World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anja Van den Broeck

Anja Van den Broeck

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
15200
World Ranking
6803
National Ranking
95

Anja Van den Broeck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anja Van den Broeck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anja Van den Broeck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anja Van den Broeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anja Van den Broeck is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has focused extensively on research related to psychology, business, management, and health professions. Their work spans multiple subfields including social psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, applied psychology, clinical psychology, and general health professions.

Their recent publications illustrate a predominant interest in motivation, work engagement, and psychological needs. Notable papers include:

  • Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory's multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation, 2021, Organizational Psychology Review
  • Interpersonal supports for basic psychological needs and their relations with motivation, well-being, and performance: A meta-analysis, 2024, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory, 2020, Motivation and Emotion
  • A Corporate Purpose as an Antecedent to Employee Motivation and Work Engagement, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Engaging leadership: Enhancing work engagement through intrinsic values and need satisfaction, 2021, Human Resource Development Quarterly

Co-authorship collaborations have been consistent with several researchers over multiple publications. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Sebastiaan Rothmann
  • Hans De Witte
  • Charlotte Vanovenberghe
  • Emelien Lauwerier
  • Marc Du Bois

The research has been published across various academic venues, with recurring contributions in:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • BRQ Business Research Quarterly
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

The scientist's main topics of work primarily inform understandings of workplace and organizational phenomena, including:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences

In addition to journal articles, scholarly contributions include book publications, such as a title addressing occupational health research, published in 2020 by Frontiers Media.

Best Publications

  • Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction

    Anja Van den Broeck;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Hans De Witte;Willy Lens

  • Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale

    Anja Van den Broeck;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Hans De Witte;Bart Soenens

  • A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work

    Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck;D. Lance Ferris;Chu Hsiang Chang;Christopher C. Rosen

  • The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries

    Marylène Gagné;Jacques Forest;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Laurence Crevier-Braud

  • On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach.

    Maarten Vansteenkiste;Bart Neyrinck;Christopher P. Niemiec;Bart Soenens

  • Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands-Resources model.

    Anja Van den Broeck;Nele De Cuyper;Hans De Witte;Maarten Vansteenkiste

  • Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach

    Joshua Howard;Marylène Gagné;Alexandre J. S. Morin;Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck

  • Discouraging Bullying: The Role of Ethical Leadership and its Effects on the Work Environment

    Jeroen Stouten;Elfi Baillien;Anja Van den Broeck;Jeroen Camps

  • Moving European research on work and ageing forward : Overview and agenda

    René Schalk;Marc Van Veldhoven;Annet H. de Lange;Hans De Witte

  • Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation:

    Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck;Joshua L. Howard;Yves Van Vaerenbergh;Hannes Leroy

  • The mediating role of frustration of psychological needs in the relationship between job insecurity and work related well–being

    Tinne Vander Elst;Anja Van den Broeck;Hans De Witte;Nele De Cuyper

  • Unraveling the Importance of the Quantity and the Quality of Workers' Motivation for Well-Being: A Person-Centered Perspective.

    Anja Van den Broeck;Willy Lens;Willy Lens;Hans De Witte;Hans De Witte;Hermina Van Coillie

  • Work design influences: A synthesis of multilevel factors that affect the design of jobs

    Sharon K. Parker;Anja Van den Broeck;David Holman

  • Does Extrinsic Goal Framing Enhance Extrinsic Goal-Oriented Individuals' Learning and Performance? An Experimental Test of the Match Perspective versus Self-Determination Theory.

    Maarten Vansteenkiste;Tinneke Timmermans;Willy Lens;Bart Soenens

  • How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: implications for work effort

    Rein De Cooman;Dave Stynen;Dave Stynen;Anja Van den Broeck;Luc Sels

  • Understanding Workaholics' Motivations: A Self-Determination Perspective

    Anja Van den Broeck;Bert Herman Schreurs;Hans De Witte;Maarten Vansteenkiste

  • Do job resources affect work engagement via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis

    Marcela Quiñones;Anja Van den Broeck;Hans De Witte;Hans De Witte

  • On the reciprocal relationship between job insecurity and employee well‐being: Mediation by perceived control?

    Tinne Vander Elst;Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck;Nele De Cuyper;Hans De Witte;Hans De Witte

  • Job demands–resources predicting burnout and work engagement among Belgian home health care nurses: A cross-sectional study

    Tinne Vander Elst;Carolien Cavents;Katrien Daneels;Kristien Johannik

  • Not Extent of Telecommuting, But Job Characteristics as Proximal Predictors of Work-Related Well-Being.

    Tinne Vander Elst;Ronny Verhoogen;Maarten Sercu;Anja Van den Broeck

  • Self-determination theory: A theoretical and empirical overview in occupational health psychology

    Anja Van den Broeck;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Hans De Witte

  • The mediating role of psychological needs in the relation between qualitative job insecurity and counterproductive work behavior

    Anja Van den Broeck;Coralia Sulea;Tinne Vander Elst;Gabriel Fischmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Maarten Vansteenkiste Ghent University
Willy Lens
Willy Lens KU Leuven
Bart Soenens
Bart Soenens Ghent University
Marylène Gagné
Marylène Gagné Curtin University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Sebastiaan Rothmann
Sebastiaan Rothmann North-West University
Sharon K. Parker
Sharon K. Parker Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology online provides flexibility and access to diverse programs across the U.S. Many universities now offer accredited online psychology degrees, including affordable options for students trying to manage costs. Choosing the right program is crucial, as it can influence future career opportunities in counseling, research, mental health services, and more.

For those looking to reduce tuition expenses, there are several regional options to consider. For example, the cheapest online psychology programs in Pennsylvania provide quality education at a lower cost, making higher education more accessible. If you reside further south, you might explore affordable online psychology programs in Texas, which are designed for budget-conscious learners.

Localized programs also offer unique advantages. The most affordable psychology degree programs in Bethlehem or affordable psychology programs in Boca Raton may be ideal if you prefer to study near home but still want online flexibility. No matter your location, pursuing an online psychology degree can open rewarding career pathways in human services, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Anja Van den Broeck

Trending Scientists