World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michiel A. J. Kompier

Michiel A. J. Kompier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1658 1488 97 92 182 20671

Michiel A. J. Kompier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michiel A. J. Kompier between 1990 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michiel A. J. Kompier published across 34 years, from 1990 to 2023, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2004. 2 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2004. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1990 2023

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michiel A. J. Kompier: publications per year, 1990 to 2023
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 5
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 5
2003 8
2004 12
2005 8
2006 11
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 5
2011 7
2012 12
2013 8
2014 8
2015 9
2016 12
2017 6
2018 8
2019 8
2020 8
2021 6
2022 1
2023 1
Total 187
Download as CSV

Michiel A. J. Kompier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel A. J. Kompier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 182
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michiel A. J. Kompier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel A. J. Kompier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michiel A. J. Kompier is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and focuses primarily on research in the fields of psychology and health professions. Their scholarly output spans various subfields including general health professions, applied psychology, cognitive neuroscience, sociology and political science, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics addressed in Michiel Kompier's research encompass behavioral health and interventions, workplace health and well-being, neural and behavioral psychology studies, the impact of technology on adolescents, work-family balance challenges, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, and musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation.

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Michiel Kompier include the following papers:

  • How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews, 2023, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • Reward-driven distraction: A meta-analysis., 2020, Psychological Bulletin
  • Fatigue, boredom and objectively measured smartphone use at work, 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • The effect of opportunity costs on mental fatigue in labor/leisure trade-offs., 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Dim light, sleep tight, and wake up bright - Sleep optimization in athletes by means of light regulation, 2020, European Journal of Sport Science

Michiel Kompier frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Sabine A. E. Geurts
  • Madelon L. M. van Hooff
  • Debby G. J. Beckers
  • Erik Bijleveld
  • Jonas Dora

Their work has been published across multiple academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • Psychological Bulletin
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • European Journal of Sport Science

Best Publications

  • Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease

    Paulien M Bongers;C R de Winter;M A Kompier;Vincent H Hildebrandt

  • The Very Best of the Millennium: Longitudinal Research and the Demand-Control-(Support) Model

    A.H.de Lange;T.W. Taris;M.A.J. Kompier;I.L.D. Houtman

  • Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING

    Sabine A. E. Geurts;Toon W. Taris;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Josje S. E. Dikkers

  • The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study

    Annet H. De Lange;Toon W. Taris;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Irene L. D. Houtman

  • A Critical Examination of the Demand-Control-Support Model from a Work Psychological Perspective

    Jan de Jonge;Michiel A. J. Kompier

  • A multifaceted investigation of the link between mental fatigue and task disengagement

    Jesper F. Hopstaken;Dimitri van der Linden;Arnold B. Bakker;Arnold B. Bakker;Michiel A. J. Kompier

  • Does Work–Home Interference mediate the relationship between workload and well-being?

    Sabine A.E Geurts;Michiel A.J Kompier;Susan Roxburgh;Irene L.D Houtman

  • Do We Recover from Vacation? Meta‐analysis of Vacation Effects on Health and Well‐being

    Jessica de Bloom;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Sabine Geurts;Carolina de Weerth

  • Psychosocial stressors at work and musculoskeletal problems.

    I.L.D. Houtman;P.M. Bongers;P.G.W. Smulders;M.A.J. Kompier

  • Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work–non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes

    Hylco H. Nijp;Debby G. J. Beckers;Sabine A. E. Geurts;Philip Tucker

  • Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach

    Marc van Veldhoven;Jan de Jonge;Sjaak Broersen;Michiel Kompier

  • Challenges in Longitudinal Designs in Occupational Health Psychology

    Toon W Taris;Michiel Kompier

  • Preventing stress, improving productivity: European case studies in the workplace

    Michiel Kompier;Cary L. Cooper

  • Job design and well-being

    Michiel Kompier

  • Cases in stress prevention: the success of a participative and stepwise approach

    Michiel A. J. Kompier;Sabine A. E. Geurts;Robert W. M. Gründemann;Peter Vink

  • Different mechanisms to explain the reversed effects of mental health on work characteristics.

    A.H. de Lange;T.W. Taris;M.A.J. Kompier;I.L.D. Houtman

  • A hard day's night: a longitudinal study on the relationships among job demands and job control, sleep quality and fatigue

    Annet H. De Lange;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Toon W. Taris;Sabine A. E. Geurts

  • The window of my eyes: Task disengagement and mental fatigue covary with pupil dynamics.

    Jesper F. Hopstaken;Dimitri van der Linden;Arnold B. Bakker;Michiel A.J. Kompier

  • Vacation (after-) effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation activities, experiences and sleep

    Jessica de Bloom;Sabine A. E. Geurts;Michiel A. J. Kompier

  • A multiple case study approach to work stress prevention in Europe

    Michiel A. J. Kompier;Cary L. Cooper;Sabine A. E. Geurts

  • Linear and nonlinear relations between psychosocial job characteristics, subjective outcomes, and sickness absence : baseline results from SMASH

    J. de Jonge;M.M.E.N. Reuvers;I.L.D. Houtman;P.M. Bongers

Frequent Co-Authors

Sabine A. E. Geurts
Sabine A. E. Geurts Radboud University
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Dimitri van der Linden
Dimitri van der Linden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Anton M.L. Coenen
Anton M.L. Coenen Radboud University
Jos F. Brosschot
Jos F. Brosschot Leiden University
Annet H. de Lange
Annet H. de Lange Open University in the Netherlands
Sabine Sonnentag
Sabine Sonnentag University of Mannheim
Jessica de Bloom
Jessica de Bloom Tampere University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in psychology opens a wide range of career options, including becoming a substance abuse counselor—an in-demand role across the USA. Many students pursue online degrees in psychology, addiction studies, or counseling to gain flexibility while preparing for certification and licensure requirements in their state.

It's essential to understand that education pathways and requirements can vary depending on location. For example, see the Newark substance abuse counselors education requirements compared to Norfolk substance abuse counselors education requirements. Both require accredited degrees, but state-specific coursework, exams, and supervised experience hours can differ.

Aspiring professionals should also review the North Las Vegas substance abuse counselors education requirements and substance abuse counselor requirements in Oakland. Comparing requirements across regions helps students choose suitable accredited online programs and understand local licensing steps. Researching state-specific requirements ensures the right preparation for a successful career in counseling or related psychology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michiel A. J. Kompier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles