De Jonge;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • A Critical Examination of the Demand-Control-Support Model from a Work Psychological Perspective

    Jan de Jonge;Michiel A. J. Kompier

  • Specific determinants of intrinsic work motivation, emotional exhaustion and turnover intention: A multisample longitudinal study

    Inge Houkes;Peter P.M. Janssen;Jan de Jonge;Arnold B. Bakker

  • Stress and Student Job Design: Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Performance in University Students

    Sarah J. Cotton;Maureen F. Dollard;Jan de Jonge

  • Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach

    Marc van Veldhoven;Jan de Jonge;Sjaak Broersen;Michiel Kompier

  • Psychosocial job strain and productivity in human service workers: A test of the demand-control-support model.

    Maureen F. Dollard;Helen R. Winefield;Anthony H. Winefield;Jan de Jonge

  • Specific relationships between work characteristics and intrinsic work motivation, burnout and turnover intention: A multi-sample analysis

    Inge Houkes;Peter P.M. Janssen;Jan de Jonge;Frans J.N. Nijhuis

  • The demand-control model : specific demands, specific control and well-defined groups

    de J Jan Jonge;MF Dollard;C Dormann;Le Pm Pascale Blanc

  • Emotional job demands and the role of matching job resources: A cross-sectional survey study among health care workers

    Jan de Jonge;Pascale M. Le Blanc;Maria C.W. Peeters;Hanneke Noordam

  • Moving European research on work and ageing forward : Overview and agenda

    René Schalk;Marc Van Veldhoven;Annet H. de Lange;Hans De Witte

  • Occupational stress in (inter)action: the interplay between job demands and job resources

    Natasja van Vegchel;Jan de Jonge;Paul A. Landsbergis

  • Specific relationships between job demands, job resources and psychological outcomes and the mediating role of negative work–home interference

    Peter P.M. Janssen;Maria C.W. Peeters;Jan de Jonge;Inge Houkes

  • Linear and nonlinear relations between psychosocial job characteristics, subjective outcomes, and sickness absence : baseline results from SMASH

    J. de Jonge;M.M.E.N. Reuvers;I.L.D. Houtman;P.M. Bongers

  • “Take a break?!” Off-job recovery, job demands, and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity

    Jan de Jonge;Ellen Spoor;Sabine Sonnentag;Christian Dormann

  • Comparing Group and Individual Level Assessments of Job Characteristics in Testing the Job Demand-Control Model: A Multilevel Approach

    Jan de Jonge;Gerard J. P. van Breukelen;Jan A. Landeweerd;Frans J. N. Nijhuis

  • The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology

    Saar Langelaan;Jan de Jonge

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen F. Dollard
Maureen F. Dollard University of South Australia
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Maria C. W. Peeters
Maria C. W. Peeters Utrecht University
Johannes Siegrist
Johannes Siegrist Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Annet H. de Lange
Annet H. de Lange Open University in the Netherlands
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Akihito Shimazu
Akihito Shimazu Keio University
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a wide range of rewarding careers, especially in mental health counseling. Online psychology programs provide flexible pathways to earn the credentials needed for these roles. Each state and city has specific steps and educational requirements, so it’s important to research the guidelines in your area.

For example, those interested in working in North Carolina should review the Greensboro mental health counselor certification requirements. Similarly, if you're planning a career in Nevada, understanding the mental health counselor requirements in Henderson is crucial.

Opportunities also abound in Hawaii, where you can learn how to become a mental health counselor in Honolulu. For those in Texas, see what it takes to become a mental health counselor in Houston.

No matter where you choose to study or work, researching local licensure rules and pursuing accredited online degrees can help you build a successful career in counseling and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Jan de Jonge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles